Re: Why Are There More Protons Than Antiprotons?

From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Why Are There More Protons Than Antiprotons?
Date	2015-06-16 22:13 +0200
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID	<3870623.7zoqCCfeTN@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	(17 earlier) <FLSdncmGT4uN0MPInZ2dnUU7-dMAAAAA@giganews.com> <5fb7cda7-7731-4f57-994c-673a1b13d8ee@googlegroups.com> <mjlknn$a57$1@speranza.aioe.org> <e8aa503b-1d70-432a-8b31-02d61bd0a012@googlegroups.com> <mjn759$3qi$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 5/21/2015 7:34 PM, john wrote:
>> You're the one into books.
>> Are you saying that the solar wind
>> has no appreciable effect over billions of
>> years on the planets? Have you
>> calculated it with your superior
>> knowledge?
> 
> Yes, it's been calculated. I can do it right now for you, using numbers
> you can look up on the internet*.
> […]

The erroneous calculation notwithstanding, the expected footnote for the 
assumed footnote mark “*” is missing from your posting.


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why Are There More Protons Than Antiprotons? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-16 22:13 +0200

csiph-web