Re: A basis for all cryptography

From	Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: A basis for all cryptography
Date	2015-10-30 04:43 +0000
Organization	NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID	<pan.2015.10.30.04.43.09@localhost.localdomain> (permalink)
References	<DIqdnRG0rK2fJa_LnZ2dnUU7-W8AAAAA@giganews.com> <n0ujeb$sq2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.10.30.02.31.03@localhost.localdomain> <f814754b-2d7d-41cb-b560-20675cac9dfc@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:10:47 -0700, xxein1 wrote:

>
> Go ahead.  Introduce a physics subject that YOU are qualified to talk about.
>

I just did, you disgusting ignoramus asshole.

It's called the Monte Carlo methodology and it shifts a thoroughly
inappropriate topic into one that is highly suitable for physics.

I think, you idiotic turd-brain, that you may have completely missed
the point.

Thread

A basis for all cryptography Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 19:21 -0500
  Re: A basis for all cryptography benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 21:39 -0400
    Re: A basis for all cryptography xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-29 21:03 -0700
  Re: A basis for all cryptography gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 21:07 -0500
    Re: A basis for all cryptography Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 02:31 +0000
      Re: A basis for all cryptography xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-29 21:10 -0700
        Re: A basis for all cryptography Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 04:43 +0000
          Re: A basis for all cryptography xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-30 00:07 -0700
  Re: A basis for all cryptography jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:21 +0000
    Re: A basis for all cryptography Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:09 -0500
      Re: A basis for all cryptography jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 17:05 +0000

csiph-web