Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #597999
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False |
| Date | 2016-09-23 06:59 +0200 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <ns2cs2$c7p$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <2068082e-dc0f-45fd-859a-beddb32ca94b@googlegroups.com> <nrjvb4$3ah$1@dont-email.me> <e1a8b6c8-1410-40ef-8647-e4045b191400@googlegroups.com> <ns1bsu$nma$1@dont-email.me> <8886cfa0-10e3-46f9-9be8-6f4a6a1ac900@googlegroups.com> |
Dne 23/09/2016 v 05:55 Tim BandTech.com napsal(a): > On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 3:37:15 PM UTC-4, Poutnik Fornntp wrote: >> On 09/22/2016 04:14 PM, Tim BandTech.com wrote: >> >> simple mechanical simulation of a coupled system >> would reveal you that it is not big deal. >> >> A humble idea you may misunderstood something >> brings usually much better results >> than a proud idea you have found something >> what hundreds of physicists overlook for a hundred years... > > Reading between the lines I have to conclude that you are uncomfortable > with the propagation of heat versus sound in a crystalline lattice > where the freedoms of the gas state do not exist. ............ Why ? It just follows different rules. Aside of that, you ideas have to address both crystalline and gas cases. > ..................................................How can heat > energy remain so well localized? It cannot under the kinetic > model, for every motion of every atom is so tightly coupled to > its neighbor that the heat energy should dissipate rapidly. ... It can easily do so, if you do the proper analysis. > ............................................................ It > does not do so. You have gone over to a more loosely coupled > environment, but generally gases are fair thermal insulators, > which actually contradicts your own statement. Which one ? From the mean molecule gas speed and gas thermal capacity is easily derivable its thermal conductivity, with the gas theory. > .............................................. I would prefer > a falsification of my argument over your present course. The > crystalline lattice lays out a simpler configuration. Indeed > if we were to consider the energy storage ability in heat versus > sound we will arrive in another quagmire. Tremendous heat energy > can be stored, but not so with sound energy. What is so surprising on it ? -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-05 00:54 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-06 04:20 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-06 23:52 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-09 08:35 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-11 01:42 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 08:54 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-17 06:07 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-17 10:23 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 19:43 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-22 07:14 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 17:04 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 17:48 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 21:37 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-22 20:55 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 06:59 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 08:59 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-23 08:43 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 18:06 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-23 09:17 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 11:28 -0500
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-24 08:40 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:09 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:47 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:30 -0500
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-24 12:49 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 15:29 -0500
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-25 07:24 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 17:54 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:47 -0500
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-26 06:47 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 18:16 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 18:24 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-29 09:04 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 18:57 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 19:02 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-30 07:00 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:05 -0500
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-30 08:26 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 18:17 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-02 05:48 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 08:51 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 10:19 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 17:39 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 17:52 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-26 18:51 -0400
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 08:37 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 08:39 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 10:16 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 18:36 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 15:44 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 17:18 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 17:31 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-24 11:34 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 21:21 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-25 08:38 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 18:55 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 09:07 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 09:30 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-26 04:45 -0700
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 14:53 +0200
Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 15:52 +0200
Re: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics: Obviously False Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-09-19 12:38 -0400
csiph-web