Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #641751

Re: Most irrational speculations of physics

From Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Most irrational speculations of physics
Date 2017-07-22 00:28 +0000
Organization Kurt Larrabee Institute
Message-ID <oku689$oos$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <97010fe8-e629-4848-8cbc-13dba0c2803f@googlegroups.com> <oktj46$1a9j$2@gioia.aioe.org> <11922e6e-1017-4c2e-ba26-d06466d6e31f@googlegroups.com> <oktp9u$1scm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oku1n7$jmb$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Serg io wrote:

>>> Do you see the equals sing in  x(t) = t² ? Yes? hence its an equation
>>> by definition.
>> 
>> Listen up, stoopid, when a variable takes an input it depends on, then
>> output a value, that's a FUNCTION,
> 
> wrong, it is still an equation as it has the = sign.

Isn't x a function of t, hence a FUNCTION dependent of its input?? Can't 
you read, moron. I am surrounded by morons.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Esteban Viars <esane@snbvten.vt> - 2017-07-21 20:47 +0000
  Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 18:11 -0500
    Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 00:28 +0000
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 20:21 -0500
        Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:19 +0000
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:18 -0700
  Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 12:18 +0000
    Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 08:48 -0500
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 15:20 +0000
    Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Kurt Larrabee <arb@twraa.ab> - 2017-07-22 17:14 +0000
      Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 13:15 -0500
        Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-22 18:21 -0400
          Re: Most irrational speculations of physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-30 20:25 -0500
            Re: Most irrational speculations of physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-31 17:19 -0400
  Re: Most irrational speculations of physics James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 09:02 -0700
  Re: Most irrational speculations of physics James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 18:56 -0700

csiph-web