Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #534240 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 119 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 11:00 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 00:57 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 22:17 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 01:30 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:18 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Alex Sutter" <invalid@troll-lo-lo.com> - 2015-11-22 08:36 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:48 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 09:17 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:31 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:26 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Puppet_Sock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:43 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:28 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 15:25 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 23:49 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:27 -0600
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 23:11 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:30 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 00:41 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:40 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 07:45 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 13:00 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 07:10 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:01 -0600
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-11-22 22:32 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 14:17 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 21:37 -0800
Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-24 22:08 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 22:20 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:40 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 10:24 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 18:32 +0000
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 12:01 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 04:48 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-26 14:21 +0000
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-27 08:05 +0100
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-23 11:02 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:38 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 20:44 +0000
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:57 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 23:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-23 21:46 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-23 22:23 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-24 08:31 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "W.T.S. = Golden_Truth_Golden_Light!!!" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-11-24 06:00 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-24 06:49 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-24 08:57 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-24 10:10 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 11:14 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:59 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 12:07 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 14:48 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:03 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2015-11-24 08:16 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-11-24 15:54 +0100
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 12:07 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 14:50 -0500
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:02 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 14:04 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 18:05 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-11-24 13:56 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2015-11-24 14:32 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-24 14:44 -0600
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:55 -0800
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-24 14:10 -0700
Re: Only 14% of Americans believe in GodlessEvolution. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:22 -0500
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 06:08 -0800
Re: The great unwashed. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-24 11:35 -0800
Re: The great unwashed. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-11-24 19:56 +0000
Ben Jacoby should play poker. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-26 06:02 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 11:42 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:48 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:17 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:41 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:48 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:32 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:52 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:29 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:14 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:39 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:46 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:10 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:36 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 12:49 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 10:43 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:34 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-11-26 20:41 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 20:58 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-11-26 20:23 -0800
Re: Ben Jacoby should play poker. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:15 -0500
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 19:15 -0800
Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:43 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-11-26 08:26 -0500
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-09 10:34 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 03:18 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-09 08:31 -0600
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 07:51 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 16:41 -0500
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-10 16:28 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 16:01 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Alfred Summers" <invalid@eyample.com> - 2015-12-10 17:55 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 03:23 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 07:23 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 22:33 +0000
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 15:41 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:10 -0800
Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-10 23:24 -0800
Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Based On Nonsense |
| Message-ID | <564F6B1C.6890@ix.netcom.com> |
http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 11:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <564F6DC6.127E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #534240 |
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
non·sense
'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
noun
noun: nonsense
1.
spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
1) Earth-size planet
So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 17:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56511756.777C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #534242 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/ > > non·sense > 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/ > noun > noun: nonsense > > 1. > spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense. > > How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'... > > 1) Earth-size planet > > So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 00:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <XOc4y.155775$sK.94170@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #534475 |
On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
>>
>> non·sense
>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
>> noun
>> noun: nonsense
>>
>> 1.
>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
>>
>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
>>
>> 1) Earth-size planet
>>
>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
>
>
> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
>
>
> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
"kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
ignorant?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 22:17 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <9702e723-e304-4bdd-81bd-4ec6185601fe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534504 |
The powers that be Big Pharma Big Oil The Cattle Insustry The Medical Industry (subset of Big Pharma) The Arms Industry DON'T WANT THE TRUTH. We can live and be healthy WITHOUT OIL WITHOUT SUBJUGATING AND EATING SENTIENT BEINGS WITHOUT KILLING OTHER PEOPLE
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 01:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <gid4y.82528$WF.32162@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #534510 |
On 11/22/2015 01:17 AM, john wrote:
> The powers that be
> Big Pharma
> Big Oil
> The Cattle Insustry
> The Medical Industry (subset of Big Pharma)
> The Arms Industry
> DON'T WANT THE TRUTH.
>
> We can live and be healthy
> WITHOUT OIL
> WITHOUT SUBJUGATING AND EATING SENTIENT BEINGS
> WITHOUT KILLING OTHER PEOPLE
Well certainly without oil. People lived for many years with no
knowledge of it or what it could do. Life was a lot harder then though.
And the human digestion can get along quite fine without killing and
eating animals. Vegetarians have proved that beyond any doubt (except to
HVAC, natch, who makes fun of anyone "believing" that vegetarianism
exists). However, the problem is your term "sentient beings". Carrots
might feel themselves to be sentient beings! I know that Clyde and Phil
(my two philodendron plants used for ESP experiments (paying attention
HVAC?)) certain consider themselves sentient beings by any such definition.
As for not killing other people, clearly that is going too far. Some
people just NEED killing. Ask HVAC about those he's killed and now sees
their ghosts every night. Right now he's big on killing all Muslims. I
don't agree that they all need killing. However, some do.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 08:18 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <964fdbb9-2c65-4613-9157-57016cb4d963@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534513 |
On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 1:30:40 AM UTC-5, benj wrote: > On 11/22/2015 01:17 AM, john wrote: > > The powers that be > > Big Pharma > > Big Oil > > The Cattle Insustry > > The Medical Industry (subset of Big Pharma) > > The Arms Industry > > DON'T WANT THE TRUTH. > > > > We can live and be healthy > > WITHOUT OIL > > WITHOUT SUBJUGATING AND EATING SENTIENT BEINGS > > WITHOUT KILLING OTHER PEOPLE > > Well certainly without oil. People lived for many years with no > knowledge of it or what it could do. Life was a lot harder then though. It wasn't so bad. A lot of USA type of Americans, even today, live without homes, cars, and food. So, life's worse now. > And the human digestion can get along quite fine without killing and > eating animals. Vegetarians have proved that beyond any doubt (except to > HVAC, natch, who makes fun of anyone "believing" that vegetarianism > exists). However, the problem is your term "sentient beings". Carrots > might feel themselves to be sentient beings! I know that Clyde and Phil > (my two philodendron plants used for ESP experiments (paying attention > HVAC?)) certain consider themselves sentient beings by any such definition. Heil HVAC eats shit Shit SHIT! Anywho... Sentient beings argument fails on many levels. One is this, what do fish eat? What to lions, tigers, and bears eat? So humans eatings humans is still not a good idea. In my humble opinion and all that. > As for not killing other people, clearly that is going too far. Some > people just NEED killing. Ask HVAC about those he's killed and now sees > their ghosts every night. Right now he's big on killing all Muslims. I > don't agree that they all need killing. However, some do. It would cost tons of less money to merely house the humans -- refugee Syrians or otherwise -- locally than it does to perpetually fund the cruel Cruel CRUEL MIC. Obviously the money exists, and is available, why else does the MIC hijack so much of it? RIP JFK. Never fear... The only people on the BIGDATA USVISIT WATCHLIST feeding the MIC countries, I mean companies, databases are... youKnow. The real money problem is everyone wants to be richer than one infamous Bill$ Gate$. Realistically, the money available from Yesterday, Today, through Tomorrow is actually finite. Money buys Sex. Money is not Time. But "IPMM" has to have it all ...S(y)ndrome. > -- > > ___ ___ ___ ___ > /\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \ > /::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \ > /:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\ > /::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/ > /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ / > \:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ / > \:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/ > \:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ / > \::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ / > ~~ \/__/ \/__/ -- Mahipal "IPMM..."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex Sutter" <invalid@troll-lo-lo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 08:36 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <n2squp$ilp$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #534565 |
Mahipal, 14 August 2015: > A lot of posters do not like me. Apparently. By a > lot, I mean a lot Lot LOT of people. I hurt their > sensibilities. It's like I was once married to them > all. Regardless... I am leaving Usenet now and > forever. It's their playground and I obviously > am not welcome. > I also enjoy being anally violated by Nicolas Cage >while listening to Nickleback a lot. A LOT. >So goodbye Goodbye GOODBYE. Mahipal's tearful farwarell message: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/sci.physics/UIfOYtrXEMc/DCrgBtWzmxUJ Adios, you boring troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 08:48 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <a8418799-406a-4552-b01d-c3fdab1b8cab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534570 |
Mapleloops, much like John and BJ, is a crybaby. They live in a pc world where everyone is a winner. This makes them soft with no backbone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 09:17 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <75d0ba9c-3d09-4493-a554-aa01d8077053@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534571 |
On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 11:48:40 AM UTC-5, HVAC wrote: > Mapleloops, much like John and BJ, is a crybaby. They live in a pc world where everyone is a winner. > > This makes them soft with no backbone. Heil HVAC! Bring it Bitch! -- Mahipal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 08:31 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <b3a4f1ed-cc81-4f8b-b48d-428d22b245e6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534513 |
And the human digestion can get along quite fine without killing and eating animals. Vegetarians have proved that beyond any doubt (except to HVAC, natch, who makes fun of anyone "believing" that vegetarianism exists). However, the problem is your term "sentient beings". Carrots might feel themselves to be sentient beings! I know that Clyde and Phil (my two philodendron plants used for ESP experiments (paying attention HVAC?)) certain consider themselves sentient beings by any such definition. As for not killing other people, clearly that is going too far. Some people just NEED killing. Ask HVAC about those he's killed and now sees their ghosts every night. Right now he's big on killing all Muslims. I don't agree that they all need killing. However, some do. --------- Your obsession with me is noted. I find it amusing. But if you ever come near my family I will smile/kill you. Have a nice day!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 08:26 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <a28867c8-82f8-4b5b-a036-99e7787436f4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534510 |
The powers that be Big Pharma Big Oil The Cattle Insustry The Medical Industry (subset of Big Pharma) The Arms Industry DON'T WANT THE TRUTH. We can live and be healthy WITHOUT OIL WITHOUT SUBJUGATING AND EATING SENTIENT BEINGS WITHOUT KILLING OTHER PEOPLE ---------- Stfu hippy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Puppet_Sock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 12:43 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <4a080358-e829-414a-a030-ae561b0868df@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534510 |
On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 1:17:44 AM UTC-5, john wrote: [snip] > We can live and be healthy > WITHOUT OIL > WITHOUT SUBJUGATING AND EATING SENTIENT BEINGS > WITHOUT KILLING OTHER PEOPLE We CAN live without these things. Some of us. For a while. Life expectancies before the use of oil were typically 40 years or less. Infant mortality was typicaly as high as 50 percent. The land required to grow enough food to feed one person was typically 6 times as much as now, and in some places much higher. Transportation of food such as fresh fruit would be impossible, so you would wind up with a variety of malnutrition illnesses. Asking humanity to go back to conditions before fossil fuel is in effect condeming us to a population less than one fourth what it is now. Three quarters of the population of the planet would die, usually violently or horribly, such as from starvation, or some now treatable or preventable illness. As well, there is really no possibility of retaining anything like wilderness. When people are starving they will go into the woods and eat anything edible. Anything not edible will be killed to make way for something edible. There would long since have been not one single speck of wilderness left if it were not for modern use of fossil fuels. Just one example, modern farming means we can grow enough to feed 6 billion now on less land than it took to feed 1 billion of us when there were only 1 billion of us. So, for example, the development of fossil fuels is the only reason there are any whales left in the world. Otherwise they would have long since have been harvested for whale oil for lamps. Anybody who seriously tries to get you to give up fossil fuel should be smacked until he stops it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 16:28 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <n32ob4$iuc$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #535172 |
On 11/24/2015 2:43 PM, Puppet_Sock wrote: > On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 1:17:44 AM UTC-5, john wrote: > [snip] >> We can live and be healthy >> WITHOUT OIL >> WITHOUT SUBJUGATING AND EATING SENTIENT BEINGS >> WITHOUT KILLING OTHER PEOPLE > We CAN live without these things. Some of us. For a while. > > Life expectancies before the use of oil were typically > 40 years or less. Infant mortality was typicaly as high > as 50 percent. The land required to grow enough food to > feed one person was typically 6 times as much as now, > and in some places much higher. Transportation of food > such as fresh fruit would be impossible, so you would > wind up with a variety of malnutrition illnesses. > Asking humanity to go back to conditions before fossil > fuel is in effect condeming us to a population less than > one fourth what it is now. Three quarters of the > population of the planet would die, usually violently > or horribly, such as from starvation, or some now > treatable or preventable illness. > As well, there is really no possibility of retaining > anything like wilderness. When people are starving > they will go into the woods and eat anything edible. > Anything not edible will be killed to make way for > something edible. There would long since have been > not one single speck of wilderness left if it were > not for modern use of fossil fuels. Just one example, > modern farming means we can grow enough to feed > 6 billion now on less land than it took to feed > 1 billion of us when there were only 1 billion of us. > So, for example, the development of fossil fuels is > the only reason there are any whales left in the > world. Otherwise they would have long since have > been harvested for whale oil for lamps. > > Anybody who seriously tries to get you to give up > fossil fuel should be smacked until he stops it. > it's hippy smack! smacking time!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 15:25 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <57231069-aa8a-4182-a1f6-10a0383c04de@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #535215 |
Whatever. I was curling over like all the other old people. Now I'm not, and I can play frisbee again, and my lower back is strong and flexible. My good. I'm not invested in any one else doing the same- eat what you want
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 23:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <n5b5y.200318$nL.185030@fx25.iad> |
| In reply to | #535239 |
On 11/24/2015 06:25 PM, john wrote:
> Whatever.
> I was curling over like all the other
> old people. Now I'm not, and I can
> play frisbee again, and my lower back
> is strong and flexible.
> My good.
> I'm not invested in any one else doing
> the same- eat what you want
>
John! Have you been subjugating and eating sentient beings again?
Shame on you!
Eat some Twinkies to get that curl started again! Twinkies are all made
from fossil fuels and produce plenty of serious greenhouse gases as well!
PS. Email me at my SPAM filter: SPAM<at>mrk-inc.com
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 16:27 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: 'Based On Nonsense' |
| Message-ID | <n32o8d$iuc$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #534510 |
On 11/22/2015 12:17 AM, john wrote: > The powers that be > Big Pharma > Big Oil > The Cattle Insustry > The Medical Industry (subset of Big Pharma) > The Arms Industry > DON'T WANT THE TRUTH. > > We can live and be healthy > WITHOUT OIL > WITHOUT SUBJUGATING AND EATING SENTIENT BEINGS > WITHOUT KILLING OTHER PEOPLE > like wander in the fields, + eating shrooms, naked ? you want people to eat plants ! that is PLANT ABUSE ! that plant was somebodys mother. just because it has no eyes or face, dosn't mean you can EAT IT !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 23:11 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <56516A8D.4546@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #534504 |
benj wrote: > > On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/ > >> > >> non·sense > >> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/ > >> noun > >> noun: nonsense > >> > >> 1. > >> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense. > >> > >> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'... > >> > >> 1) Earth-size planet > >> > >> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? > > > > > > Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, > > > > > > How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system? > > How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we > see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM > truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life > forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea > "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and > ignorant? Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar system are Earth-size planets?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 09:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <dbdcp8Fal94U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #534516 |
Am 22.11.2015 08:11, schrieb The Starmaker: >>>> 1. >>>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense. >>>> >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'... >>>> >>>> 1) Earth-size planet >>>> >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? >>> >>> >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, >>> >>> >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system? >> >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we >> see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and >> ignorant? > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar > system are Earth-size planets? Depends on what you regard as 'Earth-size'. At least the Earth has this size. But roughly Mars and Venus are 'Earth-sized'. But - in a way - all the 'stony' planets are similar in size, while gas-planets are much larger. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 00:41 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ |
| Message-ID | <56517FCD.2E34@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #534520 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 22.11.2015 08:11, schrieb The Starmaker: > > >>>> 1. > >>>> spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense. > >>>> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'... > >>>> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet > >>>> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense? > >>> > >>> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it, > >>> > >>> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system? > >> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we > >> see)? People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and > >> ignorant? > > > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar > > system are Earth-size planets? > > Depends on what you regard as 'Earth-size'. > > At least the Earth has this size. > > But roughly Mars and Venus are 'Earth-sized'. > > But - in a way - all the 'stony' planets are similar in size, while > gas-planets are much larger. > > TH How about Pluto?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web