Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #618068
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, alt.fan.cyberchicken, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. |
| Date | 2017-02-11 06:44 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <o7mtg1$172b$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <589a3cb4$0$57736$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <o7fmj5$1nvc$3@gioia.aioe.org> <A2916600.F1EF435E@Metula.Tannerae.Orientalis> <o7mno2$t05$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5822453E.2EF64310@Narcissus.Asteriola.Circumvagum> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2/11/2017 6:26 AM, Kadaitcha Man wrote: > BTW, you still have this problem, fuckhead: > > σxσp ≥ ħ/2 > > You have no idea what it is, do you! The Heisenberg uncertainty principle, in the specific case of the momentum/position couplet? Of course I do. The very question is insulting. It's also not relevant to your k'lame of time-irreversibility of quantum physics, which you backpedaled on sneakily by burying an admission that quantum physics is CPT-symmetric in the midst of your mass of ko0KscRe3d. Nonetheless, you did imply the k'lame you later walked back, when you reacted to the concept of a "thermodynamic arrow of time" by calling it quasi-classical, implying you thought there was a non-thermodynamic, quantum-level arrow of time -- likely arising from some variation on the tired, hackneyed old theme of "wavefunction collapse". Of course, in the absence of magical collapse fairies making all the other Everett branches go away, there is a quantum arrow of time, but it's thermodynamic: branch decoherence is thermodynamically irreversible, as once the number of particles in different states/positions gets past a handful getting the two branches to exchange any significant amplitude ever again is like unscrambling an egg. (To the point that the math for that is very similar to that for unscrambling an egg.) P.S. Quit trying to block replies to this article by sneakily adding extra froups and then hiding them "below the fold" in my client's UI. If your arguments require you to use such tactics to escape rebuttal, then you deserve to lose. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Quasar redshift vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-02-06 14:45 +0000
Re: Quasar redshift kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-06 10:35 -0500
Re: Quasar redshift john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 07:50 -0800
Re: Quasar redshift vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-02-06 16:28 +0000
Re: Quasars are dying out because gravity itself is evaporating away. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-06 18:23 +0000
Re: Entropy increases, eternally, without beginning or end. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-02-06 21:47 +0000
Re: Entropy increases, eternally, without beginning or end. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 13:59 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:31 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-08 13:04 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 12:34 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-08 16:22 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 17:08 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 22:00 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-09 17:33 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 15:07 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-09 18:30 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-09 15:31 -0800
whence clocks whould tickenn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 19:58 -0800
Re: whence clocks whould tickenn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 00:35 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 17:14 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-09 21:05 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 08:54 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-11 17:54 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 00:58 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 03:25 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-13 16:04 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 03:26 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-13 16:05 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:11 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-10 23:35 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:55 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 00:11 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 19:46 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 00:50 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:07 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 01:12 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:15 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 01:19 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:26 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-02-11 01:32 -0800
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 05:06 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 22:26 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 06:44 -0500
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 00:11 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 20:54 +0000
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 09:45 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-11 23:17 +0000
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:43 +1100
Re: Clocks tick _forward, not backwards. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-02-12 05:09 -0500
Quasar redshift HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 08:56 -0800
Quasar redshift john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 09:12 -0800
Re: Quasar redshift benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Quasar redshift noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 15:47 -0800
Re: Quasar redshift Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-07 18:47 -0600
The dopplerianS noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 19:20 -0800
csiph-web