Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff

From	Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff
Date	2017-02-14 08:22 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<o7v3rp$vrv$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<o7r866$9mo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o7taml$5lg$1@pcls7.std.com> <f5620595-f5bd-476d-acde-19ec3d410785@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/14/2017 7:23 AM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Monday, February 13, 2017 at 5:07:19 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> writes:
>
> Holding a consistent userID handle could serve to improve content quality.

totally agree,
	the "Denk vs. McGinn" discussions
	keep out sellers of wasteland, not even useful for neclear dumps.

>
>>> Is sci.physics now 100 % clutter ?
>>
>>>        any real physics at all being posted ?
>
> Physics is complicated, not a rehashTag@# of contents in its textbooks.

there is a lot of knowledge in sci.physics, I learned from sci.physics 
that one can buy/use high viscosity silicone differential fluid for 
model RC racing on Photomulitplier tubes to scintillator connections.

Books do not have the practical working side of physics, where this 
group can really contribute.

>
>> Thanks for trying to inject some actual science here, but to answer your
>> question, yes, sci.physics is now just a looney bin.
>
> If by now is meant since 1990s, then the looney has just grown, as of late.
> Used to be a time, a large number of posters here had *.edu domain named
> email addresses. I've not seen one here, since I returned to Usenet,
> like six years ago. Must have something to do with new universities' policies.

Microsoft/google has slowly and sucessfully strangled off access to the 
usenet via its browsers, so a person that just bought a computer has no 
idea the usenet exists.  There are some sites that re-broadcast the 
forums, like drexial and others.  So most of the users are older ones 
that know how, or still can connect to usenet, and the younger ones 
prefer to go to the sites with pictures, videos, active content, not 
text, etc.

>
> Many here, there, or anywhere... are not just going to simply worship OneStone.

supporting ideas or beliefs is needed to re-inforce self esteem, even 
oddball ones.

somehow sci.physics posters have arrived here, prescreened by past 
knowledge (older age), and perhaps by no forum in which they would get 
a responce.

>
> -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”
>

Thread

Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-12 21:12 -0600
  Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:31 -0800
  Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-13 09:46 -0800
    Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 07:32 -0800
    Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 10:19 -0800
  Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-13 22:07 +0000
    Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-13 18:45 -0800
      Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-14 12:49 +0000
      Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 07:38 -0800
    Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 06:27 +0100
      Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 02:31 -0800
        Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-14 07:57 -0600
          Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 07:28 -0800
    Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 05:23 -0800
      Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-14 08:22 -0600
        Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 07:18 -0800
          Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-14 09:49 -0600
            Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 08:04 -0800
        Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 07:29 -0800
        Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 07:41 -0800
          Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 11:48 -0800
            Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 09:03 -0800
      Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-14 18:52 -0500
        Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 21:14 -0800
    Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 07:36 -0800
      Re: Is sci.physics now 100 % scrap ? and AM transmitter antenna stuff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 13:26 -0800
    Michael Moroney can't/won't read me properly. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-02-14 18:18 -0800
      The inmates always hate their description moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-15 04:28 +0000

csiph-web