Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #500034 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-14 15:49 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-06-23 17:08 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 144 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-15 07:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-15 08:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-15 13:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-15 21:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-15 23:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-16 12:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 00:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 19:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 21:33 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:17 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 00:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-16 18:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 19:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 23:41 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mattb. <Trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 02:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-18 11:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 12:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-22 09:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 19:28 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-18 06:12 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 22:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-18 22:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 06:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:14 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-22 09:27 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 16:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-24 08:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-23 20:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-24 03:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-25 07:55 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-26 08:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-27 08:21 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-27 11:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-24 19:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-24 14:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 22:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 05:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 12:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 05:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-25 07:58 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-26 08:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 14:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 21:59 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 16:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 13:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 17:05 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-22 19:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-24 08:54 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 22:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 21:57 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 16:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:13 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 06:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:03 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 17:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-24 19:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-25 21:13 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-26 16:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-27 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-27 10:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-27 20:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 09:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-28 08:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 17:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-27 20:04 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 09:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-28 19:55 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 17:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 14:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 21:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 14:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 21:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 17:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-18 01:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 02:29 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 21:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:54 -0500
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 00:23 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 06:24 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jane@home.. - 2015-06-20 21:05 +1000
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 07:31 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-20 05:50 -0700
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 09:41 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jane@home.. - 2015-06-21 09:46 +1000
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 07:05 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-20 05:24 -0700
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 08:29 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 12:07 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-22 07:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 21:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 22:19 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 17:08 -0500
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-24 14:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hd0moaltt3bc0826p10v5hkru815p45t3v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #502210 |
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:12:35 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/23/2015 10:06 PM, benj wrote: >> >> poor Henry. He thinks he's a monkey and then tried to prove it by >> emulating the monkey IQ. As an animal he doesn't know that all actions >> begin with a thought. > > >When a rockslide occurs, what thoughts preceded that action? Only henry knows. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-24 14:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hsvloatcith1g5hh78k2515qo2pisvi6o3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #502139 |
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:50:54 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:56:47 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:27:34 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:58:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>>>>One big nuke there would solve half the world's problems. Another one on >>>>>Jerusalem would solve the other half. >>>> >>>>Why? Will it take you, the dumb one, out? >> >>>Why would it matter. When I'm dead that's the end of me. I wont be alive to >>>care if I'm dead or alive. I certainly wont have to share an afterlife with >>>any boring hypocrites like you. >> >>Interesting that this clown tried, just a week or so ago, to convince everyone >>that there is not God. Now it appears he understands God does live amongst us >>but can blow it off with no impact on him. >> >>Folded like a wet noodle. > >Poor fellow, duke. He's desperately trying to find just one piece of evidence >for his silly god idea. Strangely, you keep saying that. And yet, you still don't get what I said. >Meanwhile he's just wasting his life away going to his 'mass' every morning >and praying that something good will happen while all normal men are out doing >something useful. Wasting my time???? Haahaahaa. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 07:58 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <8t9moadm5kso1dkrkbt830suafoks2lfsn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #502307 |
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:12:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:50:54 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >>Poor fellow, duke. He's desperately trying to find just one piece of evidence >>for his silly god idea. > >Strangely, you keep saying that. And yet, you still don't get what I said. > >>Meanwhile he's just wasting his life away going to his 'mass' every morning >>and praying that something good will happen while all normal men are out doing >>something useful. > >Wasting my time???? Haahaahaa. How much money do you kmake, dook, selling tickets to heaven? >the dukester, American-American >***** __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 13:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4kiooa9t0i7r8u4iq90gl887un1fsecl9f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #502340 |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 07:58:08 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:12:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:50:54 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: > >>>Poor fellow, duke. He's desperately trying to find just one piece of evidence >>>for his silly god idea. >> >>Strangely, you keep saying that. And yet, you still don't get what I said. >> >>>Meanwhile he's just wasting his life away going to his 'mass' every morning >>>and praying that something good will happen while all normal men are out doing >>>something useful. >> >>Wasting my time???? Haahaahaa. > >How much money do you kmake, dook, selling tickets to heaven? Wow, you have become a major nobody. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-26 08:51 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <2f1poadkohlgf6ne9fjum57ohdb3549ptr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #502471 |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>Poor fellow, duke. He's desperately trying to find just one piece of evidence >>>>for his silly god idea. >>> >>>Strangely, you keep saying that. And yet, you still don't get what I said. >>> >>>>Meanwhile he's just wasting his life away going to his 'mass' every morning >>>>and praying that something good will happen while all normal men are out doing >>>>something useful. >>> >>>Wasting my time???? Haahaahaa. >> >>How much money do you kmake, dook, selling tickets to heaven? > >Wow, you have become a major nobody. I would have to if I wanted to join you. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-26 17:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1njroadfnrbo7cavt6dach8smu27km1eho@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #502553 |
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:51:56 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>>>>Poor fellow, duke. He's desperately trying to find just one piece of evidence >>>>>for his silly god idea. >>>> >>>>Strangely, you keep saying that. And yet, you still don't get what I said. >>>> >>>>>Meanwhile he's just wasting his life away going to his 'mass' every morning >>>>>and praying that something good will happen while all normal men are out doing >>>>>something useful. >>>> >>>>Wasting my time???? Haahaahaa. >>> >>>How much money do you kmake, dook, selling tickets to heaven? >> >>Wow, you have become a major nobody. > >I would have to if I wanted to join you. I'll let God decide. > >Henry Wilson DSc. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 16:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n5d6oah4rn1l3t0peor07761hdrl9tc2tq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #500774 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching >> >> >100% >> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to still >> >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. >> >> >You're >> >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. >> >> >> >> You too. >> > >> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good >> >as >> >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >> >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >> >> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate definition >> of >> one first. > >You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for it, >when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify something >that isn't even defined. Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that declare evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence must be. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-19 19:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm1qlo$3rq$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #501034 |
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:15:56 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" > <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > >>"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >>news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >>> >>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>> >>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>> >>> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >>> >> >approaching 100% >>> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to >>> >> >still harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to >>> >> >see it. You're destined to remain deluded for the rest of your >>> >> >life. >>> >> >>> >> You too. >>> > >>> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as >>> >good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the >>> >virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>> >>> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >>> definition of one first. >> >>You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for >>it, when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify >>something that isn't even defined. > > Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that declare > evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence > must be. Then you must accept that my sincere and strongly held belief that you owe me $60 million is evidence of that debt. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence must be. Repayment is due at the end of this month. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 09:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qttaoap60fumk9joop9amedt18q3i5f224@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #501274 |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:15:56 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" >> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >> >>>"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >>>news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >>>> >>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>> >>>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>> >>>> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >>>> >> >approaching 100% >>>> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to >>>> >> >still harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to >>>> >> >see it. You're destined to remain deluded for the rest of your >>>> >> >life. >>>> >> >>>> >> You too. >>>> > >>>> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as >>>> >good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the >>>> >virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>>> >>>> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >>>> definition of one first. >>> >>>You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for >>>it, when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify >>>something that isn't even defined. >> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that declare >> evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence >> must be. >Then you must accept that my sincere and strongly held belief that you owe >me $60 million is evidence of that debt. My evidence is my evidence. You >can't tell me what evidence must be. You must first offer the evidence equivalent to the creation to confirm that your evidence is valid. >Repayment is due at the end of this month. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 20:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm4hmc$s1o$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #501438 |
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:27:14 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:15:56 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>> >>>>"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >>>>news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>> >>>>> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >>>>> >> >approaching 100% >>>>> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to >>>>> >> >still harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live >>>>> >> >to see it. You're destined to remain deluded for the rest of >>>>> >> >your life. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> You too. >>>>> > >>>>> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as >>>>> >good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the >>>>> >virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>>>> >>>>> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >>>>> definition of one first. >>>> >>>>You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for >>>>it, when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify >>>>something that isn't even defined. > >>> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that >>> declare evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what >>> evidence must be. > >>Then you must accept that my sincere and strongly held belief that you >>owe me $60 million is evidence of that debt. My evidence is my evidence. >>You can't tell me what evidence must be. > > You must first offer the evidence equivalent to the creation to confirm > that your evidence is valid. As there is no evidence for any creation, I have easily fulfilled that requirement. >>Repayment is due at the end of this month. For your sake, I hope that the repayment is made on time. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-21 14:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rr5eoa9lk4t9n87uvcm7ieibl73totehon@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #501534 |
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:16:12 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:27:14 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:15:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >>>>>> >> >approaching 100% >>>>>> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to >>>>>> >> >still harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live >>>>>> >> >to see it. You're destined to remain deluded for the rest of >>>>>> >> >your life. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> You too. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as >>>>>> >good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the >>>>>> >virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >>>>>> definition of one first. >>>>> >>>>>You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for >>>>>it, when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify >>>>>something that isn't even defined. >> >>>> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that >>>> declare evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what >>>> evidence must be. >> >>>Then you must accept that my sincere and strongly held belief that you >>>owe me $60 million is evidence of that debt. My evidence is my evidence. >>>You can't tell me what evidence must be. >> >> You must first offer the evidence equivalent to the creation to confirm >> that your evidence is valid. >As there is no evidence for any creation, I have easily fulfilled that >requirement. If there was no creation, why are we here? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-21 21:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm7c3n$7sv$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #501712 |
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:59:24 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:16:12 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:27:14 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:15:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >>>>>>> >> >approaching 100% >>>>>>> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd >>>>>>> >> >to still harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't >>>>>>> >> >live to see it. You're destined to remain deluded for the rest >>>>>>> >> >of your life. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> You too. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is >>>>>>> >as good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the >>>>>>> >virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >>>>>>> definition of one first. >>>>>> >>>>>>You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked >>>>>>for it, when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I >>>>>>falsify something that isn't even defined. >>> >>>>> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that >>>>> declare evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me >>>>> what evidence must be. >>> >>>>Then you must accept that my sincere and strongly held belief that you >>>>owe me $60 million is evidence of that debt. My evidence is my >>>>evidence. >>>>You can't tell me what evidence must be. >>> >>> You must first offer the evidence equivalent to the creation to >>> confirm that your evidence is valid. > >>As there is no evidence for any creation, I have easily fulfilled that >>requirement. > > If there was no creation, why are we here? By a mistake of nature, in your case. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-23 16:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hhljoa1snj3kg17vpak8ira5ke1br159n6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #501744 |
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 21:59:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:59:24 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:16:12 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:27:14 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:15:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>>>>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >>>>>>>> >> >approaching 100% >>>>>>>> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd >>>>>>>> >> >to still harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't >>>>>>>> >> >live to see it. You're destined to remain deluded for the rest >>>>>>>> >> >of your life. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> You too. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is >>>>>>>> >as good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the >>>>>>>> >virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >>>>>>>> definition of one first. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked >>>>>>>for it, when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I >>>>>>>falsify something that isn't even defined. >>>> >>>>>> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that >>>>>> declare evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me >>>>>> what evidence must be. >>>> >>>>>Then you must accept that my sincere and strongly held belief that you >>>>>owe me $60 million is evidence of that debt. My evidence is my >>>>>evidence. >>>>>You can't tell me what evidence must be. >>>> >>>> You must first offer the evidence equivalent to the creation to >>>> confirm that your evidence is valid. >> >>>As there is no evidence for any creation, I have easily fulfilled that >>>requirement. >> >> If there was no creation, why are we here? > >By a mistake of nature, in your case. Well, the good news is that you are here for the same reason. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 13:55 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <558554c1$0$23233$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #501034 |
"duke" skrev i meddelelsen news:n5d6oah4rn1l3t0peor07761hdrl9tc2tq@4ax.com... > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > wrote: > > >"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen > >news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... > >> > >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" > >> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >> > >> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are > >> >> >approaching > >> >> >100% > >> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to > >> >> >still > >> >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. > >> >> >You're > >> >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. > >> >> > >> >> You too. > >> > > >> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as > >> >good > >> >as > >> >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. > >> >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > >> > >> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate > >> definition > >> of > >> one first. > > > >You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for it, > >when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify > >something > >that isn't even defined. > > Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that declare > evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence > must be. You might be right about there being a creator, but 'your evidence' doesn't support it. All you have are assertions and any 'positives' are coincidental. -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 09:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <j2uaoap8atfmba2c5lni6plgrqan6bt9ac@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #501417 |
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:55:50 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >news:n5d6oah4rn1l3t0peor07761hdrl9tc2tq@4ax.com... >> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >> >news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >> >> >> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >> >> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >> >> >> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >> >> >> >approaching >> >> >> >100% >> >> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to >> >> >> >still >> >> >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. >> >> >> >You're >> >> >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. >> >> >> >> >> >> You too. >> >> > >> >> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as >> >> >good >> >> >as >> >> >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >> >> >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >> >> >> >> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >> >> definition >> >> of >> >> one first. >> > >> >You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for it, >> >when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify >> >something >> >that isn't even defined. >> >> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that declare >> evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence >> must be. > >You might be right about there being a creator, but 'your evidence' doesn't >support it. All you have are assertions and any 'positives' are >coincidental. Then all you have to do is tell me "why are me". How can all exist without being created? Why doe the universe come about and what did it look like 13.7 billions years minus 300,000 years. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 17:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5585814e$0$23217$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #501439 |
"duke" skrev i meddelelsen news:j2uaoap8atfmba2c5lni6plgrqan6bt9ac@4ax.com... > > On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:55:50 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > wrote: > > >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >news:n5d6oah4rn1l3t0peor07761hdrl9tc2tq@4ax.com... > >> > >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" > >> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen > >> >news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" > >> >> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >> >> > >> >> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are > >> >> >> >approaching > >> >> >> >100% > >> >> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to > >> >> >> >still > >> >> >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see > >> >> >> >it. > >> >> >> >You're > >> >> >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> You too. > >> >> > > >> >> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as > >> >> >good > >> >> >as > >> >> >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual > >> >> >100%. > >> >> >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > >> >> > >> >> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate > >> >> definition > >> >> of > >> >> one first. > >> > > >> >You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for > >> >it, > >> >when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify > >> >something > >> >that isn't even defined. > >> > >> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that > >> declare > >> evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence > >> must be. > > > >You might be right about there being a creator, but 'your evidence' > >doesn't > >support it. All you have are assertions and any 'positives' are > >coincidental. > > Then all you have to do is tell me "why are me". ... Assuming you mean "why are we", I'll let this brilliant young woman explain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbpovdjdDpc Wait for contestant no. 3. (snip) -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-21 15:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9t5eoati9fc51cddtjpvkescu3gqgi34es@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #501452 |
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:05:56 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >news:j2uaoap8atfmba2c5lni6plgrqan6bt9ac@4ax.com... >> >> On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:55:50 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >news:n5d6oah4rn1l3t0peor07761hdrl9tc2tq@4ax.com... >> >> >> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:36:02 +0200, "Malte Runz" >> >> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen >> >> >news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" >> >> >> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are >> >> >> >> >approaching >> >> >> >> >100% >> >> >> >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to >> >> >> >> >still >> >> >> >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see >> >> >> >> >it. >> >> >> >> >You're >> >> >> >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You too. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as >> >> >> >good >> >> >> >as >> >> >> >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual >> >> >> >100%. >> >> >> >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >> >> >> >> >> >> I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate >> >> >> definition >> >> >> of >> >> >> one first. >> >> > >> >> >You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for >> >> >it, >> >> >when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify >> >> >something >> >> >that isn't even defined. >> >> >> >> Your problem is that you demand to establish the parameters that >> >> declare >> >> evidence. My evidence is my evidence. You can't tell me what evidence >> >> must be. >> > >> >You might be right about there being a creator, but 'your evidence' >> >doesn't >> >support it. All you have are assertions and any 'positives' are >> >coincidental. >> >> Then all you have to do is tell me "why are me". ... > >Assuming you mean "why are we", I'll let this brilliant young woman explain: >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbpovdjdDpc >Wait for contestant no. 3. Yes, why are we. Why do we exist? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-22 19:38 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <bplfoa1b3o2f9nrle2rphhugmj8r8gctr5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #501713 |
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:00:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:05:56 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>Assuming you mean "why are we", I'll let this brilliant young woman explain: >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbpovdjdDpc >>Wait for contestant no. > >Yes, why are we. Why do we exist? Science has revealed half the story...if you're patient enough the other half will come out eventually. In the meantime stop making silly guesses. You just sound like an idiot. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-23 16:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oiljoalmc54vbs2uq38tmd5gq9eumjtipi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #501790 |
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:38:55 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 15:00:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:05:56 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > >>>Assuming you mean "why are we", I'll let this brilliant young woman explain: >>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbpovdjdDpc >>>Wait for contestant no. >> >>Yes, why are we. Why do we exist? > >Science has revealed half the story...if you're patient enough the other half >will come out eventually. In the meantime stop making silly guesses. You just >sound like an idiot. What half is that and what half is yet to come? >Henry Wilson DSc. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-24 08:54 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <7pojoapt7jb0ei713q3934t0i1algtekf2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #502115 |
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:58:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:38:55 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >>>Yes, why are we. Why do we exist? >> >>Science has revealed half the story...if you're patient enough the other half >>will come out eventually. In the meantime stop making silly guesses. You just >>sound like an idiot. > >What half is that and what half is yet to come? Well, in some cases, it is already known. Take a flash of lightning, for instance....but I suppose you still think you god is responsible >>Henry Wilson DSc. > >the dukester, American-American > >***** >"The Mass is the most perfect form of making money out of gullible idiots." >Pope Paul VI >***** __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web