Re: A basis for all cryptography

From	Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: A basis for all cryptography
Date	2015-10-30 02:31 +0000
Organization	NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID	<pan.2015.10.30.02.31.03@localhost.localdomain> (permalink)
References	<DIqdnRG0rK2fJa_LnZ2dnUU7-W8AAAAA@giganews.com> <n0ujeb$sq2$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:07:57 -0500, gilber34 wrote:

> 
> <snip FatAssInACubeMakingStuffUp@phys.org>
> 
> fatass did not read the paper, its totally different;
> (there is no summery! so it may not have been fully reviewed yet)
> 

This stuff has no application in physics.  None.  Nada.  Zip.

Physicists use randomness for things like Monte Carlo simulations.
In such cases any source of randomness is sufficient.

This posting does not belong here and the fault is entirely with
the original poster.

Thread

A basis for all cryptography Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 19:21 -0500
  Re: A basis for all cryptography benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 21:39 -0400
    Re: A basis for all cryptography xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-29 21:03 -0700
  Re: A basis for all cryptography gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 21:07 -0500
    Re: A basis for all cryptography Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 02:31 +0000
      Re: A basis for all cryptography xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-29 21:10 -0700
        Re: A basis for all cryptography Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 04:43 +0000
          Re: A basis for all cryptography xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-30 00:07 -0700
  Re: A basis for all cryptography jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:21 +0000
    Re: A basis for all cryptography Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:09 -0500
      Re: A basis for all cryptography jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 17:05 +0000

csiph-web