Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #515846 > unrolled thread

Are there electrons that are different?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <dwuih2ht@djh3jg3ugh08.org> - 2015-08-22 20:28 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:34 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:41 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:16 -0500
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:23 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:31 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 11:17 -0400
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:46 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 20:44 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:54 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:11 -0500
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:22 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:29 -0500
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:33 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:35 -0500
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:38 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:00 -0700
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:11 -0400
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:54 -0400
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:41 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:28 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:17 +0200
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:25 +0000
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:40 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:51 +0200
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:03 +0000
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:07 -0500
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:10 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:24 +0000
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:59 +0000
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:12 -0700
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:14 -0700
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-26 10:51 -0700
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 20:35 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 15:54 +0000
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:45 +0000
                              Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:08 +0000
                                Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:18 +0000
                                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:46 +0000
                                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:10 +0000
                                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:53 +0000
                                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
                                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:45 +0000
                                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:43 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:13 +0000
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-26 02:20 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 20:55 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:02 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:08 -0500
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:11 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:13 -0500
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:43 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:43 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:54 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:47 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:35 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 15:51 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:05 -0700
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:15 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:20 -0700
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:56 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:08 +0200
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:30 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:15 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-23 06:44 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:55 +0200
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:18 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:27 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:40 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-23 17:06 +1000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:53 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:55 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 19:27 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:44 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:25 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 16:18 -0400
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:40 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:20 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0400
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:54 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 16:53 -0700
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:23 -0400
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:11 -0500
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:18 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:24 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:40 -0500
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:55 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:18 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:32 +0200
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:33 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:59 +0200
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:06 +0000
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:06 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 12:02 -0400
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:09 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:16 +0200
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0000
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0200
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:46 +0000
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:52 +0200
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:03 +0000
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:04 +0200
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:21 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:14 -0700
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 13:48 -0400

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →

#516469

*/Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:

> The ’nym-shifting troll posting as "James Birdy" amok-crossposted:
> 
>> */Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:
>>> James Birdy amok-crossposted:
>>>> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
>>>>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity
>>>>>    is low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door
>>>>>    knobs.
>>>> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same
>>>> potential.
>>> 
>>> You have it backwards.  It is the soles of shoes that continuously
>>> cause friction, and thereby static electricity (separation of charges)
>>> in the first place.  It is the insulating rubber that prevents
>>> immediate electric discharge (balancing of charges), so the static
>>> electricity builds up (in the body).  It is the non-insulating hand
>>> that allows electrical discharge,
>> 
>> That's exactly what is been said,
> 
> Not by you.  You *denied* that one would “get a lot more electron into
> "your system"” by getting “zapped touching animals and door knobs”
> (under said conditions).  Because you replied to that claim: “you can’t,
> wearing your thick insulator shoes” and blathered something about “same
> potential”
> (which is the opposite of what is happening: if the potential were the
> same, there would not be a build-up of static electricity *with* rubber
> shoes; *insulating* rubber shoes are used *in the laboratory*, for a
> quite *different* purpose – you are confusing the facts).
> 
> So yes, you *can*, and you were *wrong*.  It is possible (though
> unlikely, given your history here) that you denied the claim because you
> did not understand what was being claimed (I have already told you that
> you have an abysmally low understanding of English and physics), but
> that does not make your denial disappear.
> 
> PointedEars

Reread my post, you bleep bleep. You are the one inadequate and 
unprepared. The proof for this is also, that you write much and 
insignificant. Write less. I stop reading right after your first stupid 
thing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516480

On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 11:51:55 AM UTC-4, James Birdy wrote:
> */Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:
> 
> > The 'nym-shifting troll posting as "James Birdy" amok-crossposted:

Thanks pointing that out for that Thomas. I was getting tired.

> >> */Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:
> >>> James Birdy amok-crossposted:
> >>>> */Sam Wormley/* wrote:
> >>>>>    You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the humidity
> >>>>>    is low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and door
> >>>>>    knobs.
> >>>> You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows, as being at same
> >>>> potential.
> >>> 
> >>> You have it backwards.  It is the soles of shoes that continuously
> >>> cause friction, and thereby static electricity (separation of charges)
> >>> in the first place.  It is the insulating rubber that prevents
> >>> immediate electric discharge (balancing of charges), so the static
> >>> electricity builds up (in the body).  It is the non-insulating hand
> >>> that allows electrical discharge,
> >> 
> >> That's exactly what is been said,
> > 
> > Not by you.  You *denied* that one would "get a lot more electron into
> > "your system"" by getting "zapped touching animals and door knobs"
> > (under said conditions).  Because you replied to that claim: "you can't,
> > wearing your thick insulator shoes" and blathered something about "same
> > potential"
> > (which is the opposite of what is happening: if the potential were the
> > same, there would not be a build-up of static electricity *with* rubber
> > shoes; *insulating* rubber shoes are used *in the laboratory*, for a
> > quite *different* purpose - you are confusing the facts).
> > 
> > So yes, you *can*, and you were *wrong*.  It is possible (though
> > unlikely, given your history here) that you denied the claim because you
> > did not understand what was being claimed (I have already told you that
> > you have an abysmally low understanding of English and physics), but
> > that does not make your denial disappear.
> > 
> > PointedEars
> 
> Reread my post, you bleep bleep. You are the one inadequate and 
> unprepared. The proof for this is also, that you write much and 
> insignificant. Write less. I stop reading right after your first stupid 
> thing.

Hey Birdy, I'm Virdy! How you doing? Long time... who you've been?

To be precisely accurate, Thomas Lahn uses fewer words than you do use
nym shifting identities BirdyBrain.

-- Mahipal '@#BirdyBrainNotOnTweetItHereJustNowBeReal' Virdy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516486

*/Mahipal/* wrote:

>> Reread my post, you bleep bleep. You are the one inadequate and
>> unprepared. The proof for this is also, that you write much and
>> insignificant. Write less. I stop reading right after your first stupid
>> thing.
> 
> Hey Birdy, I'm Virdy! How you doing? Long time... who you've been?
> 
> To be precisely accurate, Thomas Lahn uses fewer words than you do use
> nym shifting identities BirdyBrain.

Bleep bleep, mahipal. I can't make it shorter. Your name is just as bleep 
stupid "pointedears" is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516523

On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 12:15:10 PM UTC-4, James Birdy wrote:
> */Mahipal/* wrote:
> 
> >> Reread my post, you bleep bleep. You are the one inadequate and
> >> unprepared. The proof for this is also, that you write much and
> >> insignificant. Write less. I stop reading right after your first stupid
> >> thing.
> > 
> > Hey Birdy, I'm Virdy! How you doing? Long time... who you've been?
> > 
> > To be precisely accurate, Thomas Lahn uses fewer words than you do use
> > nym shifting identities BirdyBrain.
> 
> Bleep bleep, mahipal. I can't make it shorter. Your name is just as bleep 
> stupid "pointedears" is.

My name is Mahipal, use the proper Capitalization, since you also lost an as.

I read Thomas all the time, his contributions are teachable moments.

-- Mahipal 'Just because humans can misspell, does not mean they should.'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516565

*/Mahipal/* wrote:

> I read Thomas all the time, his contributions are teachable moments.

Which just reveals your level in stupidity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516485

The ’nym-shifting troll amok-crossposted as "James Birdy":

> */Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:
>> […]  You *denied* that one would “get a lot more electron into
>> "your system"” by getting “zapped touching animals and door knobs”
>> (under said conditions).  Because you replied to that claim: “you can’t,
>> wearing your thick insulator shoes” and blathered something about “same
>> potential” (which is the opposite of what is happening: if the potential 
>> were the same, there would not be a build-up of static electricity *with* 
>> rubber shoes; *insulating* rubber shoes are used *in the laboratory*, for 
>> a quite *different* purpose – you are confusing the facts). […]
> 
> Reread my post, you […]

Again, for the intellectual protozoa among us.

Facts:

- Sam said: “You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the 
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  humidity is low in winter and you get zapped touching animals and
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  door knobs.”

- You denied that: “You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows,
                    ^^^^^^^^^
  as being at same potential.”

Analysis:

What you posted was such nonsense that it was not even wrong.


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516494

*/Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:

> - Sam said: “You get a lot more electron into "your system" when the
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> humidity is low in winter and you get zapped touching animals
> and                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   door knobs.”
> 
> - You denied that: “You can't, wearing your thick insulator shows,
>                     ^^^^^^^^^
>   as being at same potential.”
> 
> Analysis:
> What you posted was such nonsense that it was not even wrong.

What a cretin. I meant the phenomenon posed as original. And yes, no 
electron pass from Ground into your body by wearing insulator shoes (all 
shoes nowadays are insulators). Even touching 10kV DC or the 220 V AC (by 
one hand)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515870

Dne 22/08/2015 v 22:28 James Birdy napsal(a):
> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking 
> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood, electrically, 
> the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from Earth are 
> getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial as they did in 
> old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are using shoes, which 
> might be seen as a barrier for the free natural electrons (charge carriers)
> 

All electrons are the same at the same conditions.
The point is, they are not at the same conditions.

They are at different potentials, depending where they are.

Earth surface is usually negatively charged,
and if we are well isolated,
we are exposed to more positive potential
due atmospheric electrostatic gradient.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515874

*/Poutnik/* wrote:

> Dne 22/08/2015 v 22:28 James Birdy napsal(a):
>> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking
>> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood,
>> electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from
>> Earth are getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial
>> as they did in old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are
>> using shoes, which might be seen as a barrier for the free natural
>> electrons (charge carriers)
>> 
> All electrons are the same at the same conditions.
> The point is, they are not at the same conditions.
> They are at different potentials, depending where they are.
> Earth surface is usually negatively charged,
> and if we are well isolated,
> we are exposed to more positive potential due atmospheric electrostatic
> gradient.

This has to be a correct observation Poutnik. Thank you for that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515975

Am 22.08.2015 23:15, schrieb Poutnik:

>> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking
>> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood, electrically,
>> the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from Earth are
>> getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial as they did in
>> old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are using shoes, which
>> might be seen as a barrier for the free natural electrons (charge carriers)
>>
>
> All electrons are the same at the same conditions.
> The point is, they are not at the same conditions.
>
> They are at different potentials, depending where they are.
>
> Earth surface is usually negatively charged,
> and if we are well isolated,
> we are exposed to more positive potential
> due atmospheric electrostatic gradient.
>

Now the question:

does a negative charge or a positive charge provide more benefits for 
the human health?

As rough estimate, drawn from my own (not very systematic) observations, 
I would prefer positive charge.

So: insulation (by means of shoes) would actually enhance health. And 
walking barefoot would make you loose 'valuable' ions ;-)


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516004

Dne 22/08/2015 v 23:15 Poutnik napsal(a):
> Dne 22/08/2015 v 22:28 James Birdy napsal(a):
>> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking 
>> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood, electrically, 
>> the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from Earth are 
>> getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial as they did in 
>> old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are using shoes, which 
>> might be seen as a barrier for the free natural electrons (charge carriers)
>>
> 
> All electrons are the same at the same conditions.
> The point is, they are not at the same conditions.
> 
> They are at different potentials, depending where they are.
> 
> Earth surface is usually negatively charged,
> and if we are well isolated,
> we are exposed to more positive potential
> due atmospheric electrostatic gradient.
> 
Of course, as Thomas said,
major factor in context of human body is friction.

There is also additional effect
of charge reversal near cumulonimbus at storms.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516025

Dne 23/08/2015 v 09:55 Poutnik napsal(a):
> Dne 22/08/2015 v 23:15 Poutnik napsal(a):
>> Dne 22/08/2015 v 22:28 James Birdy napsal(a):
>>> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking 
>>> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood, electrically, 
>>> the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from Earth are 
>>> getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial as they did in 
>>> old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are using shoes, which 
>>> might be seen as a barrier for the free natural electrons (charge carriers)
>>>
>>
>> All electrons are the same at the same conditions.
>> The point is, they are not at the same conditions.
>>
>> They are at different potentials, depending where they are.
>>
>> Earth surface is usually negatively charged,
>> and if we are well isolated,
>> we are exposed to more positive potential
>> due atmospheric electrostatic gradient.
>>
> Of course, as Thomas said,
> major factor in context of human body is friction.
> 
> There is also additional effect
> of charge reversal near cumulonimbus at storms.
> 
P.S.: There are large scale charge atmospheric patterns
superimposed by local friction patterns.

The former cause bigger differences,
but as the gradients are much weaker then at the latter,
the observed local effect is usually much weaker as well.
( with few exceptions like lightnings or St. Elmo's fire.)

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble,
but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515873

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:28:44 +0000, James Birdy wrote:

> I hear stories that walking 
> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits.
>

Here is something they make just for asshole idiots like you:

http://www.amazon.com/Magnetic-Foot-Insoles-Magnet-Inserts/dp/B001B3PO3S

So get out your credit card, sucker, and buy 'em by the case.

Dumb-fuck fool.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515877

*/Fabian Russell/* wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:28:44 +0000, James Birdy wrote:
> 
>> I hear stories that walking barefoot has surprisingly health benefits.
>>
> Here is something they make just for asshole idiots like you:
> http://www.amazon.com/Magnetic-Foot-Insoles-Magnet-Inserts/dp/B001B3PO3S
> So get out your credit card, sucker, and buy 'em by the case.

I see you bought yourself already that. Otherwise how would you possibly 
know. You must be a real cretin, not a one trying to just mimic one.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515905

James Birdy wrote:

> Are there electrons that are different?

Yes.

> I hear stories that walking barefoot has surprisingly health benefits.

It does.  But non sequitur.

> As I understood, electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away, the
> electrons from Earth are getting up into your system.

Not even wrong.  Now go away, 'nym-shifting troll.


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515994

On 23/08/2015 6:28 AM, James Birdy wrote:
> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking
> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood, electrically,
> the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from Earth are
> getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial as they did in
> old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are using shoes, which
> might be seen as a barrier for the free natural electrons (charge carriers)
>

Even had it been the case that electrons got taken up by bare feet (a 
highly improbable scenario), they would have migrated to the surface of 
the skin [*], which consists of dead tissue. Apart from repelling the 
odd blood-sucking insect that had happened to have acquired a negative 
charge, it's hard to see what benefit could have accrued.

Sylvia.

[*] The net charge of any electrically conductive object is expressed on 
its surface because of electric repulsion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516446

*/Sylvia Else/* wrote:

> On 23/08/2015 6:28 AM, James Birdy wrote:
>> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking
>> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood,
>> electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons from
>> Earth are getting up into your system. Performing whatever beneficial
>> as they did in old ages (millions of years). I mean, only humans are
>> using shoes, which might be seen as a barrier for the free natural
>> electrons (charge carriers)
>>
>>
> Even had it been the case that electrons got taken up by bare feet (a
> highly improbable scenario), they would have migrated to the surface of
> the skin [*], which consists of dead tissue. Apart from repelling the
> odd blood-sucking insect that had happened to have acquired a negative
> charge, it's hard to see what benefit could have accrued.
> 
> Sylvia.

Dear Sylvia. You are severely uneducated. What you just said is just so 
wrong. Human body has a Resistance, which accordingly its adherent 
Resistivity decrease with the contact surface/area, say for now, in the 
region of 500kOhm. (the palm of two feet is a quite large contact area).

More over the Static positive Potential of the body may rise up to MANY 
kilovolts!

> [*] The net charge of any electrically conductive object is expressed on
> its surface because of electric repulsion.

Not sure. Or I can't understand.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516449

*/James Birdy/* wrote:

> */Sylvia Else/* wrote:
> 
>> On 23/08/2015 6:28 AM, James Birdy wrote:
>>> Are there electrons that are different? I hear stories that walking
>>> barefoot has surprisingly health benefits. As I understood,
>>> electrically, the insulator of the shoes taken away, the electrons
>>> from Earth are getting up into your system. Performing whatever
>>> beneficial as they did in old ages (millions of years). I mean, only
>>> humans are using shoes, which might be seen as a barrier for the free
>>> natural electrons (charge carriers)
>>>
>>>
>> Even had it been the case that electrons got taken up by bare feet (a
>> highly improbable scenario), they would have migrated to the surface of
>> the skin [*], which consists of dead tissue. Apart from repelling the
>> odd blood-sucking insect that had happened to have acquired a negative
>> charge, it's hard to see what benefit could have accrued.
>> 
>> Sylvia.
> 
> Dear Sylvia. You are severely uneducated. What you just said is just so
> wrong. Human body has a Resistance, which accordingly its adherent
> Resistivity decrease with the contact surface/area, say for now, in the
> region of 500kOhm. (the palm of two feet is a quite large contact area).
> 
> More over the Static positive Potential of the body may rise up to MANY
> kilovolts!

(due to the electric insulation imposed by the wearing plastic shoes)

> 
>> [*] The net charge of any electrically conductive object is expressed
>> on its surface because of electric repulsion.
> 
> Not sure. Or I can't understand.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516532

The ’nym-shifting troll calling themselves "James Birdy" amok-crossposted:

> */Sylvia Else/* wrote:
>> [*] The net charge of any electrically conductive object is expressed on
>> its surface because of electric repulsion.
> 
> Not sure. Or I can't understand.

Given your evidentially low understanding of English and physics, which one 
do you think is more likely?  And if you were a logical being, should that 
determination not cause a considerable degree of humility in yourself, 
preventing you from issuing further statements such as “you are severely 
uneducated” and from further haunting these newsgroups with your obnoxious-
nonsensical behavior?


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516557

*/Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn/* wrote:

> The ’nym-shifting troll calling themselves "James Birdy"
> amok-crossposted:
> 
>> */Sylvia Else/* wrote:
>>> [*] The net charge of any electrically conductive object is expressed
>>> on its surface because of electric repulsion.
>> 
>> Not sure. Or I can't understand.
> 
> Given your evidentially low understanding of English and physics, which
> one do you think is more likely?

I do Models in Physics since you wore diaper. Can you code a model using 
what he said? I guess not, then stop trolling this group and shut the 
bleep up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web