Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515846 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James Birdy <dwuih2ht@djh3jg3ugh08.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-22 20:28 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 13:48 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 111 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <dwuih2ht@djh3jg3ugh08.org> - 2015-08-22 20:28 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:34 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:41 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:16 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:23 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:31 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 11:17 -0400
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:46 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 20:44 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:54 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:11 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:22 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:29 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:33 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:35 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:38 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:00 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:11 -0400
Re: Are there electrons that are different? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:54 -0400
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:41 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:17 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:25 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:40 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:51 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:03 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:07 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:10 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:24 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:59 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:12 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:14 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-26 10:51 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 20:35 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 15:54 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:45 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:08 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:18 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:46 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:10 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:53 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:45 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:43 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:13 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-26 02:20 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 20:55 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:02 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:08 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:11 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:13 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:43 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:43 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:54 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:47 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:35 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 15:51 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:15 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:20 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:56 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:08 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:30 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:15 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-23 06:44 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:55 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:18 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:27 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:40 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-23 17:06 +1000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:53 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:55 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 19:27 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:44 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:25 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 16:18 -0400
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:40 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:20 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0400
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:54 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 16:53 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:23 -0400
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:11 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:18 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:24 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:40 -0500
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:55 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:18 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:32 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:33 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:59 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:06 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:06 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 12:02 -0400
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:09 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:16 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:46 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:52 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:03 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:04 +0200
Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:21 +0000
Re: Are there electrons that are different? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:14 -0700
Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 13:48 -0400
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 23:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3ubCx.61744$rO6.32285@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #515866 |
On 08/22/2015 05:11 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 8/22/15 3:54 PM, James Birdy wrote:
>> Vaccines are obsolete
>> due to sanitation and many other things.
>
> Nope -- Vaccines reduce the spread of disease and helps to make
> whole populations healthier. Get your flu shot.
Sam, if you trust Big Gummint and Big Pharma to inject people with
something good for them, then you are a fool. Oh wait. I repeat the obvious.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 23:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jtdnac-j8r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515854 |
In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: > */jimp/* wrote: > >> However, before you do that, be sure to get a current tetanus shot, >> which is another thing only humans have, as the survival rate for severe >> tetanus is only about 35%. > > This is a stupid thing to read in a science group. Most of the humans > never get tetanus, nor are vaccinated against that. Vaccines are obsolete > due to sanitation and many other things. You look like a joke, or terribly > not updated. You really are a babbling idiot; tetanus is rare in the US and most first world countries because of vaccination. Everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot. The death rate for the rest of the world is about a quarter million per year. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 14:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrf9lm$6mj$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #515906 |
*/jimp/* wrote: > In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: >> */jimp/* wrote: >> >>> However, before you do that, be sure to get a current tetanus shot, >>> which is another thing only humans have, as the survival rate for >>> severe tetanus is only about 35%. >> >> This is a stupid thing to read in a science group. Most of the humans >> never get tetanus, nor are vaccinated against that. Vaccines are >> obsolete due to sanitation and many other things. You look like a joke, >> or terribly not updated. > > You really are a babbling idiot; tetanus is rare in the US and most > first world countries because of vaccination. Everyone who shows up to a > doctor with an injury that has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on > the spot. > > The death rate for the rest of the world is about a quarter million per > year. Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence to post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped in civilized countries.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 18:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1444630.KoRmWeq1dS@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #516434 |
James Birdy wrote:
> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence to
> post in a Science group. […]
ROTFL
PointedEars
--
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
testing your knowledge means everything.”
—Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 16:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i5trac-9ib.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516434 |
In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: > */jimp/* wrote: > >> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: >>> */jimp/* wrote: >>> >>>> However, before you do that, be sure to get a current tetanus shot, >>>> which is another thing only humans have, as the survival rate for >>>> severe tetanus is only about 35%. >>> >>> This is a stupid thing to read in a science group. Most of the humans >>> never get tetanus, nor are vaccinated against that. Vaccines are >>> obsolete due to sanitation and many other things. You look like a joke, >>> or terribly not updated. >> >> You really are a babbling idiot; tetanus is rare in the US and most >> first world countries because of vaccination. Everyone who shows up to a >> doctor with an injury that has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on >> the spot. >> >> The death rate for the rest of the world is about a quarter million per >> year. > > Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence to > post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that > supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you > need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped in > civilized countries. What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to understand, kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 16:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrfhej$rgq$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516496 |
*/jimp/* wrote: >> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence >> to post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that >> supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you >> need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped >> in civilized countries. > > What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has > any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to > understand, kook? No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, which looks stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 18:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4167304.oASMrh9vA7@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #516502 |
James Birdy wrote:
> */jimp/* wrote:
>> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has
>> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to
>> understand, kook?
>
> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, which
> looks stupid.
ROTFL
PointedEars
--
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
testing your knowledge means everything.”
—Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 17:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fcvrac-gqb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516502 |
In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: > */jimp/* wrote: > >>> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence >>> to post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that >>> supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you >>> need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped >>> in civilized countries. >> >> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has >> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to >> understand, kook? > > No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, which > looks stupid. That is just gibberish, kook. Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? If so, you are totally wrong, kook. Ask your mommy to take you to the doctor and explain it to you, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 18:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrfp1q$f63$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516521 |
*/jimp/* wrote: > In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: >> */jimp/* wrote: >> >>>> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the >>>> impertinence to post in a Science group. Even as getting an >>>> anti-tetanus shot, that supposedly is valid along a short period of >>>> time, say 3 years. Then you need another one, to stay updated. This >>>> type of vaccination is dropped in civilized countries. >>> >>> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has >>> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to >>> understand, kook? >> >> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, >> which looks stupid. > > That is just gibberish, kook. > Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you follow me?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 14:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrfq0n$idn$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516562 |
On 8/24/2015 1:50 PM, James Birdy wrote: Just so you know, it takes me two clicks to killfile every new identity you create. It certainly takes you more effort to create them. Keep it up, waste your time, it's easy to keep up with you. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 19:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrfq7m$ikr$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516568 |
*/Odd Bodkin/* wrote: > On 8/24/2015 1:50 PM, James Birdy wrote: > > Just so you know, it takes me two clicks to killfile every new identity > you create. It certainly takes you more effort to create them. Keep it > up, > waste your time, it's easy to keep up with you. Must be because you proved yourself nonsensical with your "Voltage difference". I don't really care man, if you don't want to read just not read. Only an unemployable will need a killfile and a program to help him not to read.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 19:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1l7sac-1kc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516562 |
In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: > */jimp/* wrote: > >> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: >>> */jimp/* wrote: >>> >>>>> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the >>>>> impertinence to post in a Science group. Even as getting an >>>>> anti-tetanus shot, that supposedly is valid along a short period of >>>>> time, say 3 years. Then you need another one, to stay updated. This >>>>> type of vaccination is dropped in civilized countries. >>>> >>>> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has >>>> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to >>>> understand, kook? >>> >>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, >>> which looks stupid. >> >> That is just gibberish, kook. >> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? > > So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you get > it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you follow me? If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook. You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook. You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 19:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrft24$r59$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516577 |
*/jimp/* wrote: >>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, >>>> which looks stupid. >>> >>> That is just gibberish, kook. >>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? >> >> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you >> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you >> follow me? > > If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook. > > You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the > last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook. > > You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler. It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no doubts about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban somewhere else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 13:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e5d7d42f-6572-407d-ad51-7f34289967c1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #516582 |
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 12:59:06 PM UTC-7, James Birdy wrote: > */jimp/* wrote: > > >>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, > >>>> which looks stupid. > >>> > >>> That is just gibberish, kook. > >>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? > >> > >> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you > >> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you > >> follow me? > > > > If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook. > > > > You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the > > last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook. > > > > You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler. > > It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those > unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. > > Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no doubts > about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban somewhere else. Electrons come in changes of weight and energy. Their charge moves at c and they can never get to c.At 99.9999999999999999 of c an electron weighs 70,000 times its rest mass.Thus it has 70,000 times greater force of gravity. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 09:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <61656b27-abd5-4c4d-8057-55babe4db0c5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #516588 |
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 1:12:52 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 12:59:06 PM UTC-7, James Birdy wrote: > > */jimp/* wrote: > > > > >>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, > > >>>> which looks stupid. > > >>> > > >>> That is just gibberish, kook. > > >>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? > > >> > > >> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you > > >> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you > > >> follow me? > > > > > > If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook. > > > > > > You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the > > > last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook. > > > > > > You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler. > > > > It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those > > unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. > > > > Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no doubts > > about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban somewhere else. > > Electrons come in changes of weight and energy. Their charge moves at c and they can never get to c.At 99.9999999999999999 of c an electron weighs 70,000 times its rest mass.Thus it has 70,000 times greater force of gravity. TreBert All electrons spin at c TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 10:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mrku82$s4p$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517020 |
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> :B::ert Glazier, the Swine, Hate filled War monger, Jewish Jailbird, Face-shitter and Graveyard Vandal, Thief, Racist, Bigot & Criminal Communist Traitor Sympathizer "reber g=emc^2" wrote: > "Electrons moves at c and they can never get to c" where "c" stands for the "cretin" that Swine Glazier is, which is clearly seen as son as <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> :B::ert Glazier, the Swine, Hate filled War monger, Jewish Jailbird, Face-shitter and Graveyard Vandal, Thief, Racist, Bigot & Criminal Communist Traitor Sympathizer "reber g=emc^2" introduces himself as/with > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew I'm the only Jew that :B:: got 2 letters from two Popes. Bert :B:: "I'm M&M's CLUELESS FUCK-FACED turd".Bert. :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" :B:: Israel will drop its first H-bomb "David". TreBert :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's :B:: face to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur,carbon & iron together :B:: to make gun powder" . >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 20:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lobsac-28d.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516582 |
In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: > */jimp/* wrote: > >>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, >>>>> which looks stupid. >>>> >>>> That is just gibberish, kook. >>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? >>> >>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you >>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you >>> follow me? >> >> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook. >> >> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the >> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook. >> >> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler. > > It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those > unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. > > Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no doubts > about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban somewhere else. Seek help from a mental health professional, you babbling kook. Learn how to compose a coherent sentence in English, you illiterate twit. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 15:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mri33a$rmu$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516599 |
jimp wrote: > In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: >> */jimp/* wrote: >> >>>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your >>>>>> face, >>>>>> which looks stupid. >>>>> >>>>> That is just gibberish, kook. >>>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? >>>> >>>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you >>>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you >>>> follow me? >>> >>> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook. >>> >>> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the >>> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook. >>> >>> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler. >> >> It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those >> unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. >> >> Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no >> doubts about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban >> somewhere else. > > Seek help from a mental health professional, you babbling kook. > Learn how to compose a coherent sentence in English, you illiterate > twit. Sick turd loosing the argument, trolling now by attacking his English. One more chance batshit. You either 1. Get your worthless vaccines every 8 years for no reason. Or 2. You get your toe bad infected/injured, then later get your anti-tetanus vaccine. Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp? Now watch the jimp vaporize.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 16:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lliuac-7ig.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516776 |
In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote: >>> */jimp/* wrote: >>> >>>>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your >>>>>>> face, >>>>>>> which looks stupid. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is just gibberish, kook. >>>>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook? >>>>> >>>>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you >>>>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you >>>>> follow me? >>>> >>>> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook. >>>> >>>> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the >>>> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook. >>>> >>>> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler. >>> >>> It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those >>> unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. >>> >>> Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no >>> doubts about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban >>> somewhere else. >> >> Seek help from a mental health professional, you babbling kook. >> Learn how to compose a coherent sentence in English, you illiterate >> twit. > > Sick turd loosing the argument, trolling now by attacking his English. One > more chance batshit. You either > > 1. Get your worthless vaccines every 8 years for no reason. 10 years and the reason is to avoid getting tetanus, kook. > Or > > 2. You get your toe bad infected/injured, then later get your anti-tetanus > vaccine. And hope you got the vaccination in time to save your life from an incurable disease. > Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp? Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter million a year, kook. > Now watch the jimp vaporize. Are you referring to the vapor between your ears, kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 19:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrieen$r23$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #516800 |
jimp wrote: >> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp? > > Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in > the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter > million a year, kook. I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many things, let alone Science. Vaccines did NOT eliminate anything, since this is not their task, jimp. Something aimed to eliminate would the own Immune Syste. You are batshit crazy, see a doctor, now! All the germs in the world are already in your body, learn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web