Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #506321 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-11 11:02 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-07-28 17:27 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 644 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 11:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-12 09:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-13 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 07:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 09:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-15 12:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 14:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-16 13:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-17 05:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 10:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 14:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 22:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-17 22:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Rockinghorse Winner <rhorse@sonic.net> - 2015-07-18 16:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-18 18:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 07:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 14:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 22:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-17 19:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-18 20:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 07:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-19 21:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 19:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-20 17:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-19 21:07 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-20 19:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-21 22:39 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-21 17:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 21:12 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-23 22:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-22 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-22 17:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-22 16:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 17:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 23:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 18:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 12:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 19:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-20 17:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-23 16:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 06:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-21 10:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 11:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-21 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 17:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 03:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 07:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 05:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-23 05:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 07:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 11:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 11:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-22 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-23 11:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 13:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 11:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 12:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 13:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 13:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 23:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 12:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 01:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-08-01 18:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. (BS) tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-07-28 13:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 05:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 08:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 08:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 12:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 07:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 14:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 12:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 07:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 07:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 03:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 04:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 04:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 03:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 03:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 03:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 14:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 07:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 07:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 07:33 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 18:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:53 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:52 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 04:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 18:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 04:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 16:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 00:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 03:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 10:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 00:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 14:08 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 00:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 14:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 01:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 06:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-30 09:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 03:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:39 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:41 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 19:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 06:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 07:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 07:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-18 07:19 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-18 10:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 12:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-18 18:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 07:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 14:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 07:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 14:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-20 19:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-20 17:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-21 12:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-22 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-20 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-21 05:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 06:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-21 22:24 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-21 17:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-21 20:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 20:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-23 22:01 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-26 18:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-21 18:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 09:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-25 06:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 12:47 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 07:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 19:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-19 07:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 14:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 07:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-20 17:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-21 18:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 09:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-22 11:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 12:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 21:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 17:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 17:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 07:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 12:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 06:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 07:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 10:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 18:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 05:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 18:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 19:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:39 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Amanda Bush <jacke@nobody.com> - 2015-07-24 15:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 12:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 00:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 22:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 02:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 09:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 21:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-26 06:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-26 17:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 16:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 23:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 02:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 09:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 19:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 23:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-19 21:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-20 19:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-21 22:34 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-21 18:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 21:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:27 -0500
Page 23 of 33 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 … 33 Next page →
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 14:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <46kksapqbahbtodf0vnqbirk4a04m8v0cv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512746 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:48:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:43:44 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:17 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be
>>>>>>>>unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist,
>>>>>>>>narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Oh, you won't be in his presence.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will
>>>>>>be in his presence during the judgment.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment.
>>>>>I don't know. No man does.
>>>
>>>> But you claim he will and will not stand before God in judgment.
>>>
>>>Intelligent people are able to parse the difference.
>>
>> Perhaps I'm not as intelligent as the world would have me
>>believe. You'll need to explain to me how #2 will AND will not stand
>>before God, at the same time.
>
>You're trying to split hairs.
>
You made both claims. Which one will you admit to being the lie?
>>>>>> In fact, you claim above, "...you will stand before God in
>>>>>>judgment." which is consistent with the claims of the Bible. But now
>>>>>>you are taking the position that he won't.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>You'll get the memo regarding our demise.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm going to presume you meant your demise.
>>>>>> Bar the Bible having lied, he wouldn't get a memo. It claims God
>>>>>>will tell people direct and in person.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, he will.
>>>>
>>>> So you lied about the memo.
>>>> Got it.
>>>>
>>>>>That's the least of your problems regarding what God's courtroom
>>>>>looks like.
>>>>
>>>> We're not discussing the physical appearance. We're currently
>>>>discussing your claim that #2 will, and will not, stand before God. At
>>>>the same time.
>>>Actually, we are.
>> No, we're not.
>
>I rest my case.
>
You mean you lost.
>>>I have no idea if God is in front of you at judgment or
>>>behind you. But he is still the judge.
>
>> Except that, according to you, #2 will be exempt from seeing him
>>(stand before) while being required to see him at the same time.
>> Your position does not make any sense.
>
>Nor do I have any authority to answer.
You have the authority to state which of the two is the lie,
since you stated both will happen.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 11:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l4rusa1hs6oo9mqd71orq4tlrd4u2n5bfe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512806 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:45:51 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:48:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:43:44 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:17 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be >>>>>>>>>unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist, >>>>>>>>>narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Oh, you won't be in his presence. >>>>>> >>>>>>> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will >>>>>>>be in his presence during the judgment. >>>>>> >>>>>>Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment. >>>>>>I don't know. No man does. >>>> >>>>> But you claim he will and will not stand before God in judgment. >>>> >>>>Intelligent people are able to parse the difference. >>> >>> Perhaps I'm not as intelligent as the world would have me >>>believe. You'll need to explain to me how #2 will AND will not stand >>>before God, at the same time. >> >>You're trying to split hairs. > You made both claims. Which one will you admit to being the lie? Neither. Those dying in mortal sin go immediately to the fires. >>>>>>> In fact, you claim above, "...you will stand before God in >>>>>>>judgment." which is consistent with the claims of the Bible. But now >>>>>>>you are taking the position that he won't. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>You'll get the memo regarding our demise. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm going to presume you meant your demise. >>>>>>> Bar the Bible having lied, he wouldn't get a memo. It claims God >>>>>>>will tell people direct and in person. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes, he will. >>>>> >>>>> So you lied about the memo. >>>>> Got it. >>>>> >>>>>>That's the least of your problems regarding what God's courtroom >>>>>>looks like. >>>>> >>>>> We're not discussing the physical appearance. We're currently >>>>>discussing your claim that #2 will, and will not, stand before God. At >>>>>the same time. >>>>Actually, we are. >>> No, we're not. >> >>I rest my case. > You mean you lost. Only the saved. >>>>I have no idea if God is in front of you at judgment or >>>>behind you. But he is still the judge. >> >>> Except that, according to you, #2 will be exempt from seeing him >>>(stand before) while being required to see him at the same time. >>> Your position does not make any sense. >> >>Nor do I have any authority to answer. > You have the authority to state which of the two is the lie, >since you stated both will happen. Neither. But you're not bright enough to understand. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 15:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ob8vsati19nfrgcs7kab2mc8bg8j4meoa7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #513908 |
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:46:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:45:51 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:48:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:43:44 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:17 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>>>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be
>>>>>>>>>>unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist,
>>>>>>>>>>narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Oh, you won't be in his presence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will
>>>>>>>>be in his presence during the judgment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment.
>>>>>>>I don't know. No man does.
>>>>>
>>>>>> But you claim he will and will not stand before God in judgment.
>>>>>
>>>>>Intelligent people are able to parse the difference.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps I'm not as intelligent as the world would have me
>>>>believe. You'll need to explain to me how #2 will AND will not stand
>>>>before God, at the same time.
>>>
>>>You're trying to split hairs.
>
>> You made both claims. Which one will you admit to being the lie?
>
>Neither. Those dying in mortal sin go immediately to the fires.
>
So you lied twice? Doesn't the Bible make reference to lying be a
bad thing?
>>>>>>>> In fact, you claim above, "...you will stand before God in
>>>>>>>>judgment." which is consistent with the claims of the Bible. But now
>>>>>>>>you are taking the position that he won't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You'll get the memo regarding our demise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm going to presume you meant your demise.
>>>>>>>> Bar the Bible having lied, he wouldn't get a memo. It claims God
>>>>>>>>will tell people direct and in person.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes, he will.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you lied about the memo.
>>>>>> Got it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's the least of your problems regarding what God's courtroom
>>>>>>>looks like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We're not discussing the physical appearance. We're currently
>>>>>>discussing your claim that #2 will, and will not, stand before God. At
>>>>>>the same time.
>>>>>Actually, we are.
>>>> No, we're not.
>>>
>>>I rest my case.
>
>> You mean you lost.
>
>Only the saved.
>
You lost the saved? That makes no sense.
>>>>>I have no idea if God is in front of you at judgment or
>>>>>behind you. But he is still the judge.
>>>
>>>> Except that, according to you, #2 will be exempt from seeing him
>>>>(stand before) while being required to see him at the same time.
>>>> Your position does not make any sense.
>>>
>>>Nor do I have any authority to answer.
>
>> You have the authority to state which of the two is the lie,
>>since you stated both will happen.
>
>Neither. But you're not bright enough to understand.
>
Above you claim both are lies.
Pick a lane.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 14:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0lo1ta13g1qb3tm37aijf5gh7oec05sk2l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #513973 |
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:30:57 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:46:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:45:51 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:48:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:43:44 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:17 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be >>>>>>>>>>>unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist, >>>>>>>>>>>narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Oh, you won't be in his presence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will >>>>>>>>>be in his presence during the judgment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment. >>>>>>>>I don't know. No man does. >>>>>> >>>>>>> But you claim he will and will not stand before God in judgment. >>>>>> >>>>>>Intelligent people are able to parse the difference. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps I'm not as intelligent as the world would have me >>>>>believe. You'll need to explain to me how #2 will AND will not stand >>>>>before God, at the same time. >>>> >>>>You're trying to split hairs. >> >>> You made both claims. Which one will you admit to being the lie? >> >>Neither. Those dying in mortal sin go immediately to the fires. >> > > So you lied twice? Doesn't the Bible make reference to lying be a >bad thing? No lying. >>>>>>I have no idea if God is in front of you at judgment or >>>>>>behind you. But he is still the judge. >>>> >>>>> Except that, according to you, #2 will be exempt from seeing him >>>>>(stand before) while being required to see him at the same time. >>>>> Your position does not make any sense. >>>> >>>>Nor do I have any authority to answer. >> >>> You have the authority to state which of the two is the lie, >>>since you stated both will happen. >>Neither. But you're not bright enough to understand. > Above you claim both are lies. > Pick a lane. God's choice. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqqq5b$her$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514431 |
On 8/16/2015 2:22 PM, duke wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:30:57 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:46:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:45:51 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:48:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:43:44 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:14 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:17 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>>>>>>>>> for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be >>>>>>>>>>>> unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist, >>>>>>>>>>>> narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh, you won't be in his presence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will >>>>>>>>>> be in his presence during the judgment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment. >>>>>>>>> I don't know. No man does. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But you claim he will and will not stand before God in judgment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Intelligent people are able to parse the difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps I'm not as intelligent as the world would have me >>>>>> believe. You'll need to explain to me how #2 will AND will not stand >>>>>> before God, at the same time. >>>>> >>>>> You're trying to split hairs. >>> >>>> You made both claims. Which one will you admit to being the lie? >>> >>> Neither. Those dying in mortal sin go immediately to the fires. >>> >> >> So you lied twice? Doesn't the Bible make reference to lying be a >> bad thing? > > No lying. > >>>>>>> I have no idea if God is in front of you at judgment or >>>>>>> behind you. But he is still the judge. >>>>> >>>>>> Except that, according to you, #2 will be exempt from seeing him >>>>>> (stand before) while being required to see him at the same time. >>>>>> Your position does not make any sense. >>>>> >>>>> Nor do I have any authority to answer. >>> >>>> You have the authority to state which of the two is the lie, >>>> since you stated both will happen. > >>> Neither. But you're not bright enough to understand. > >> Above you claim both are lies. >> Pick a lane. > > God's choice. > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** > Why?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 04:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6m93tatpf2ptebdq7rj3g1qe3js7dmeq50@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514431 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:22:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>>>>>Intelligent people are able to parse the difference.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps I'm not as intelligent as the world would have me
>>>>>>believe. You'll need to explain to me how #2 will AND will not stand
>>>>>>before God, at the same time.
>>>>>
>>>>>You're trying to split hairs.
>>>
>>>> You made both claims. Which one will you admit to being the lie?
>>>
>>>Neither. Those dying in mortal sin go immediately to the fires.
>>>
>>
>> So you lied twice? Doesn't the Bible make reference to lying be a
>>bad thing?
>
>No lying.
>
I'm certain it does claim lying is a bad thing. I'll look up
chapter and verse, if you'd like.
>>>>>>>I have no idea if God is in front of you at judgment or
>>>>>>>behind you. But he is still the judge.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Except that, according to you, #2 will be exempt from seeing him
>>>>>>(stand before) while being required to see him at the same time.
>>>>>> Your position does not make any sense.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nor do I have any authority to answer.
>>>
>>>> You have the authority to state which of the two is the lie,
>>>>since you stated both will happen.
>
>>>Neither. But you're not bright enough to understand.
>
>> Above you claim both are lies.
>> Pick a lane.
>
>God's choice.
We're discussing your claiming two opposed positions. Which one
will you admit to being the lie? Or is an honest answer just too
difficult for you?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 07:53 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <n97isa1kcbbjke4fd700r8hqi65qlocmo4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511819 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:17 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>>>> >>>>>If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be >>>>>unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist, >>>>>narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed. >>>> >>>>Oh, you won't be in his presence. >> >>> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will >>>be in his presence during the judgment. >> >>Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment. >>I don't know. No man does. >> > > But you claim he will and will not stand before God in judgment. > >>> In fact, you claim above, "...you will stand before God in >>>judgment." which is consistent with the claims of the Bible. But now >>>you are taking the position that he won't. >> >>>>You'll get the memo regarding our demise. >> >>> I'm going to presume you meant your demise. >>> Bar the Bible having lied, he wouldn't get a memo. It claims God >>>will tell people direct and in person. >> >>Yes, he will. > > So you lied about the memo. > Got it. > >>That's the least of your problems regarding what God's courtroom >>looks like. > > We're not discussing the physical appearance. We're currently >discussing your claim that #2 will, and will not, stand before God. At >the same time. It would be very nice if duke could keep even this little bit of his story straight. Shill #2 -- A man without religion is like a fish without a bicycle. Vique
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 04:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mjfjsa9ebn5krna04460ogmmmssgr2ji5g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512543 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:53:29 +1000, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:17 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be
>>>>>>unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist,
>>>>>>narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, you won't be in his presence.
>>>
>>>> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will
>>>>be in his presence during the judgment.
>>>
>>>Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment.
>>>I don't know. No man does.
>>
>> But you claim he will and will not stand before God in judgment.
>>
>>>> In fact, you claim above, "...you will stand before God in
>>>>judgment." which is consistent with the claims of the Bible. But now
>>>>you are taking the position that he won't.
>>>
>>>>>You'll get the memo regarding our demise.
>>>
>>>> I'm going to presume you meant your demise.
>>>> Bar the Bible having lied, he wouldn't get a memo. It claims God
>>>>will tell people direct and in person.
>>>
>>>Yes, he will.
>>
>> So you lied about the memo.
>> Got it.
>>
>>>That's the least of your problems regarding what God's courtroom
>>>looks like.
>>
>> We're not discussing the physical appearance. We're currently
>>discussing your claim that #2 will, and will not, stand before God. At
>>the same time.
>
>It would be very nice if duke could keep even this little bit of his story
>straight.
I can't claim expertise on his postings, but over the years I've
seen him in various discussions that get cross posted. He often uses
various means of avoidance, such as he's displayed here, when he's
been proved wrong about something.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 07:52 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d57isalf5a6nikit67q78skg7mjih5cqhe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511799 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:43:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:50:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:43:44 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>>> >>>>If it does happen, and I see no evidence to suspect that it will, it will be >>>>unpleasant. To be in the presence of such a genocidal, misogynistic, racist, >>>>narcissist would be very unpleasant indeed. >>> >>>Oh, you won't be in his presence. > >> If we accept the Bible as true, which you claim to, then #2 will >>be in his presence during the judgment. > >Sure, but alone are amongst the 10's of thousands that died at the same moment. >I don't know. No man does. Hang on! You just said "Oh, you won't be in his presence." and now you agree with Kwills that I will be in his presence? Are you an acrobat? You sure are flipping about a lot. Shill #2 -- Morality is doing what is right regardless of what you are told. Religion is doing what you are told regardless of what is right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 04:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o9m3sapn7huhugicff1b9ubgtspgml21o6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511219 |
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 03:15:07 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:38:23 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:49:42 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:16:29 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I think tali was a Jew.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Then you don't get it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I get it. The thing is, Tali's religion is not relevant to the
>>>>>>>>terms holy ghost and holy spirit being interchangeable. His believing
>>>>>>>>in its existence, or his not believing, is equally irrelevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That may be true. But the concepts are different. "Ghost" more normally brings
>>>>>>>visions of "ghostly" beings seen right thru, elevated movement, spooky, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>When we use the current term "Holy Spirit", we are experiencing God guiding us
>>>>>>>to love, right, good.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The same is true of the term holy ghost.
>>>>>> Just accept the terms are interchangeable and move on with your
>>>>>>life.
>>>>>
>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune
>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost.
>>>>
>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch
>>>>on.
>>>
>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine.
>
>> That makes no sense.
>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
>
>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I
hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing?
Why are you reduced to lying?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 13:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2pm4salc4pclej3cn5srr77e7i09l3ibg4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511327 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:36:58 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:59:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 03:15:07 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:38:23 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:49:42 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:16:29 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>[...] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I think tali was a Jew. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Then you don't get it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I get it. The thing is, Tali's religion is not relevant to the >>>>>>>>>terms holy ghost and holy spirit being interchangeable. His believing >>>>>>>>>in its existence, or his not believing, is equally irrelevant. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That may be true. But the concepts are different. "Ghost" more normally brings >>>>>>>>visions of "ghostly" beings seen right thru, elevated movement, spooky, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>When we use the current term "Holy Spirit", we are experiencing God guiding us >>>>>>>>to love, right, good. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The same is true of the term holy ghost. >>>>>>> Just accept the terms are interchangeable and move on with your >>>>>>>life. >>>>>> >>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune >>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost. >>>>> >>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch >>>>>on. >>>> >>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine. >> >>> That makes no sense. >>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning? >> >>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. > > I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I >hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing? > Why are you reduced to lying? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 04:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bl96satbgoairkeahp34k0v7is6bokgak8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511434 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune
>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch
>>>>>>on.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine.
>>>
>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
>>>
>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>>
>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I
>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing?
>> Why are you reduced to lying?
>
>
>the dukester, American-American
>
>*****
>"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
>Pope Paul VI
>*****
Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jk9asa1sbcrr82gnamsqh866s18l20b1fr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511538 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >[...] > >>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune >>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch >>>>>>>on. >>>>>> >>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine. >>>> >>>>> That makes no sense. >>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning? >>>> >>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I >>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing? >>> Why are you reduced to lying? > Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted. It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 18:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <60fasa95n9cv643pl2d4ksgr6nm2lqf2p3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511800 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:44:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune
>>>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine.
>>>>>
>>>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
>>>>>
>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>
>>>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I
>>>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing?
>>>> Why are you reduced to lying?
>
>> Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted.
>
>It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it.
>
Your continued inability to counter the truth that you lied is
noted.
Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad thing?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 13:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fmhcsah7di2hflh4opnbvq5osqn12a59c7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511820 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:44:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>[...] >>> >>>>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune >>>>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine. >>>>>> >>>>>>> That makes no sense. >>>>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning? >>>>>> >>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >> >>>>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I >>>>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing? >>>>> Why are you reduced to lying? >> >>> Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted. >> >>It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it. >> > > Your continued inability to counter the truth that you lied is >noted. > Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad thing? Children can do a better job than you do. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 09:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2ppesalq4uq5hdc98c6vninj81t0fr4rt6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511928 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:44:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune
>>>>>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>>>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>>>
>>>>>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I
>>>>>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing?
>>>>>> Why are you reduced to lying?
>>>
>>>> Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted.
>>>
>>>It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it.
>>
>> Your continued inability to counter the truth that you lied is
>>noted.
>> Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad thing?
>
>Children can do a better job than you do.
>
Well then,you are most fortunate there are no children here.
Why are you so afraid of answering the question I asked?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 12:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kcdksa9f89f9codh3fvtij5ruktj0afp5c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512109 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:44:11 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:44:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>[...] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune >>>>>>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch on. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That makes no sense. >>>>>>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>>> >>>>>>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I >>>>>>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing? >>>>>>> Why are you reduced to lying? >>>> >>>>> Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted. >>>> >>>>It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it. >>> >>> Your continued inability to counter the truth that you lied is >>>noted. >>> Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad thing? >> >>Children can do a better job than you do. > Well then,you are most fortunate there are no children here. > Why are you so afraid of answering the question I asked? Already answered. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 14:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g7kksa9fl11tc27bomumu32q1cf8jct32r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512748 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:49:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:44:11 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:44:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch on.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>>>>>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I
>>>>>>>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing?
>>>>>>>> Why are you reduced to lying?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it.
>>>>
>>>> Your continued inability to counter the truth that you lied is
>>>>noted.
>>>> Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad thing?
>>>
>>>Children can do a better job than you do.
>
>> Well then,you are most fortunate there are no children here.
>> Why are you so afraid of answering the question I asked?
>
>Already answered.
>
Your lying will not help you. If an honest answer is too
difficult for you, so be it. But don't lie and claim you've answered
the question I asked when you did not.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 11:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l7rusad4m355ev3qd0hn1d43q2ch495pcs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512807 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:46:26 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:49:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:44:11 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:44:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>[...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch on. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That makes no sense. >>>>>>>>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation >>>>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I >>>>>>>>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing? >>>>>>>>> Why are you reduced to lying? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted. >>>>>> >>>>>>It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it. >>>>> >>>>> Your continued inability to counter the truth that you lied is >>>>>noted. >>>>> Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad thing? >>>> >>>>Children can do a better job than you do. >> >>> Well then,you are most fortunate there are no children here. >>> Why are you so afraid of answering the question I asked? >> >>Already answered. >> > > Your lying will not help you. If an honest answer is too >difficult for you, so be it. But don't lie and claim you've answered >the question I asked when you did not. The honest answer is "no lying". the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 15:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4c8vsa1rcth6bi6ki8e6dalio49heed3n6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #513909 |
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:47:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:46:26 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:49:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:44:11 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:13:51 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:15:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:44:45 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 04:19:45 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:51:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>[...]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I fully understand both are terms, new and old, for the 3rd person of the triune
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Godhead. That's where you get lost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly I do not. I understood. It took you a few days to catch on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's your funeral to think about, not mine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That makes no sense.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you forget to take your meds this morning?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>You just don't believe you will stand before God in judgment. Serious situation
>>>>>>>>>>>for you. It's gonna happen. Won't be pleasant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've made no comment about what, if any, religious beliefs I
>>>>>>>>>>hold. Doesn't the Bible state that lying is a bad thing?
>>>>>>>>>> Why are you reduced to lying?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your inability to counter the truth that you lied is noted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's clear what you don't believe. If I can see it, for sure God can see it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your continued inability to counter the truth that you lied is
>>>>>>noted.
>>>>>> Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad thing?
>>>>>
>>>>>Children can do a better job than you do.
>>>
>>>> Well then,you are most fortunate there are no children here.
>>>> Why are you so afraid of answering the question I asked?
>>>
>>>Already answered.
>>
>> Your lying will not help you. If an honest answer is too
>>difficult for you, so be it. But don't lie and claim you've answered
>>the question I asked when you did not.
>
>The honest answer is "no lying".
I asked, "Doesn't the Bible say something about lying being a bad
thing?"
Your answer is, "No lying."
You're not making any sense.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 23 of 33 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 … 33 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web