Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #573462

Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings
Date 2016-04-26 17:37 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ujl4vc-ocj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <nfmnlc$rb6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5a190374-56d8-4d46-8631-a2a473b24ce0@googlegroups.com> <g9d3vc-i5f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <3a3042f4-6000-4751-b509-88bb98149a4b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 6:05:06 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Monday, April 25, 2016 at 8:35:14 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> >> (no need to read this, this list is a set of common thoughts James 
>> >> McGinn uses in posting, which underscores the very shallow depth of 
>> >> knowledge, and inability to converse, classic retard)
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> short list of crank/troll McFly thread ending replies
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 1. I don't know what you are talking about, honestly.
>> >> 
>> >> 2. It must be frustrating to be sure you are right and so completely 
>> >> unable to say how or why.
>> >> 
>> >> 3. You pinhead think if you find it in wikipedia it must be true. Duhr.
>> >> 
>> >> 4. I suggest you do some research.
>> >> 
>> >> 5. It's hard to believe you are this dumb.
>> >> 
>> >> 6. Pay attention.
>> >> 
>> >> 7. Science is about reality, not imagination.
>> >> 
>> >> 8. What you describe here has more to do with stamp collecting than it 
>> >> does science.
>> >> 
>> >> 9. It's great how the anonymity of the internet allows fools the freedom
>> >> to express the depths of their foolishness.
>> >> 
>> >> 10. Present your proof, dumbass.
>> >> 
>> >> 11. Where is this extensive experimental data?
>> >> 
>> >> 12.  Why do you think it is that nobody can find it?
>> >> 
>> >> 13.  Do you think they are hiding it from us?  Why would they do that?
>> > 
>> > He excels at answering questions with questions...
>> 
>> Answering a question with a question is a valid technique if the answer
>> to the second question gives greater insight into the first question.
>> 
>> However when that question is just babbling nonsense, like most everything
>> this idiot writes...
>> 
> 
> What if you are not smart enough to comprehend the insight?

Since you are incapable of understanding even the most simple things,
there is no chance of that happening with your delusional spew.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-25 22:35 -0500
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 20:39 -0700
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-25 21:16 -0700
    Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 06:09 +0000
      Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 06:30 -0700
        Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 17:37 +0000
          Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 11:10 -0700
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-26 06:21 +0200
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-28 11:57 -0500

csiph-web