Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #506321 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-11 11:02 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-07-28 17:27 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 644 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 11:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-12 09:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-13 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 07:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 09:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-15 12:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 14:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-16 13:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-17 05:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 10:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 14:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 22:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-17 22:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Rockinghorse Winner <rhorse@sonic.net> - 2015-07-18 16:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-18 18:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 07:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 14:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 22:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-17 19:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-18 20:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 07:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-19 21:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 19:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-20 17:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-19 21:07 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-20 19:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-21 22:39 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-21 17:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 21:12 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-23 22:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 12:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-22 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-22 17:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-22 16:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 17:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 23:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 18:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 12:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 19:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-20 17:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-23 16:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 06:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-21 10:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 11:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-21 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 17:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 03:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 07:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 05:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-23 05:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 07:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 11:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 11:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-23 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-22 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-23 11:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 13:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 11:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 12:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 11:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-23 13:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 13:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 23:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 12:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 01:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-08-01 18:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. (BS) tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2015-07-28 13:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 05:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 08:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 08:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 12:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 07:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 14:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 12:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 07:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 07:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 03:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 04:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 05:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 04:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 03:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 03:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 03:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 14:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 07:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 07:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 07:33 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 18:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:53 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:52 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 04:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 18:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 11:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 04:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 16:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 00:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 03:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 10:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 00:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 14:08 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 00:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 14:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 01:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 06:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-30 09:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 03:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:39 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:41 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 19:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 06:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 07:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-17 17:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 07:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-18 07:19 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-18 10:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 12:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-18 18:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 07:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 14:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 07:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 14:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-20 19:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-20 17:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-21 12:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-22 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-20 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-21 05:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 06:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-21 22:24 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-21 17:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-21 20:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 20:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-23 22:01 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:32 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-26 18:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-21 18:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 09:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-25 06:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 12:47 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 02:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 07:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-19 19:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 06:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 08:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-19 07:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 14:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 07:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-20 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-20 17:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-20 17:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-21 18:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 09:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-22 11:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-22 14:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 12:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 21:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-23 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 17:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 17:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 07:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 12:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 06:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 07:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 10:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 18:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 05:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 18:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 19:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:39 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Amanda Bush <jacke@nobody.com> - 2015-07-24 15:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 12:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 00:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 22:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 02:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 09:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 21:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-26 06:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-26 17:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 16:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 23:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 02:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-25 09:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-20 19:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 23:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-19 21:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-19 17:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-20 19:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-21 12:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-21 22:34 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-21 18:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-22 10:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-22 21:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-25 19:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-26 21:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:27 -0500
Page 11 of 33 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 33 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511857 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>> >>> etc. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>> > >>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>> connected to it? >>>>> >>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>> >>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>> >>>> >>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>> >>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >> >>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >changes it desired. For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >Making everything fit was an obvious goal. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8i5esahgll1hjrsvlcc5ubbdc6t9jf0sus@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #511933 |
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>> >>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>> >>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>> >>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. > >>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>changes it desired. > >For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports it's existence today. > >>It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >>Making everything fit was an obvious goal. > -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bvpesa9vkpdqnu3j4eumn8ps0tcvt7chne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512067 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>>> >>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>> >>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >> >>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>changes it desired. >> >>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. > >For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >it's existence today. Spiritual only. >>>It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >>>Making everything fit was an obvious goal. >> the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jargsalh8udf76kmua1sl1u1hpj4qvt591@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512112 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:47:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <bvpesa9vkpdqnu3j4eumn8ps0tcvt7chne@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>>>> >>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>> >>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>> >>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>changes it desired. >>> >>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >> >>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>it's existence today. > >Spiritual only. Everything. > >>>>It even decided what was included in it's mythology and what was not. >>>>Making everything fit was an obvious goal. >>> > -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512363 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:22:52 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:47:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><bvpesa9vkpdqnu3j4eumn8ps0tcvt7chne@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:00 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><81icsahv5n14qkpg5uqlupslcbmari6p8c@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:31:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><84aasa1s56j3db5ejho251a783s5ueood4@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:42:41 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:10:45 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><55C31685.54A6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:02:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <9g62sat66jooq00mg9ro6fktj8qmg7stdi@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:56:09 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>On 08/03/2015 02:42 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>> Prove the American War of Independence occurred. Same difference. No eye >>>>>>>>> >>> witnesses to testify. Just documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, >>>>>>>>> >>> etc. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>And third party verification (ie France), unlike your gospels. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >What 3rd party verification. I have the same types of verification for Jesus >>>>>>>>> >Christ - documents, accounts of others, paintings, artifacts, etc. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do you have that has absolutely no connection, directly or >>>>>>>>> indirectly, with your bible? Direct verified accounts or 'paintings' >>>>>>>>> by people who never heard of that bible or any person or organization >>>>>>>>> connected to it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What 'artifacts' what are independent of such sources? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you understand what 'independent' or 'verified' means? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>“Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to >>>>>>>>call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such >>>>>>>>men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of >>>>>>>>the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when >>>>>>>>Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned >>>>>>>>him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, >>>>>>>>for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine >>>>>>>>prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things >>>>>>>>concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not >>>>>>>>extinct at this day.” >>>>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>> >>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>> >>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>changes it desired. >>>> >>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>> >>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>it's existence today. >> >>Spiritual only. > >Everything. Spiritual. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ckslsal6babqa2h16upb7a0jbpjumqpl6f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512756 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:55:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>> >>>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>changes it desired. >>>>> >>>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>> >>>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>it's existence today. >>> >>>Spiritual only. >> >>Everything. > >Spiritual. > Everything. The first thought control and the first political organization. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 11:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nsrusa9joocaqoi8vc1r9edkdldv057pef@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512926 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:17:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:55:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>changes it desired. >>>>>> >>>>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>> >>>>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>it's existence today. >>>> >>>>Spiritual only. >>> >>>Everything. >> >>Spiritual. >> > >Everything. The first thought control and the first political >organization. God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 04:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qmg0talo6svt0ah0l2uaa82pq97hog5gii@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #513913 |
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <nsrusa9joocaqoi8vc1r9edkdldv057pef@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:17:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:55:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>changes it desired. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>> >>>>>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>it's existence today. >>>>> >>>>>Spiritual only. >>>> >>>>Everything. >>> >>>Spiritual. >>> >> >>Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>organization. > >God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. > You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual ever existed. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 14:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514151 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><nsrusa9joocaqoi8vc1r9edkdldv057pef@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:17:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:55:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>changes it desired. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>it's existence today. >>>>>> >>>>>>Spiritual only. >>>>> >>>>>Everything. >>>> >>>>Spiritual. >>>> >>> >>>Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>organization. >> >>God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >> > >You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >ever existed. Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 12:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mqqo1h0l67@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #514425 |
On 08/16/2015 12:19 PM, duke wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >> >ever existed. > Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. Fallacy of many questions. Does there need to be an alternative to God? That's the first question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 15:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqqq6s$her$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514425 |
On 8/16/2015 2:19 PM, duke wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <nsrusa9joocaqoi8vc1r9edkdldv057pef@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:17:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:55:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everything. >>>>> >>>>> Spiritual. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>> organization. >>> >>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>> >> >> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >> ever existed. > > Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** > Why?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <e7b3ta1fjvpdid3s0gi263j36f9c36frhc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514425 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><nsrusa9joocaqoi8vc1r9edkdldv057pef@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:17:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:55:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><qndksa9qm4b4fk86caba8vrvivib0o7q9p@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>changes it desired. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>it's existence today. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Spiritual only. >>>>>> >>>>>>Everything. >>>>> >>>>>Spiritual. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>organization. >>> >>>God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>> >> >>You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>ever existed. > >Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. > Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone bother with an alternative? Is an alternative to the Tooth Fairy really needed? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #514591 |
On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > alt.atheism with message-id > <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. >>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Everything. >>>>>> >>>>>> Spiritual. >>>>>> >>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>> organization. >>>> >>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>>> >>> >>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>> ever existed. >> >> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. >> > > Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone > bother with an alternative? God will SMITE you. > > Is an alternative to the Tooth Fairy really needed? Prepare to be SMITTEN BY GOD, non-believer !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 17:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-4F68C2.17582720082015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515429 |
In article <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org>, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > > alt.atheism with message-id > > <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered > >>>>>>>>>>>>> centuries > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 > >>>>>>>>>>>> years would have > >>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said > >>>>>>>>>>>> and did. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single > >>>>>>>>>>> organization > >>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make > >>>>>>>>>>> whatever > >>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. > > >>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that > >>>>>>>>> supports > >>>>>>>>> it's existence today. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Spiritual only. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Everything. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Spiritual. > >>>>>> > > >>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political > >>>>> organization. > >>>> > >>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. > >>>> > >>> > >>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual > >>> ever existed. > >> > >> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. > >> > > > > Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone > > bother with an alternative? > > God will SMITE you. > > > > > Is an alternative to the Tooth Fairy really needed? > > Prepare to be SMITTEN BY GOD, non-believer ! What god? Do you have any evidence that any such thing exists? Unless you have some evidence, your threats are childish. -- JD Išve officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 04:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9hpdtat6dtcsbo93coeduhc5q5slj5p8s7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515429 |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:40:47 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> wrote: >On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. > >>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Everything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Spiritual. >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>>> organization. >>>>> >>>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>>> ever existed. >>> >>> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. >>> >> >> Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone >> bother with an alternative? > >God will SMITE you. Bring it own. > >> >> Is an alternative to the Tooth Fairy really needed? > >Prepare to be SMITTEN BY GOD, non-believer ! > I quake in anticipation. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 13:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8ihhtatd46eh4gk19sr29ugdots5ogpge5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515517 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:50:28 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:40:47 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> in >alt.atheism with message-id <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> wrote: > >>On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id >>> <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Everything. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Spiritual. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>>>> organization. >>>>>> >>>>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>>>> ever existed. >>>> >>>> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. >>>> >>> >>> Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone >>> bother with an alternative? >> >>God will SMITE you. > >Bring it own. >I quake in anticipation. You're also going down. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 03:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ehuita54a969e8n267tdqah00g3d2kqqjg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515822 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:58:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <8ihhtatd46eh4gk19sr29ugdots5ogpge5@4ax.com> wrote: >On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:50:28 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:40:47 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> in >>alt.atheism with message-id <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> wrote: >> >>>On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: >>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Everything. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Spiritual. >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>>>>> organization. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>>>>> ever existed. >>>>> >>>>> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone >>>> bother with an alternative? >>> >>>God will SMITE you. >> >>Bring it own. >>I quake in anticipation. > >You're also going down. > Down where? Based on what? Include supporting evidence please - anyone can make empty threats. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 10:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <84qjtahepmcj5cuvnut7gesbc28un6637u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516001 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:46:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:58:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><8ihhtatd46eh4gk19sr29ugdots5ogpge5@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:50:28 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:40:47 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> wrote: >>> >>>>On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>> <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Everything. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Spiritual. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>>>>>> organization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>>>>>> ever existed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone >>>>> bother with an alternative? >>>> >>>>God will SMITE you. >>> >>>Bring it own. >>>I quake in anticipation. >> >>You're also going down. >Down where? Based on what? Include supporting evidence please - >anyone can make empty threats. You know - down. And anyone can make empty comments about not going down. It resolves itself in the end. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <84cktalt4fgnjguqoogkud5r4lebklh11b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516092 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:38:47 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <84qjtahepmcj5cuvnut7gesbc28un6637u@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:46:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:58:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><8ihhtatd46eh4gk19sr29ugdots5ogpge5@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:50:28 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:40:47 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Everything. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Spiritual. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>>>>>>> organization. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>>>>>>> ever existed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone >>>>>> bother with an alternative? >>>>> >>>>>God will SMITE you. >>>> >>>>Bring it own. >>>>I quake in anticipation. >>> >>>You're also going down. > >>Down where? Based on what? Include supporting evidence please - >>anyone can make empty threats. > >You know - down. And anyone can make empty comments about not going down. It >resolves itself in the end. > Empty threats renewed. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <igekta1aq5kq02l1trsld1c6sc85di2s0n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516001 |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 03:46:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:58:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><8ihhtatd46eh4gk19sr29ugdots5ogpge5@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:50:28 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:40:47 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id <mr53fv$pfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> wrote: >>> >>>>On 8/17/2015 4:45 AM, Attila wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:19:53 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>> <lgo1tahmuardkjveq5mr45ohi31pcmv2jt@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:00:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:58:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is the opinion of many scholars his writings were altered centuries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago to fit the necessary pattern. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that were true, the steady growth of Christianity for 2000 years would have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erupted in war over those that tried to change what Jesus said and did. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. For most of that time there was one single organization >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that had total control over the entire subject and could make whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes it desired. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose. The value is spiritual, not physical. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For the purpose of power and control. The same purpose that supports >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's existence today. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Spiritual only. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Everything. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Spiritual. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Everything. The first thought control and the first political >>>>>>>>> organization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> God calls for the spiritual, not the physical. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have yet to prove any god ever existed or that anything spiritual >>>>>>> ever existed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is ok because you can't present an alternative to God. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since you have never proven any god ever existed why would anyone >>>>> bother with an alternative? >>>> >>>>God will SMITE you. >>> >>>Bring it own. >>>I quake in anticipation. >> >>You're also going down. >> > >Down where? Based on what? Include supporting evidence please - >anyone can make empty threats. I think he meant you are going to the bottom floor, usually reserved for hardware, lawn maintence, and that kind of stiff although in some of the newer stores I guess they have been making small changes here and there and there is now bedding, furniture, and in a few places sometimes men or womens clothing or perhaps even both with a large assortment of funderwear and purfumes and oils and various nicknacks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 33 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 33 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web