Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #605686
| From | Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: This is your guru |
| Date | 2016-11-21 15:00 +0000 |
| Organization | NA |
| Message-ID | <o0v276$44d$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <cZydnclGLJ3J6q3FnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <o0pv41$lj2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o0smvm$vd$1@dont-email.me> <o0t19k$128b$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o0td2p$u15$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Steven Carlip wrote: >> What fields, GR is not about fields. Reread your books immediately. >> What Einstein did then was strongly presumable something under his >> Aether umbrella. You too misunderstood the entire process. > > Let me make three suggestions: > 1. Learn what the word "field" means in physics. Irrelevant to the subject, but did you? > 2. Before you start talking about what Einstein did, read a little > Einstein. You could start with the basic paper on GR, Die Grundlage der Nothing > 3. Try responding to content, rather than looking for semantic tricks. > Steve Carlip I would opt for 3. if I were you. On to the subject, gravity cannot possibly travel at any speed, since is a geometry, curvature in GR, hence similar to the projection of a shadow. No matter how fast or slow you shake your head, its shadow will never leave the association with your head. Your gravity "field" is to Matter/Mass what a Shadow is for an opaque object.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: This is your guru Norberto Haman <norberman@norberman.info> - 2016-11-20 20:32 +0000
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-20 15:54 -0800
Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-21 15:00 +0000
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-21 19:16 -0800
Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-22 10:39 +0000
Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-22 11:24 +0000
Re: This is your guru Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-11-22 12:13 +0000
Re: This is your guru benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:37 -0500
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-22 22:57 -0800
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 13:37 +0000
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 14:27 +0000
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 14:56 +0000
Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-23 10:46 -0800
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-23 23:21 +0100
Re: This is your guru Bob Goodman <bobg@boobgodman.info> - 2016-11-23 22:58 +0000
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-25 20:00 +0100
Re: This is your guru john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 05:39 -0800
Re: This is your guru Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 19:25 +0100
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 18:28 +0000
Re: This is your guru Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 19:37 +0100
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 18:39 +0000
Re: This is your guru edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 10:51 -0800
Re: This is your guru Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:24 -0600
Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 15:33 +0000
Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-23 23:23 +0100
Re: This is your guru john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:58 -0800
Re: This is your guru edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 10:49 -0800
Re: This is your guru poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-26 01:51 -0800
csiph-web