Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #519823
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore |
| Date | 2015-09-08 20:59 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <squ3cc-t2m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <georgeswk-D2611A.07362525032011@news.toast.net> <QqOdnYj_Qd9ycXPInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1bl3cc-p1l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <msngdd$hlt$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> "Karen Silkwood" <georgeswk@toast.net> wrote in message >>> news:georgeswk-D2611A.07362525032011@news.toast.net... >>>> a national air defense system that can be defeated by some guy in a >>>> cave. >> >> On 9/11 the national air defense system no mission for the interior >> airpace of the continental US; it was all looking outward. > > > > > > WRONG. > The planes that could have been in NYC, were deliberaly sent out to sea. Correct. Prior to 9/11 the entire continental air defense system was looking outward for exterior threats as no one had imagined an airstrike on the continental US originating from within the US. Given the thinking and mission at that time, sending aircraft out to sea to seek an exterior threat would make complete sense. <snip remaing babble> -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 9/11 and the gullible "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 09:15 -0500
Re: Red herrings galore jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:17 +0000
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 and the gullible "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-13 14:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-13 14:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 20:59 +0000
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:46 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:37 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-11 11:00 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-11 15:23 +0000
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-11 12:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 14:06 -0400
Re: 9/11 Red herrings galore "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 and the gullible "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:48 -0500
csiph-web