Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #534773 > unrolled thread

Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 07:55 -0600
    Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 07:37 -0800
      Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 09:04 -0800
        Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 13:11 -0500
        Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 03:31 -0800
          Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:25 -0500
    Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand  gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:16 -0800
      Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 14:04 -0600
        slow, medium & fast Alfven waves in free space noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 17:43 -0800
        Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand  gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 23:28 -0800
        Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 20:02 +0000
      Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand  gravity "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 03:33 -0800
        Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand  gravity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:26 -0500
    Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 17:33 -0600

#534773 — Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity

Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity
> http://phys.org/news/2015-11-einstein-decades-longer-gravity.html


> To describe curved space-time, Einstein called upon the earlier work
> of Bernhard Riemann, a 19th century mathematician. And with the help
> of his friend Marcel Grossman, also a mathematician, Einstein spent
> several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces,
> or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein
> commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity
> was mere child's play".
>
> Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His
> equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is
> equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he
> believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved
> space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were
> represented by non-Euclidean space.
>

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#534796

So-
We "understand " gravity!!
Who woulda thunk?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534818

So- 
We "understand " gravity!! 
Who woulda thunk
-------------

John it's just your kooky worldview that prevents you from understanding. It's the same with BJ and most other kooks. You have allowed your insane beliefs to cloud and obfuscate reality from you.

Rant over. Now you can go back to your child molestation

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534842

On 11/23/2015 12:04 PM, HVAC wrote:
> So-
> We "understand " gravity!!
> Who woulda thunk
> -------------
>
> John it's just your kooky worldview that prevents you from understanding. It's the same with BJ and most other kooks. You have allowed your insane beliefs to cloud and obfuscate reality from you.
>
> Rant over. Now you can go back to your child molestation

Tell us again, HVAC how "warps" in space-time "explain" gravity?

You need to take your meds again.



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535007

On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 7:04:20 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote:
> So- 
> We "understand " gravity!! 
> Who woulda thunk
> -------------
> 
> John it's just your kooky worldview that prevents you from understanding. It's the same with BJ and most other kooks. You have allowed your insane beliefs to cloud and obfuscate reality from you.
> 
> Rant over. Now you can go back to your child molestation

========================a
****anonymous****** dreck 'havac
is a hired shameless  pig gangster 

go   f your mother pig 

Y.Porat
=======================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535087

On 11/24/2015 06:31 AM, Y.Porat wrote:
> On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 7:04:20 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote:
>> So-
>> We "understand " gravity!!
>> Who woulda thunk
>> -------------
>>
>> John it's just your kooky worldview that prevents you from understanding. It's the same with BJ and most other kooks. You have allowed your insane beliefs to cloud and obfuscate reality from you.
>>
>> Rant over. Now you can go back to your child molestation
>
> ========================a
> ****anonymous****** dreck 'havac
> is a hired shameless  pig gangster
>
> go   f your mother pig
>
> Y.Porat
> =======================

Hey! We have froth! Nice froth properly directed too!

Good rant pooter!



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534872 — Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity
> > http://phys.org/news/2015-11-einstein-decades-longer-gravity.html
> 
> > To describe curved space-time, Einstein called upon the earlier work
> > of Bernhard Riemann, a 19th century mathematician. And with the help
> > of his friend Marcel Grossman, also a mathematician, Einstein spent
> > several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces,
> > or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein
> > commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity
> > was mere child's play".
> >
> > Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His
> > equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is
> > equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he
> > believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved
> > space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were
> > represented by non-Euclidean space.
> >
> 
> --
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.


Gravity is 'just a theory'....there is no proof or fact that there such
a thing as ...Gravity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534882

On 11/23/15 1:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Gravity is 'just a theory'....there is no proof or fact that there such
> a thing as ...Gravity.

   Is there some reason you can float without touching the ground?


   Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand
   gravity
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-11-einstein-decades-longer-gravity.html

 > To describe curved space-time, Einstein called upon the earlier work
 > of Bernhard Riemann, a 19th century mathematician. And with the help
 > of his friend Marcel Grossman, also a mathematician, Einstein spent
 > several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces,
 > or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein
 > commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity
 > was mere child's play".
 >
 > Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His
 > equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is
 > equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he
 > believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved
 > space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were
 > represented by non-Euclidean space.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534954 — slow, medium & fast Alfven waves in free space

the curvature of space cannot only be denoted
by the density of the atoms of free space;
see Alfven's plasma physics (school

>    Is there some reason you can float without touching the ground?

>  > several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces,
>  > or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein
>  > commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity
>  > was mere child's play".
>  >
>  > Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His
>  > equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is
>  > equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he
>  > believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved
>  > space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were
>  > represented by non-Euclidean space.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534999 — Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 11/23/15 1:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Gravity is 'just a theory'....there is no proof or fact that there such
> > a thing as ...Gravity.
> 
>    Is there some reason you can float without touching the ground?


The ice is slippery.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535159

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/23/15 1:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Gravity is 'just a theory'....there is no proof or fact that there such
>> a thing as ...Gravity.
> 
>   Is there some reason you can float without touching the ground?

Is there some reason you keep posting this over and over again,
ass hole?


> 
>   Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand
>   gravity
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-11-einstein-decades-longer-gravity.html
> 
>> To describe curved space-time, Einstein called upon the earlier work
>> of Bernhard Riemann, a 19th century mathematician. And with the help
>> of his friend Marcel Grossman, also a mathematician, Einstein spent
>> several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces,
>> or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein
>> commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity
>> was mere child's play".
>>
>> Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His
>> equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is
>> equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he
>> believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved
>> space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were
>> represented by non-Euclidean space.
> 
> 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535008 — Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity

On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 9:16:36 PM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> > 
> > Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity
> > > http://phys.org/news/2015-11-einstein-decades-longer-gravity.html
> > 
> > > To describe curved space-time, Einstein called upon the earlier work
> > > of Bernhard Riemann, a 19th century mathematician. And with the help
> > > of his friend Marcel Grossman, also a mathematician, Einstein spent
> > > several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces,
> > > or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein
> > > commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity
> > > was mere child's play".
> > >
> > > Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His
> > > equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is
> > > equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he
> > > believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved
> > > space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were
> > > represented by non-Euclidean space.
> > >
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> 
> Gravity is 'just a theory'....there is no proof or fact that there such
> a thing as ...Gravity.

========================
another idiot parrot around the table !!

-----------------------------
Y.P
=====================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535088 — Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity

On 11/24/2015 06:33 AM, Y.Porat wrote:
> On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 9:16:36 PM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>
>>> Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity
>>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-11-einstein-decades-longer-gravity.html
>>>
>>>> To describe curved space-time, Einstein called upon the earlier work
>>>> of Bernhard Riemann, a 19th century mathematician. And with the help
>>>> of his friend Marcel Grossman, also a mathematician, Einstein spent
>>>> several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces,
>>>> or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein
>>>> commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity
>>>> was mere child's play".
>>>>
>>>> Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His
>>>> equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is
>>>> equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he
>>>> believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved
>>>> space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were
>>>> represented by non-Euclidean space.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>>> community, and physics-related social issues.
>>
>>
>> Gravity is 'just a theory'....there is no proof or fact that there such
>> a thing as ...Gravity.
>
> ========================
> another idiot parrot around the table !!
>
> -----------------------------
> Y.P
> =====================================

Starfaker is a media Lib, Pooter. "Idiot parrot" hardly comes up to the 
level needed for his description.



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535243

On 11/23/2015 7:55 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity


wrong.  Assumes facts not in evidence or on earth.


        (=> Fat man in a cube stuff.)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web