Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #573980

Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/25/2016 10:35 PM, Sergio wrote:
> (no need to read this, this list is a set of common thoughts James
> McGinn uses in posting, which underscores the very shallow depth of
> knowledge, and inability to converse, classic retard)


James Mcginn is making a living selling Dehydrated Water Vapor.

>
> short list of crank/troll McFly thread ending replies
>
>
> 1. I don't know what you are talking about, honestly.
>
> 2. It must be frustrating to be sure you are right and so completely
>  unable to say how or why.
>
> 3. You pinhead think if you find it in wikipedia it must be true.
> Duhr.
>
> 4. I suggest you do some research.
>
> 5. It's hard to believe you are this dumb.
>
> 6. Pay attention.
>
> 7. Science is about reality, not imagination.
>
> 8. What you describe here has more to do with stamp collecting than
> it does science.
>
> 9. It's great how the anonymity of the internet allows fools the
> freedom to express the depths of their foolishness.
>
> 10. Present your proof, dumbass.
>
> 11. Where is this extensive experimental data?
>
> 12.  Why do you think it is that nobody can find it?
>
> 13.  Do you think they are hiding it from us?  Why would they do
> that?


additions

14. Did I characterize  your argument accurately?

15. Hmm.  Seems like a did.  Uh.  er.  Uh.

16. Science is not what you believe, but what can be verified.

17. nobody can find evidence of an experiment and nobody can find the
"extensive" data.

18. What conclusion would a reasonable person draw from this?

19. Let me put it this way, Clear Air Turbulence is called  Clear Air
Turbulence because it has energetic wind shear and, uh, because it is clear.

20. Every once in a while you should pull your head out.

21. My theory resolves the issue.

22. By the way, I've been contacted by Google.  They wanted to inform me
that my post (link above) is the most viewed post in the history of Usenet.

23. I am a physicist.

24. You seem really confused with these questions.  Why not address my
thinking directly so I don't have to re-explain technical concepts.


25.  I'm saying my explanation is complex.

26. Why would it be necessary to contradict what exists only in your 
imagination?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-25 22:35 -0500
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 20:39 -0700
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-25 21:16 -0700
    Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 06:09 +0000
      Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 06:30 -0700
        Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 17:37 +0000
          Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 11:10 -0700
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-26 06:21 +0200
  Re: James McGinn hates Science and here are a few his closings Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-28 11:57 -0500

csiph-web