Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #500502 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-16 22:13 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-06-16 22:13 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Why Are There More Protons Than Antiprotons? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-16 22:13 +0200
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-16 22:13 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Why Are There More Protons Than Antiprotons? |
| Message-ID | <3870623.7zoqCCfeTN@PointedEars.de> |
Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 5/21/2015 7:34 PM, john wrote:
>> You're the one into books.
>> Are you saying that the solar wind
>> has no appreciable effect over billions of
>> years on the planets? Have you
>> calculated it with your superior
>> knowledge?
>
> Yes, it's been calculated. I can do it right now for you, using numbers
> you can look up on the internet*.
> […]
The erroneous calculation notwithstanding, the expected footnote for the
assumed footnote mark “*” is missing from your posting.
PointedEars
--
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
testing your knowledge means everything.”
—Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web