Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #550019

Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference
Date Tue, 2 Feb 2016 20:54:20 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 21
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <skh7oc-9d8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <Eq6dnQ03LMUu4DLLnZ2dnUU7-L2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <a3h0bbpqnimtbb1ueutindnh2r1810kaan@4ax.com> <olt5oc-as2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <U9GdnTVyfdwoVy3LnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> <t3b7oc-0n7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <vuWdnVkEios9nyzLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <d1d7oc-bv7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <K5SdnefyYqwlkizLnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="29786"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5Lil8cxx5d6GyiOtOYpvj"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:RhBUpl25rfFQ9XNgHv4c5++uodE=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:550019

Show key headers only | View raw

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/2/16 1:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head.
>>
>> If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control,
>   your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total

Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head.

If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head.

<snip yet another repaste of the cut and paste>


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 09:45 -0600
  Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-02 00:54 -0500
    Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 06:07 +0000
      Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 09:26 -0600
        Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:02 +0000
          Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 13:25 -0600
            Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:35 +0000
              Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 14:21 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 20:54 +0000
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:04 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 23:16 +0000
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:59 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 01:05 +0000
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 19:17 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 02:49 +0000
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:17 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:19 +0000
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:35 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:54 +0000
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:04 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:34 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:49 -0600
                Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-02 17:25 -0800
  Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-03 16:18 -0800
    Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:32 -0600
      Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-04 17:26 -0800
        Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 19:35 -0600
          Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 20:02 -0600

csiph-web