Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #535159
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity |
| Date | 2015-11-24 20:02 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <3cseic-d0e.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <T8WdnRS51LArh87LnZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56536610.51BD@ix.netcom.com> <0JKdndH97MvT7M7LnZ2dnUU7-Q2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/23/15 1:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Gravity is 'just a theory'....there is no proof or fact that there such >> a thing as ...Gravity. > > Is there some reason you can float without touching the ground? Is there some reason you keep posting this over and over again, ass hole? > > Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand > gravity >> http://phys.org/news/2015-11-einstein-decades-longer-gravity.html > >> To describe curved space-time, Einstein called upon the earlier work >> of Bernhard Riemann, a 19th century mathematician. And with the help >> of his friend Marcel Grossman, also a mathematician, Einstein spent >> several exhausting years learning the mathematics of curved spaces, >> or what mathematicians call "differential geometry". As Einstein >> commented, "compared with understanding gravity, special relativity >> was mere child's play". >> >> Now Einstein had the mathematical tools to finalise his theory. His >> equivalence principle stated that an accelerating reference frame is >> equivalent to a gravitational field. From his geometrical studies, he >> believed the gravitational field was simply a manifestation of curved >> space-time. Hence, Einstein could show that accelerating frames were >> represented by non-Euclidean space. > > -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 07:55 -0600
Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 07:37 -0800
Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 09:04 -0800
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 13:11 -0500
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 03:31 -0800
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:25 -0500
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:16 -0800
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 14:04 -0600
slow, medium & fast Alfven waves in free space noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 17:43 -0800
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 23:28 -0800
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 20:02 +0000
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 03:33 -0800
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:26 -0500
Re: Without Einstein it would have taken decades longer to understand gravity gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 17:33 -0600
csiph-web