Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #534240 > unrolled thread

‘Based On Nonsense’

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
Last post2015-12-10 19:29 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 119 — 32 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
    Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 11:00 -0800
      Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 17:16 -0800
        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 00:57 -0500
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 22:17 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 01:30 -0500
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:18 -0800
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Alex Sutter" <invalid@troll-lo-lo.com> - 2015-11-22 08:36 -0800
                  Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:48 -0800
                    Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 09:17 -0800
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:31 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:26 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Puppet_Sock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:43 -0800
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:28 -0600
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 15:25 -0800
                  Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 23:49 -0500
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:27 -0600
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 23:11 -0800
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:30 +0100
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 00:41 -0800
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:40 -0500
                  Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 07:45 -0800
                  Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 13:00 -0800
                    Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 07:10 +0100
                    Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:01 -0600
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-11-22 22:32 +0100
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 14:17 -0800
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 21:37 -0800
                  Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-24 22:08 -0800
                    Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 22:20 -0800
                    Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:40 +0100
                      Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 10:24 -0800
                        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 18:32 +0000
                          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 12:01 -0800
                          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 04:48 +0100
                            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-26 14:21 +0000
                              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-27 08:05 +0100
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-23 11:02 -0600
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:38 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 20:44 +0000
            Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:57 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 23:40 -0500
                Re: The great unwashed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-23 21:46 -0800
                  Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-23 22:23 -0800
                    Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-24 08:31 -0500
                  Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "W.T.S. = Golden_Truth_Golden_Light!!!" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-24 06:00 -0600
                    Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-24 06:49 -0600
                      Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-24 08:57 -0500
                    Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-24 10:10 -0800
                      Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 11:14 -0700
                      Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:59 -0500
                        Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 12:07 -0700
                          Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 14:48 -0500
                            Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:03 -0700
                  Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2015-11-24 08:16 -0600
                    Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-11-24 15:54 +0100
                    Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:43 -0500
                      Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 12:07 -0700
                        Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 14:50 -0500
                          Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:02 -0700
                          Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 14:04 -0600
                            Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:08 -0700
                              Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 18:05 -0600
                                Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 17:15 -0700
                      Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 13:56 -0600
                      Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2015-11-24 14:32 -0600
                        Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-24 14:44 -0600
                          Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:55 -0800
                          Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 14:10 -0700
                  Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:22 -0500
                Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 06:08 -0800
                Re: The great unwashed. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:21 -0500
                  Re: The great unwashed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-24 11:35 -0800
                    Re: The great unwashed. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-11-24 19:56 +0000
                    Ben Jacoby should play poker. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-26 06:02 -0800
                      Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 11:42 -0500
                        Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:48 -0500
                          Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:17 -0500
                            Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:41 -0800
                              Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:48 -0500
                                Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:32 -0500
                                Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:52 -0500
                              Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:29 -0500
                            Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:14 -0500
                        Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:39 -0800
                          Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:46 -0500
                            Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:10 -0500
                      Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:36 -0500
                        Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 12:49 -0500
                          Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:43 -0800
                            Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:51 -0500
                              Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:34 -0500
                                Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 20:41 -0500
                                  Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:58 -0500
                                    Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800
                                      Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 23:30 -0500
                                  Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800
                          Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:15 -0500
            Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 19:15 -0800
                Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:43 -0800
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-11-26 08:26 -0500
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-09 10:34 +0000
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 03:18 -0800
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-09 08:31 -0600
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 07:51 -0800
                  Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 16:41 -0500
                  Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-10 16:28 +0000
                    Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 16:01 -0800
                      Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Alfred Summers" <invalid@eyample.com> - 2015-12-10 17:55 -0800
                      Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 03:23 +0000
                        Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 07:23 -0800
                          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 22:33 +0000
                            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 15:41 -0800
                    Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:10 -0800
                      Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-10 23:24 -0800
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →


#535153 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2015-11-24 14:04 -0600
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<48g95blq2g96m1uuef85svj31cc2gvrnqm@4ax.com>
In reply to#535139
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:50:09 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 11/24/2015 02:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 11/24/15, 11:43 AM, in article vd25y.201968$eK.18142@fx11.iad, "benj"
>> <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/24/2015 09:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote in news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{10.12P.Seattle.2015}:
>>>>
>>>>> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'><big><big>Â
>>>>> You (Checkmate) replied (to me):
>>>>>>>     What you want, all you desire,
>>>>>>>     has been programmed into you (by nature).
>>>>>>>     You're a robot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
>>>>>>> fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
>>>>>>> Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most won't "get" this, but I do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Until they need a vaccination or antibiotic.
>>>
>>> So you think you'll be cured by "chance"? That even a bigger stretch
>>> than hoping God does it.
>>
>> That is YOUR stretch... you made it up.
>
>I did no such thing. Do you deny that the theory of evolution is based 
>upon genetic variations determined by chance? Your whole religion is 
>based upon belief in chance.

Get an education and stop being so in-your-face, dishonestly stupid.

Evolution is an observed fact.

The theory is the explanation for the fact, and no matter how many
religiously motivated liars pretend otherwise, evolution is not
"chance".

The random genetic mutations are filtered by survival to pass on
whatever caused their survival.
  
And I'm sure that the  last time you were prescribed antibiotics, your
doctor told you to take the full course for perhaps a month after you
seemed better - to make sure none of the bugs survived to pass on
whatever resistance they had, to subsequent generations.

Or were you just being deliberately and obnoxiously stupid, attacking
atheists by lying about something that is nothing to do with atheism,
that anybody with an IQ more than room temperature, understands?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535154 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-24 13:08 -0700
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<D27A11B4.651E3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#535153
On 11/24/15, 1:04 PM, in article 48g95blq2g96m1uuef85svj31cc2gvrnqm@4ax.com,
"Christopher A. Lee" <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:50:09 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 11/24/2015 02:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 11/24/15, 11:43 AM, in article vd25y.201968$eK.18142@fx11.iad, "benj"
>>> <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 11/24/2015 09:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote in news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{10.12P.Seattle.2015}:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'><big><big>Â
>>>>>> You (Checkmate) replied (to me):
>>>>>>>>     What you want, all you desire,
>>>>>>>>     has been programmed into you (by nature).
>>>>>>>>     You're a robot.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
>>>>>>>> fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
>>>>>>>> Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Most won't "get" this, but I do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>      Until they need a vaccination or antibiotic.
>>>> 
>>>> So you think you'll be cured by "chance"? That even a bigger stretch
>>>> than hoping God does it.
>>> 
>>> That is YOUR stretch... you made it up.
>> 
>> I did no such thing. Do you deny that the theory of evolution is based
>> upon genetic variations determined by chance? Your whole religion is
>> based upon belief in chance.
> 
> Get an education and stop being so in-your-face, dishonestly stupid.
> 
> Evolution is an observed fact.

Correct. It is as well known as anything else we consider to be a fact about
the natural world.

> The theory is the explanation for the fact, and no matter how many
> religiously motivated liars pretend otherwise, evolution is not
> "chance".
> 
> The random genetic mutations are filtered by survival to pass on
> whatever caused their survival.

Right: there is chance involved in the process, but the process is not pure
chance (not even close to it!)
  
> And I'm sure that the  last time you were prescribed antibiotics, your
> doctor told you to take the full course for perhaps a month after you
> seemed better - to make sure none of the bugs survived to pass on
> whatever resistance they had, to subsequent generations.

Usually not a month... but, yes, you have the right idea.

> Or were you just being deliberately and obnoxiously stupid, attacking
> atheists by lying about something that is nothing to do with atheism,
> that anybody with an IQ more than room temperature, understands?

He spoke of my religion, which is weird given how I am an atheist.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535250 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2015-11-24 18:05 -0600
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<jht95bhk2h41fc2ou9vsejfu80ssv65j08@4ax.com>
In reply to#535154
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:08:04 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 11/24/15, 1:04 PM, in article 48g95blq2g96m1uuef85svj31cc2gvrnqm@4ax.com,
>"Christopher A. Lee" <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:50:09 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 11/24/2015 02:07 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 11/24/15, 11:43 AM, in article vd25y.201968$eK.18142@fx11.iad, "benj"
>>>> <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11/24/2015 09:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote in news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{10.12P.Seattle.2015}:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'><big><big>Â
>>>>>>> You (Checkmate) replied (to me):
>>>>>>>>>     What you want, all you desire,
>>>>>>>>>     has been programmed into you (by nature).
>>>>>>>>>     You're a robot.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
>>>>>>>>> fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
>>>>>>>>> Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Most won't "get" this, but I do.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      Until they need a vaccination or antibiotic.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So you think you'll be cured by "chance"? That even a bigger stretch
>>>>> than hoping God does it.
>>>> 
>>>> That is YOUR stretch... you made it up.
>>> 
>>> I did no such thing. Do you deny that the theory of evolution is based
>>> upon genetic variations determined by chance? Your whole religion is
>>> based upon belief in chance.
>> 
>> Get an education and stop being so in-your-face, dishonestly stupid.
>> 
>> Evolution is an observed fact.
>
>Correct. It is as well known as anything else we consider to be a fact about
>the natural world.
>
>> The theory is the explanation for the fact, and no matter how many
>> religiously motivated liars pretend otherwise, evolution is not
>> "chance".
>> 
>> The random genetic mutations are filtered by survival to pass on
>> whatever caused their survival.
>
>Right: there is chance involved in the process, but the process is not pure
>chance (not even close to it!)
>  
>> And I'm sure that the  last time you were prescribed antibiotics, your
>> doctor told you to take the full course for perhaps a month after you
>> seemed better - to make sure none of the bugs survived to pass on
>> whatever resistance they had, to subsequent generations.
>
>Usually not a month... but, yes, you have the right idea.

It was thirty days for me - I had a collapsed lung due to some staph
infection in the blood causing an abscess which burst inside the chest
cavity.

I could hardly breathe, and I almost bled out internally.

So I was on my back for a couple of weeks with a suction tube in my
side, on a saline drip with amoxycllin (sp?) at he same time.

When I was discharged, I was prescribed thirty days worth of tablets
so large a horse would have had difficulty swallowing them - and I got
the lecture from the doctor.

>> Or were you just being deliberately and obnoxiously stupid, attacking
>> atheists by lying about something that is nothing to do with atheism,
>> that anybody with an IQ more than room temperature, understands?
>
>He spoke of my religion, which is weird given how I am an atheist.

The morons have a psychological need for everybody else to have a
religion - so they lie that atheism and evolution are religions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535252 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-24 17:15 -0700
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<D27A4BCE.65226%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#535250
On 11/24/15, 5:05 PM, in article jht95bhk2h41fc2ou9vsejfu80ssv65j08@4ax.com,
"Christopher A. Lee" <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote:

...
>>>>>> So you think you'll be cured by "chance"? That even a bigger stretch than
>>>>>> hoping God does it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> That is YOUR stretch... you made it up.
>>>>> 
>>>> I did no such thing. Do you deny that the theory of evolution is based upon
>>>> genetic variations determined by chance? Your whole religion is based upon
>>>> belief in chance.
>>>> 
>>> Get an education and stop being so in-your-face, dishonestly stupid.
>>> 
>>> Evolution is an observed fact.
>>> 
>> Correct. It is as well known as anything else we consider to be a fact about
>> the natural world.
>> 
>>> The theory is the explanation for the fact, and no matter how many
>>> religiously motivated liars pretend otherwise, evolution is not "chance".
>>> 
>>> The random genetic mutations are filtered by survival to pass on whatever
>>> caused their survival.
>>> 
>> Right: there is chance involved in the process, but the process is not pure
>> chance (not even close to it!)
>> 
>>> And I'm sure that the  last time you were prescribed antibiotics, your
>>> doctor told you to take the full course for perhaps a month after you seemed
>>> better - to make sure none of the bugs survived to pass on whatever
>>> resistance they had, to subsequent generations.
>>> 
>> Usually not a month... but, yes, you have the right idea.
> 
> It was thirty days for me - I had a collapsed lung due to some staph
> infection in the blood causing an abscess which burst inside the chest
> cavity.

Yuck. Sorry to hear.

> I could hardly breathe, and I almost bled out internally.
> 
> So I was on my back for a couple of weeks with a suction tube in my
> side, on a saline drip with amoxycllin (sp?) at he same time.
> 
> When I was discharged, I was prescribed thirty days worth of tablets
> so large a horse would have had difficulty swallowing them - and I got
> the lecture from the doctor.

That is clearly not the norm. Hope you are OK now.

Most antibiotics are for 5 or 10 days, at least from what I have seen. I had
my appendix taken out 2 weeks ago and they did not even send me home with
antibiotics, but did give me some during the operation (was home by that
night). Just came back from having staples removed - healing well.

Certainly nothing as scary as what you went through.
 
>>> Or were you just being deliberately and obnoxiously stupid, attacking
>>> atheists by lying about something that is nothing to do with atheism,
>>> that anybody with an IQ more than room temperature, understands?
>> 
>> He spoke of my religion, which is weird given how I am an atheist.
> 
> The morons have a psychological need for everybody else to have a
> religion - so they lie that atheism and evolution are religions.

Seems that way.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535145 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2015-11-24 13:56 -0600
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<h2g95bttfn5ko5tuopo8ja6nt8btj2agb2@4ax.com>
In reply to#535094
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:43:39 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 11/24/2015 09:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote in news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{10.12P.Seattle.2015}:
>>
>>> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'><big><big>Â
>>> You (Checkmate) replied (to me):
>>>>>    What you want, all you desire,
>>>>>    has been programmed into you (by nature).
>>>>>    You're a robot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
>>>>> fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
>>>>> Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.
>>>>
>>>> Most won't "get" this, but I do.
>>>
>>> Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution:
>>
>>
>>     Until they need a vaccination or antibiotic.
>
>So you think you'll be cured by "chance"? That even a bigger stretch 
>than hoping God does it.

What a fucking moron. A liar who puts words into other people's mouths
that he knows they neither said nor even meant.

You must be a Christian, because that's what those who cross-post to
alt.atheism, do.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535168 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

FromMitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net>
Date2015-11-24 14:32 -0600
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<XnsA55C939D15E03noemailattnet@216.166.97.131>
In reply to#535094
benj <none@gmail.com> wrote in news:vd25y.201968$eK.18142@fx11.iad:

> On 11/24/2015 09:16 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote in
>> news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.23{10.12P.Seattle.2015}: 
>>
>>> <PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'><big><big>Ā
>>> You (Checkmate) replied (to me):
>>>>>    What you want, all you desire,
>>>>>    has been programmed into you (by nature).
>>>>>    You're a robot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
>>>>> fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
>>>>> Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.
>>>>
>>>> Most won't "get" this, but I do.
>>>
>>> Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution:
>>
>>
>>     Until they need a vaccination or antibiotic.
> 
> So you think you'll be cured by "chance"?


  So you think you will be cured by prayer?



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535173 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2015-11-24 14:44 -0600
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<1ri95b1iq609nqu8ukao8jtml2nk7fnivf@4ax.com>
In reply to#535168
Mitchell Holman wrote:

> So you think you will be cured by prayer?

That depends upon his being fortunate-enough to have been born in a
place where the "correct" religion is taught.  Everyone else can just
go to hell.

-- 
"The interesting part of this is that if so many consumers are
profoundly so cheap, then why is it that Linux as an even cheaper
alternative for the desktop hasn't even gained half as much traction
as Apple?"  -  lying asshole "-hh"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535176 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-24 12:55 -0800
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<459d8b3b-cb07-46f3-b36b-bb7bdabdac03@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#535173
Tesla CLAIMED to have a way for us to
get free electricity.
He was shut down by those who would 
rather sell oil.
Whole countries are being bombed to
shit because people want to sell oil.
I'm not saying "go back".
I'm saying take the power away from
those who would prevent us from 
moving forward

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535183 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-11-24 14:10 -0700
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<D27A205D.651F2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#535173
On 11/24/15, 1:44 PM, in article 1ri95b1iq609nqu8ukao8jtml2nk7fnivf@4ax.com,
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> Mitchell Holman wrote:
> 
>> So you think you will be cured by prayer?
> 
> That depends upon his being fortunate-enough to have been born in a
> place where the "correct" religion is taught.  Everyone else can just
> go to hell.

LOL! Gotta love religion.

Well wishes are nice... and someone who knows they are getting them might
benefit. So in that way prayer can help.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535085 — Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-24 13:22 -0500
SubjectRe: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution.
Message-ID<KV15y.172640$qL.115546@fx15.iad>
In reply to#534994
On 11/24/2015 01:12 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
> You (Checkmate) replied (to me):
>> >   What you want, all you desire,
>> >   has been programmed into you (by nature).
>> >   You're a robot.
>> >
>> > Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
>> > fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
>> > Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.
>>
>> Most won't "get" this, but I do.
>
> Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution:
>
>     Jeff-Relf.Me/GodlessEvolution.JPG
>

You mean that only 14% are as ignorant as Rolf?

I don't believe that figure for a second.

A quick trip through the INTERNET proves the number is MUCH higher!

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535036 — Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc.

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-24 06:08 -0800
SubjectRe: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc.
Message-ID<2d1d79d9-1baa-4233-b7d0-7e9339b08490@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#534983
On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 11:40:53 PM UTC-5, benj wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 10:57 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> > On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 7:35:57 PM UTC-5, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>
> >> Most scientists think "Life" requires liquid water.
> >> Ben_Jacoby (benj), on the other hand,
> >> thinks something like "Star Wars" could be true.
> >>
> >> Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
> >> fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
> >>
> >> Truth is:
> >>
> >>    We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc.
> >
> > Speak for yourself you preprogrammed robot Jeff. STFU too.
> >
> >>    Like the sun, stars and everything else...
> >>    we consume "exergy" (energy that can do work);
> >>    i.e. we ratchet entropy.
> >
> > Whatever. I mean "Whatever." Spelling makes it so "exergetic."
> >
> >>    "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more.
> >
> > That you randomly display your "ignorance" "Jeff," brings it "home."
> >
> > -- Mahipal "IPMM... I use quotes Quotes QUOTES, therefore I am."
> 
> Think of this Mypal: Causality is a natural law in the earth. This is 
> well established in science. Therefore Rolf's idea that everything is 
> "already written" as they say, has a certain logic to it.

Ben, as you well know, I love reading your writings! I just do.

Nobody's already written mindset has a validity worth the contemplating.
The future is not preordained, else it wouldn't be worth the having.
Sure we all age, get old, repetitive, tired, and boring. What's new?

> Oddly, religion takes a different view. Take the atheist religion for 
> example. They go with Darwin and thus their "creator" is random chance. 
> But science has said there is no random chance! Causality reigns!

Charles Darwin was a very careful thinker. Evolution is not
predetermined. Evolution is a process, a methodology. Not
fundamentally pre-determinism. My rationale? Simple, if there is their
Creator, One too many, of any colour, why the hell does the human
condition suck so bad?! EOS (== End of Story). Period!
 
> So is Rolf correct then? Puleeeze! You know better than that! Most major 
> religions teach that while causality is a natural law, it can be trumped 
> by "free will". This means that MANKIND is the master of His (includes 
> her) own destiny. IT is the WILL of man that interacts with the 
> luminiferous aether to create all we term reality.

We humans -- individualized or otherise -- do not get to define what
reality actually is. Beg as we might. But I might be blind sighted...

> Oddly if man chooses NOT to exercise his choice which is to say his 
> will, then the future just chugs along EXACTLY as ROLF submits! Scary!

I've already lived through and survived the Scary Geodesic Nightmare.
Everything being preordained, static, 4D static, ... is ...youKnow.

> which is why it is important to constantly be making conscious choices 
> about the things you do! Other wise you end up like ROLF! Nuff said.

Jeff likely has a sociopolitical cause for restating his nonsense.
It's repetitive, useless, and by long gone, boring. Say it again Jeff!
If not Jeff now, someone else would just take his place of nonsense.

> HVAC will think this is "froth" as he calls it. Of course it's only his 
> total ignorance showing. One should NEVER let LIB writers be put in 
> charge of ANYTHING. HVAC is proof positive of that rule.

HVAC never picks on Jeff or Sam Worm Lie. Curious that. Algorithm limits?

Imagine a Usenet where every poster is an AI robototon?! O wait...

The only way for all of us on Usenet, to get rid of HVAC, is we try
never to respond to his daily (HVAC is not SW, imo) barkings. HVAC
just needs to STFU and go swim with his fish. Die HVAC die. Much love.

I'm sorry, but there is some level (HVAC) of Usenet abuse I will never
tolerate. Die HVAC die. No one will miss you, not even robototon Sam
Worm Liar. Sad, so sad for you HVAC (HVAC). Heil HVAC! Die HVAC die. TIA.

Tell me how you defend my Freedom of Speech and all that HVAC?!

O wait HVAC, NFAR... like me on... follow me on... email me at... call
me Me ME! Make ring my iPhone@#. Still, die Heil HVAC die. T I A, and
all that@#. Much love broBitch@# and all that.

> -- 
> 
>        ___           ___           ___            ___
>       /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
>      /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
>     /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
>    /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
>   /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
>   \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
>    \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
>     \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
>      \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
>       ~~            \/__/         \/__/

-- Mahipal "IPMM... Happy Giving Thanks for nothing 0 |0| ||0||..."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535083 — Re: The great unwashed.

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-24 13:21 -0500
SubjectRe: The great unwashed.
Message-ID<pU15y.172639$qL.167646@fx15.iad>
In reply to#534983
On 11/24/2015 12:43 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
> You (Ben_Jacoby) wrote:
>> It's the WILL of man that interacts with the
>> luminiferous aether to create all we term reality.
>
> General Relativity put stop to the "luminiferous aether";
> you don't want to understand that, so you don't.
> You cling to ignorance, the abode of your God.
>
> You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
> you have a 50% of getting it.
> In the end, you say "God Spoke".
>
> Your God is confined to the shaddows;
> banish _ignorance_, and your God is exposed, naked.
>
> Truth is:
>
>    What you want, all you desire,
>    has been programmed into you (by nature).
>    You're a robot.
>
> Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
> fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
> Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.

Oh, look! We have froth! (with due credit to HVAC!)

The ignorance is all yours Rolf. Einstein himself confirmed that the 
existence of aether is BEYOND question. It is only those who worship his 
sphincter like you who have twisted his words into your own atheist 
religious beliefs.

I DO NOT "flip" a quantum mechanical coin hoping for some outcome. It is 
you ignorant savages who think that probability is somehow truth. 
Probability is the science of ignorance! Better than nothing, but hardly 
enlightenment! It suits you perfectly!

Tis, YOU who flip the quantum mechanical coin thinking you know in 
advance the outcome is fixed by causality. But you are ignorant of 
philosophy. When I flip that coin if I choose to ignore it, it can land 
as predetermined by causality. But if I so choose, I can use my mind to 
make it land as I say.

Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535126 — Re: The great unwashed.

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2015-11-24 11:35 -0800
SubjectRe: The great unwashed.
Message-ID<MPG.30be5bd9a080935298b858@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#535083
In article <pU15y.172639$qL.167646@fx15.iad>, none@gmail.com says...


> 
> On 11/24/2015 12:43 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >
> > You (Ben_Jacoby) wrote:
> >> It's the WILL of man that interacts with the
> >> luminiferous aether to create all we term reality.
> >
> > General Relativity put stop to the "luminiferous aether";
> > you don't want to understand that, so you don't.
> > You cling to ignorance, the abode of your God.
> >
> > You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
> > you have a 50% of getting it.
> > In the end, you say "God Spoke".
> >
> > Your God is confined to the shaddows;
> > banish _ignorance_, and your God is exposed, naked.
> >
> > Truth is:
> >
> >    What you want, all you desire,
> >    has been programmed into you (by nature).
> >    You're a robot.
> >
> > Darwin showed how we're related to monkeys;
> > fearing it might justify murder and such, many reject it.
> > Likewise, you (the great unwashed) reject Einstein.
> 
> Oh, look! We have froth! (with due credit to HVAC!)
> 
> The ignorance is all yours Rolf. Einstein himself confirmed that the 
> existence of aether is BEYOND question. It is only those who worship his 
> sphincter like you who have twisted his words into your own atheist 
> religious beliefs.
> 
> I DO NOT "flip" a quantum mechanical coin hoping for some outcome. It is 
> you ignorant savages who think that probability is somehow truth. 
> Probability is the science of ignorance! Better than nothing, but hardly 
> enlightenment! It suits you perfectly!
> 
> Tis, YOU who flip the quantum mechanical coin thinking you know in 
> advance the outcome is fixed by causality. But you are ignorant of 
> philosophy. When I flip that coin if I choose to ignore it, it can land 
> as predetermined by causality. But if I so choose, I can use my mind to 
> make it land as I say.
> 
> Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!

You sound like you have the vapours.

-- 
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2015 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535144 — Re: The great unwashed.

Fromsnipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2)
Date2015-11-24 19:56 +0000
SubjectRe: The great unwashed.
Message-ID<1meeq0g.2x4ffy1pg2tw1N%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>
In reply to#535126
Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

[...]

> > Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
> 
> You sound like you have the vapours.

That's Relf droppings that you can smell.

-- 
^Ï^.        Sn!pe       <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> 

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535592 — Ben Jacoby should play poker.

FromJeff-Relf.Me <@.>
Date2015-11-26 06:02 -0800
SubjectBen Jacoby should play poker.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.26{6.02A.Seattle.2015}>
In reply to#535126
@Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
> > > You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
> > > you have a 50% chance of getting it.
> > > In the end, you say "God Spoke". 
> > 
> > if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
> > Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
> 
> You sound like you have the vapours.

Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
enough to alter a coin flip ?

If true, he should play poker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535628 — Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2015-11-26 11:42 -0500
SubjectRe: Ben Jacoby should play poker.
Message-ID<oide5b5htin81d14e106b9o0a00968ufk1@4ax.com>
In reply to#535592
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

>@Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
>> > > You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
>> > > you have a 50% chance of getting it.
>> > > In the end, you say "God Spoke". 
>> > 
>> > if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
>> > Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
>> 
>> You sound like you have the vapours.
>
>Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
>enough to alter a coin flip ?
>
>If true, he should play poker.

If true he would go get Randi's million dollar
prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in
a scientific surrounding. Many have tried -
ALL have failed.

-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535651 — Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker.

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 12:48 -0500
SubjectRe: Ben Jacoby should play poker.
Message-ID<7CH5y.187366$M%.32694@fx20.iad>
In reply to#535628
On 11/26/2015 11:42 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>
>> @Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
>>>>> You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
>>>>> you have a 50% chance of getting it.
>>>>> In the end, you say "God Spoke".
>>>>
>>>> if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
>>>> Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
>>>
>>> You sound like you have the vapours.
>>
>> Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
>> enough to alter a coin flip ?
>>
>> If true, he should play poker.
>
> If true he would go get Randi's million dollar
> prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in
> a scientific surrounding. Many have tried -
> ALL have failed.

Perhaps you should try for my million dollar prize to prove that all the 
century of experiments even by Nobel Prize winners is all fraud?

And Oh yeah, Like "The Amazing Randi" I'm the one who gets to say if you 
won or not! I don't think you can do anything that will win.


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535665 — Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2015-11-26 13:17 -0500
SubjectRe: Ben Jacoby should play poker.
Message-ID<lsie5b1mb4qnfb4glnk7ag89skq9ibe4kf@4ax.com>
In reply to#535651
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:48:51 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/26/2015 11:42 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>> @Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
>>>>>> You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
>>>>>> you have a 50% chance of getting it.
>>>>>> In the end, you say "God Spoke".
>>>>>
>>>>> if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
>>>>> Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
>>>>
>>>> You sound like you have the vapours.
>>>
>>> Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
>>> enough to alter a coin flip ?
>>>
>>> If true, he should play poker.
>>
>> If true he would go get Randi's million dollar
>> prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in
>> a scientific surrounding. Many have tried -
>> ALL have failed.
>
>Perhaps you should try for my million dollar prize to prove that all the 
>century of experiments even by Nobel Prize winners is all fraud?

One cannot prove scientifically that unsubstantiated claims
are or may be false.

>And Oh yeah, Like "The Amazing Randi" I'm the one who gets to say if you 
>won or not! I don't think you can do anything that will win.

Showing your ignorance again?  Randi's prize is staged in
the presence of scientists and the conditions are strictly
controlled and observed so no hanky-panky goes on. That
is why the prize remains unclaimed - to date there has
been no proof, under scientific observation, that any 
psychokinetics exist.

HTH




-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535674 — Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker.

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2015-11-26 10:41 -0800
SubjectRe: Ben Jacoby should play poker.
Message-ID<MPG.30c0f2433ece4a6d98b8b2@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#535665
In article <lsie5b1mb4qnfb4glnk7ag89skq9ibe4kf@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> 
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:48:51 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 11/26/2015 11:42 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:02:16 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> >>> @Checkmate replied to Ben Jacoby replying to me:
> >>>>>> You flip a coin, hoping for heads, God willing;
> >>>>>> you have a 50% chance of getting it.
> >>>>>> In the end, you say "God Spoke".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if I so choose, I can use my mind to make it land as I say.
> >>>>> Yes, Rolf the laws of the Universe make us all that powerful!
> >>>>
> >>>> You sound like you have the vapours.
> >>>
> >>> Ben Jacoby has psychokinetic powers,
> >>> enough to alter a coin flip ?
> >>>
> >>> If true, he should play poker.
> >>
> >> If true he would go get Randi's million dollar
> >> prize but he'd have to prove his abilities in
> >> a scientific surrounding. Many have tried -
> >> ALL have failed.
> >
> >Perhaps you should try for my million dollar prize to prove that all the 
> >century of experiments even by Nobel Prize winners is all fraud?
> 
> One cannot prove scientifically that unsubstantiated claims
> are or may be false.
> 
> >And Oh yeah, Like "The Amazing Randi" I'm the one who gets to say if you 
> >won or not! I don't think you can do anything that will win.
> 
> Showing your ignorance again?  Randi's prize is staged in
> the presence of scientists and the conditions are strictly
> controlled and observed so no hanky-panky goes on. That
> is why the prize remains unclaimed - to date there has
> been no proof, under scientific observation, that any 
> psychokinetics exist.
> 
> HTH

Oh yeah?  Well I seen that one dude bend spoons with his mind before!

-- 
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2015 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535679 — Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2015-11-26 13:48 -0500
SubjectRe: Ben Jacoby should play poker.
Message-ID<ktke5b1l49i5der29gt4j0crp92r6pqh93@4ax.com>
In reply to#535674
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:41:48 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>
>Oh yeah?  Well I seen that one dude bend spoons with his mind before!

Well, then THAT settles it. Psychokinesis is now a proven fact...

LOL! Actually, it's so funny because that's all the leg these
whackjob paranormal believers have to stand on. 


-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web