Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #524646

Re: green stars

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

In article <PM0005215B50CBB539@aca40732.ipt.aol.com>,
jmfbahciv  <See.above@aol.com> wrote:
>Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>> In article <PM00052148602F2733@aca41f97.ipt.aol.com>,
>> jmfbahciv  <See.above@aol.com> wrote:
>>>Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>>>> In article <mur018$5ei$1@panix3.panix.com>,
>>>> William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>>In article <nvnzI5.15Dv@kithrup.com>,
>>>>>djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I managed to get an A in my one physics course (Physics 10, aka
>>>>>> Bonehead Physics), but I do not understand anything past Newton.
>>>>>> I haven't had to.  I take it on faith.
>>>>>
>>>>>Did you drop a '1' off the end of that, or was the course really
>>>>>"Physics [ten]?"
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> Its official title, I think, was "physics for Humanities Majors".
>>>> Everybody enrolled in the College of Letters and Sciences, who
>>>> wasn't actually majoring in a science, had to take it.  In a
>>>> similar way, those majoring in math or sciences, if they couldn't
>>>> pass a basic entrance exam in written English (in which case
>>>> they'd take the standard lower-division English courses like the
>>>> rest of us) would take English 10, which of course was called
>>>> Bonehead English.
>>>>
>>>> Mind you, this was nearly sixty years ago; I don't know what they
>>>> do now.
>>>>
>>>When I went to college, we were required to take an Honors Physics
>>>course which was real physics without using calculus.  The art
>>>majors were not interested in the course until they figured out
>>>it helped them with their art which was mostly drawing and
>>>painting.
>>
>> We did not, thank heaven, have to use calculus.  Just algebra.
>> At which I was not very good either.
>>
>> I know I've told this story before, but it's been a while.  If
>> you remember it from last time, hit 'n' now.
>>
>> I was living in a rooming house where we did our own cooking.
>> There was a kitchen on the ground floor and another (small)
>> kitchen on the third floor, where I lived.  One of my housemates
>> was not only taking Physics 10 when I was, but we had the same
>> section with the same TA.  So we got the same problem sets, which
>> the TA handed out at the Tuesday section and got back at the
>> Thursday section.
>>
>> So every Wednesday evening she and I would settle down in the
>> third-floor kitchen and do the problem sets.  She had, and knew
>> how to use, a slide rule.  I didn't.
>>
>> So we would both read the problem, and I would set up the
>> equation, and she would solve it with her slide rule.  We would
>> thus have exactly the same answers on our problem sets, and get
>> the same grades on them.  We got some credit toward our final
>> grade from the problem sets, more from the midterm, and a lot
>> more from the final.
>>
>> Came the final, and we were put into a much larger room than we'd
>> taken the class in, so we could be separated from one another by
>> several seats; standard procedure.  Memory tells me now that
>> there were several hundred problems to solve; it was probably
>> more like 100.  And there I sat, with no slide rule, just basic
>> arithmetic, at which I have always stunk.  (And there were no
>> electronic calculators, back in the early 1950s.)
>>
>> After a moment of despair, I reasoned, "Well, this is a physics
>> class, not a math class, so if I set up all the equations and
>> then solve as many as there's time for by brute force and scratch
>> paper, I'll get at least partial credit."  So I did that.
>
>That's how engineers do it :-).  Crunching numbers is left
>as an exercise for computers.  I always thought that computers
>were invented so engineers didn't have to do arithmetic. ;-)

Well, the *original* intention was so that US Army artillery
personnel didn't have to use arithmetic.
>
>>  I got
>> maybe halfway through the arithmetic by time's end.  Meanwhile,
>> my housemate was doing whatever she did, armed with her slide
>> rule.
>>
>> Came the final, I got an A, she got a C.
>
>It's interesting how diffeent approaches to the same problems
>produce different results.

I can only assume that because I did the setting-up, she didn't
get enough practice in that.  A lesson to all of us, I guess.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Should you wish to email me, you'd better use the gmail edress.
Kithrup's all spammy and hotmail's been hacked.
>/BAH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-02 01:17 -0700
  Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 08:19 -0500
    Re: green stars john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 06:30 -0700
      Re: green stars Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 08:59 -0500
        Re: green stars benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 12:24 -0400
          Re: green stars HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 10:19 -0700
        Re: green stars Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-03 12:14 +0200
  Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-02 14:40 -0400
    Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-02 22:18 +0000
      Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 17:45 -0500
        Re: green stars Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2015-10-05 08:30 -0700
      Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 16:02 -0700
        Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-03 02:29 +0000
          Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 22:29 -0700
          Re: green stars Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2015-10-03 23:49 -0300
            Re: green stars "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 08:48 +0100
              Re: green stars Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 11:07 -0500
                Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-04 12:50 -0400
                Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 10:54 -0700
                Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 13:21 -0400
                Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-04 11:15 -0600
                Re: green stars Stumpy <perilmung@spamnet.con> - 2015-10-05 13:39 -0700
            Re: green stars "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-10-04 09:27 -0400
            Re: green stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 16:45 -0400
        Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-03 17:40 -0400
          Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:51 -0700
          Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-03 21:54 +0000
            Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:24 -0700
            Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-04 06:46 -0400
              Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-04 13:15 +0000
                Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-04 14:27 +0000
                Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-04 16:53 +0000
                Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-05 13:02 +0000
                Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-05 14:39 +0000
                Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-06 13:34 +0000
                Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 14:24 +0000
                Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-07 13:18 +0000
                Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-07 19:27 -0400
                Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-07 19:43 -0400
                Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-08 01:58 -0600
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 01:11 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 13:49 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 21:20 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-09 22:04 -0700
                Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-08 08:19 -0400
                Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-08 08:59 -0700
                Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-09 00:10 -0600
                Re: green stars William Vetter <mdhangton@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 13:19 -0400
                Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-09 21:27 -0400
                Re: green stars Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-10 20:12 -0600
                Re: green stars Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 19:08 -0500
                Re: green stars Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2015-10-05 17:20 -0700
                Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 01:09 +0000
                Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 22:21 -0400
                Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-06 02:33 +0000
                Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 23:03 -0400
                Re: green stars Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2015-10-05 22:03 -0700
                Re: green stars Wayne Brown <fwbrown@bellsouth.net> - 2015-10-08 19:38 +0000
                Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-08 22:19 +0000
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 16:14 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 16:16 -0700
                Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-08 17:33 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 19:33 -0700
                Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-08 19:59 -0700
                Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:36 -0400
                Re: green stars djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-10-09 04:19 +0000
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-09 11:12 -0700
                Re: green stars scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-10-09 14:05 +0000
                Re: green stars "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 18:57 -0400
                Re: green stars jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-10-06 13:34 +0000
                Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 10:57 -0700
              Re: green stars "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2015-10-04 10:41 -0400
                Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-04 13:43 -0400
      Re: green stars wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-10-02 22:38 -0400
      Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-03 17:37 -0400
        Re: green stars Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:52 -0700
        Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:36 -0500
          Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:39 -0700
            Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:55 -0700
        Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 01:17 -0700
          Re: green stars Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 14:04 -0400
            Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 13:07 -0500
            Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 12:58 -0700
              Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-05 23:52 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 10:24 -0700
                Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-06 11:39 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 12:35 -0700
                Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-06 13:20 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 15:15 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 15:31 -0700
                Re: green stars pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-06 15:58 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 23:12 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-06 23:34 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-07 00:49 -0700
                Re: green stars The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-08 21:24 -0700
  Re: green stars "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 13:26 -0700
    Re: green stars "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 09:58 -0700
  Re: green stars Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 07:53 -0500

csiph-web