Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #584619 > unrolled thread

Why We're All Trapped In 3-D

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 18:54 -0500
    Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 16:59 -0700
      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-12 20:37 -0500
    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-12 20:36 -0500
    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D emptypost@hotmail.com - 2016-06-12 20:53 -0700
    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-13 14:16 +0200
      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-13 09:07 -0700
        Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 10:15 -0700
          Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-13 12:50 -0500
            Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 11:13 -0700
              Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-13 21:47 -0400
      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-13 12:20 -0700
        Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 21:45 -0700
          Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-15 07:05 -0400
      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 14:13 -0700
      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-13 20:44 -0400
        Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 17:59 -0700
          Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-13 21:31 -0400
            Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 18:45 -0700
            Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 13:29 +0200
              Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 05:07 -0700
                Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-14 09:37 -0400
                Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 15:43 +0200
                  Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 07:14 -0700
                    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 16:31 +0200
                      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 08:23 -0700
                        Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 17:31 +0200
                          Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 08:39 -0700
                            Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 18:44 +0200
                              Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 10:41 -0700
                                Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 11:19 -0700
                                Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 21:59 +0200
                  Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 07:16 -0700
                    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 07:20 -0700
              Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 13:05 -0700
        Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 13:22 +0200
          Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-14 18:58 -0500
      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-14 08:06 -0400
        Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-14 08:56 -0400
          Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 16:07 +0200
            Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-14 14:58 -0400
              Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-14 21:49 +0200
            Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-15 07:42 -0400
              Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-15 15:06 +0200
                Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-15 09:38 -0400
                  Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 06:43 -0700
                  Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-15 17:20 +0200
                    dimensional glasses (polarized e.g noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:11 -0700
                    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-15 23:00 -0400
                      Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 12:08 -0700
          Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-14 14:43 -0400
    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 12:51 -0700
    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 12:52 -0700
    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D xxein1@att.net - 2016-06-14 16:54 -0700
    Re: Why We're All Trapped In 3-D Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-16 16:06 -0400

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#584847

Lahn said:
"The proper spelling is _insightful_, … "

Show us how to do it, Lahn, 
don't tell us.
Post your OWN stuff and do it BETTER.
You can't 
  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584857

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:07:15 -0700 (PDT), john wrote:

>Lahn said:
>"The proper spelling is _insightful_, … "
>
>Show us how to do it, Lahn, 
>don't tell us.
>Post your OWN stuff and do it BETTER.
>You can't 

What do you mean by "It"?

Spoon-feeding you because you don't want to look elsewhere for
information?  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584858

john wrote:

> Lahn said:
> "The proper spelling is _insightful_, … "
> 
> Show us how to do it, Lahn,
> don't tell us.
> Post your OWN stuff and do it BETTER.
> You can't

Which part of “BTDT” did you not understand?

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584866

Lahn
>Which part of “BTDT” did you not understand? 

I did not understand ALL 
of it.
What does it mean?
Is it constructive or is it
a supercilious nitpicker?

Post some ideas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584869

john wrote:

> Lahn

That is _not_ a proper attribution line.  Learn to quote.

>> Which part of “BTDT” did you not understand?
> 
> I did not understand ALL of it.

A pity, because Google is your friend there, “john”.

[I will forever be amazed that people like you can post using Google Groups, 
and at the same time not get the idea of using the other Google services 
before asking about things that they do not understand.  You do not even 
have to type the question into the Web Search input field anymore; just say 
“OK Google, what does BTDT mean?” to get the answer *read aloud* to you.  
(BTDT.)]

> What does it mean?

“Been There, Done That.”  It means that what you said that I should do, 
I have already done.  (You just did not realize it yet.)

It is a common acronym, one of many.  You would be well-advised to learn the 
most used ones (or simply research them when when necessary) before posting 
to Usenet again.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584872

What, Lahn,
you didn't read the post 2 above?

If you are finished thinking,
wondering, and communicating
and only want to nitpick,
BTDT is right.

But I don't yet think that
EVERYTHING is nailed down,
so I am still here doing that.
Please read for content, not style, okay?
Attribution? You can't understand context?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584873

john wrote:

> What, Lahn,
> you didn't read the post 2 above?
> […]

Si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584874

Lahn
Okay, gotcha- you're keeping quiet
lest we find out that you're foolish.

Don't worry- Mahipal said it- we all make
mistakes. I would LOVE to hear
your ideas. Please don't be shy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584880

john wrote:

> I would LOVE to hear your ideas.

Only to deride them, or to ignore them and posting nonsense of the “not even 
wrong” kind instead.  The record shows:

<news:26d79a37-a031-41de-8953-732f49b9846b@googlegroups.com>
<news:b957b49b-0e2e-46f6-94cf-50e5e843d04f@googlegroups.com>
<news:dc639a1d-11e2-4aad-9181-7b6f888422ba@googlegroups.com>
<news:b8c30164-bb22-4a0f-85f5-c9aeeba41b22@googlegroups.com>
<news:181eeb2a-0dbd-4ad4-85c0-f439ada3d732@googlegroups.com>

> Please don't be shy.

The issue here is instead that all indications are that you are a science 
crank, “john”.  Therefore, presenting my ideas to you would be a waste of my 
precious time.  Give me reason to think otherwise by your not posting like a 
complete idiot anymore, and I might reconsider.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584886

Thomas
You got nothing
Just be quiet, now

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584891

Or better still, just plonk me.
Then I don't have to hear you whining

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584915

john wrote:

> Thomas
> You got nothing
> Just be quiet, now

*PLONK*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584867

On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 9:43:26 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> john wrote:
> 
> > Lahn said:
> > "The proper spelling is _insightful_, … "

Real humans make realtime spelling errors all the time. It's just fine.
 
> > Show us how to do it, Lahn,
> > don't tell us.
> > Post your OWN stuff and do it BETTER.
> > You can't
> 
> Which part of “BTDT” did you not understand?

Stop being rude and hell bent on following Usenet Protocols, PointedEars.

What my pal Sir JohnJi means is... if I may paraphrase him...
Friend PointedEars, please do continue to do so. Be insightful. No BTDT.
 
> -- 
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584868

Kahn
Okay, looked up been there done that.

So- you're finished thinking and wondering
and there's nothing new under the sun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584917

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
Wally W.  wrote: 

> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:59:44 -0700 (PDT), john wrote: 
>> Wally, why don't you and Lahn post BETTER, more INTERESTING 
>> stuff, AND make inciteful comments for all of us? 

BTDT (and how well you know). 

> Sam copies and pastes. 
> 
> Where are his inciteful comments? 

The proper spelling is _insightful_, … 
------------

I'm sure Wally spelled it exactly as he wished to

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584843

Wally W.  wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:16:54 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Further, it is then being considered to report you for spamming with your
>> service provider(s), which may result in the suspension or cancellation 
>> of your account(s) there due to violation of the providers’ Acceptable 
>> Use Policies.
> 
> Here's how:
> https://support.google.com/mail/contact/gtag_headers?group=hijack_spam

No.  That is the _GMail_ support form.  Google _Groups_ has its own spam 
reporting (dys)functionality, but Sam is not posting to Usenet via either 
GMail or Google Groups, but GigaNews.  The terms of service can be found at 
<http://www.giganews.com/legal/tos_personal.html>

I still hope that Sam takes the warning shot for what it is, reconsiders, 
and that my submitting a formal complaint will not be necessary.  To be 
clear about this, I do not object to science news as a whole; I object to 
*pure*, *mindless* *mass* *copypasting* of science news where you can no 
longer see the real discussions for the "news", and I object to posting
off-topic and pseudo news (such as the one about geothermal energy – the 
relevance of that to *physics* is *zero*).

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584940

On 6/14/2016 6:22 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Wally W.  wrote:
>

> I still hope that Sam takes the warning shot for what it is, reconsiders,
> and that my submitting a formal complaint will not be necessary.  To be
> clear about this, I do not object to science news as a whole; I object to
> *pure*, *mindless* *mass* *copypasting* of science news where you can no
> longer see the real discussions for the "news", and I object to posting
> off-topic and pseudo news (such as the one about geothermal energy – the
> relevance of that to *physics* is *zero*).

besides compaining, do you have anything of positive value for this 
newsgroup ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584846

On 13/06/2016 8:16 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> You have been warned.

Hey idiot, STFU. Sam only spams this newsgroup with his global warming 
crap, but this stuff is actually physics related. Nobody appointed you 
moderator, so go moderate yourself and disappear!

	Yousuf Khan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584852

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:06:41 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:

>On 13/06/2016 8:16 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> You have been warned.
>
>Hey idiot, STFU. Sam only spams this newsgroup with his global warming 
>crap, but this stuff is actually physics related. Nobody appointed you 
>moderator, so go moderate yourself and disappear!
>
>	Yousuf Khan

Where was Sam's "discussion" in his post?

Why did *this* shiny thing catch his attention today?

What did he say about why he thought anyone else should be interested?

Where did he explains "Why We're All Trapped In 3-D"?

Do we not experience the 4th dimension neglected because it is only
one way?

Sam trolls with crap like this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
Two studies published in 2013 and 2014 have found that people who are
identified as trolls tend to have dark personality traits and show
signs of sadism, antisocial behavior, psychopathy, and
machiavellianism.

Can you say, "Stockholm Syndrome?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
Stockholm syndrome, or capture-bonding, is a psychological phenomenon
described in 1973 in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and
have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of
defending and identifying with the captors.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584863

Wally W.  wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:06:41 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:
>> […] Sam only spams this newsgroup with his global warming

Obviously incorrect.

>> […], but this stuff is actually physics related.

If you cared to notice, my objection was not to the OP in particular.

>> Nobody appointed you moderator, so go moderate yourself and disappear!

First of all, obviously you have no idea how moderation works on Usenet.
A newsgroup moderator *never* posts their comments to the newsgroup; they do 
not approve and do not forward e-mails they get to the newsgroup instead.

Second, if I find a newsgroup unusable because one individual floods it with 
irrelevant postings, it is my right to point out that this behavior is very 
likely of disadvantage to all other users, and to warn that if this 
continues, those postings will be filtered out by default with the devices 
*I* use to access the newsgroup.  It is also my right to send complaints to 
providers for network abuse by others, and to warn them about that.  
(Whether those take effect depends on the provider.)

> […]
> Where was Sam's "discussion" in his post?

Missing.
 
> Why did *this* shiny thing catch his attention today?

Possibility: It was published shortly ago, on 2016-06-07.

> What did he say about why he thought anyone else should be interested?

He did not, but it is physics-related indeed.
 
> Where did he explains "Why We're All Trapped In 3-D"?

He did not; the quoted text does.  Does that justify posting it?  I am not 
sure, but probably not; it is not even news.  What it certainly does not 
justify is being part of a flood of "news" postings, all originating from 
Sam.

> Do we not experience the 4th dimension neglected because it is only
> one way?

If you mean “Do we not experience the 4th dimension because …?”, then the 
answer is “Mu”.  And if you mean time by “the 4th dimension”, then we do 
experience “the 4th dimension”.  But that is not what the article is about.

> Can you say, "Stockholm Syndrome?"

Unrelated, unless one suffers from an obsessive-compulsive behavior to use 
this newsgroup, thereby considering themselves a hostage.  Judging from 
other postings, though, there are examples of people here for whom this may 
not be far from the truth.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web