Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards.

From	Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, alt.fan.cyberchicken, alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject	Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards.
Followup-To	alt.usenet.kooks
Date	2017-02-11 20:54 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<o7ntm4$9uc$17@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <A2916600.F1EF435E@Metula.Tannerae.Orientalis> <o7mno2$t05$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5822453E.2EF64310@Narcissus.Asteriola.Circumvagum> <o7mtg1$172b$2@gioia.aioe.org> <A667614E.B5A44635@Tylodon.Spicant.Thermosyntrophicum>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.usenet.kooks

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:11:38 +1100, KOOKYitchy Man wrote:

> kensi, thou tassel of a prodigal's purse. Ye balloon-headed disguised
> cheater, ye exclaimed:
> 
>> On 2/11/2017 6:26 AM, Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, you still have this problem, fuckhead:
>>>
>>> σxσp ≥ ħ/2
>>>
>>> You have no idea what it is, do you!
>>
>> Thube Hubeu

Dishonest quote-editing? How lame. Restoring what kensi *actually* said:

>> The Heisenberg uncertainty principle, in the specific case of the
>> momentum/position couplet? Of course I do. The very question is insulting.
>> 
>> It's also not relevant to your k'lame of time-irreversibility of quantum
>> physics, which you backpedaled on sneakily by burying an admission that
>> quantum physics is CPT-symmetric in the midst of your mass of ko0KscRe3d.
>> 
>> Nonetheless, you did imply the k'lame you later walked back, when you
>> reacted to the concept of a "thermodynamic arrow of time" by calling it
>> quasi-classical, implying you thought there was a non-thermodynamic,
>> quantum-level arrow of time -- likely arising from some variation on the
>> tired, hackneyed old theme of "wavefunction collapse". Of course, in the
>> absence of magical collapse fairies making all the other Everett
>> branches go away, there is a quantum arrow of time, but it's
>> thermodynamic: branch decoherence is thermodynamically irreversible, as
>> once the number of particles in different states/positions gets past a
>> handful getting the two branches to exchange any significant amplitude
>> ever again is like unscrambling an egg. (To the point that the math for
>> that is very similar to that for unscrambling an egg.)
> 
> You blithering idiot

After restoring what kensi *actually* wrote, I don't see anything that
remotely resembles either "blithering" or "idiocy" -- just you getting
your ass handed to you in spectacular fashion as kensi proves you sadly
mistaken in your belief that she wouldn't recognize that inequality you
posted, *and* sees past that deflection and continues to press her
original point re: time's arrow.

That you have to resort to dishonest tactics such as quote editing
proves you have an empty quiver, and proves that you *know* it's empty.
As kensi put it, "if your arguments require you to use such tactics to
escape rebuttal, then you deserve to lose."

Well, guess what, kooky? You just lost. Big time.

Ironic that your insult-generator accused *kensi* of being a "cheater", by the way.

Now quit trying to wriggle out of your SPNAK! and take it like an adult.

-- 
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

Thread

Quasar redshift vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-02-06 14:45 +0000
  Re: Quasar redshift kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-06 10:35 -0500
    Re: Quasar redshift john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 07:50 -0800
    Re: Quasar redshift vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-02-06 16:28 +0000
      Re: Quasars are dying out because gravity itself is evaporating away. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-06 18:23 +0000
        Re: Entropy increases, eternally, without beginning or end. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-06 21:47 +0000
          Re: Entropy increases, eternally, without beginning or end. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 13:59 -0800
        Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:31 -0500
          Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-08 13:04 -0500
            Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 12:34 -0800
              Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-08 16:22 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 17:08 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 22:00 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-09 17:33 -0500
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 15:07 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-09 18:30 -0500
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-09 15:31 -0800
                whence clocks whould tickenn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 19:58 -0800
                Re: whence clocks whould tickenn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 00:35 -0800
            Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 17:14 -0800
              Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-09 21:05 -0500
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 08:54 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-11 17:54 -0500
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 00:58 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 03:25 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-13 16:04 -0500
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 03:26 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-13 16:05 -0500
            Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:11 +1100
              Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-10 23:35 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:55 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 00:11 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 19:46 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 00:50 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:07 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 01:12 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:15 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 01:19 -0800
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:26 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 01:32 -0800
              Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 05:06 -0500
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 22:26 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 06:44 -0500
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 00:11 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 20:54 +0000
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 09:45 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 23:17 +0000
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:43 +1100
                Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-12 05:09 -0500
  Quasar redshift HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 08:56 -0800
    Quasar redshift john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 09:12 -0800
    Re: Quasar redshift benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:53 -0500
      Re: Quasar redshift noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 15:47 -0800
    Re: Quasar redshift Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-07 18:47 -0600
      The dopplerianS noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 19:20 -0800

csiph-web