Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #597306

Re: Is Electric field m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s times Magnetic Field? TALK

From Serigo <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Is Electric field m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s times Magnetic Field? TALK
Date 2016-09-17 12:31 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nrjumm$1k8j$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <96617156-7fbc-4e37-a08a-5b058b9ce2a1@googlegroups.com> <nrhctu$1tlb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <25a3033a-1096-4323-bf95-9ae3e9efc791@googlegroups.com> <nribss$17nf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5a35c611-e512-40c7-9878-8b870ad9d62b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/16/2016 11:35 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 10:05:04 PM UTC-5, Serigo wrote:
> (snipped)
>>
>> I will help you over the hard parts, like Maxwells equations, E
>> Fields, Tensors, etc no problem if you like.
>
> Alright, then, what is your opinion of which of these two should be
> the Electric Field:
>
> Should the Electric Field be kg*m/A*s^3 which you believe in.
>
> Or should the Electric Field be kg*m^2/A*s^3
>
>
> Now I tell you why I believe it should be  kg*m^2/A*s^3, because when
> it is that, we have the Electric Field as equal to m^2/s times the
> Magnetic Field. If we chose your Electric Field, we have the Magnetic
> Field times m/s, a velocity upon the Magnetic Field.
>
> So, if I am correct, the Electric Field should be m^2/s times
> Magnetic Field kg/A*s^2
>
> If you are correct, then the Electric Field should be m/s times
> Magnetic Field kg/A*s^2
>
> The reason I believe yours is wrong, is because it means that
> Electric Field is velocity of a Magnetic Field and that would mean no
> static electricity exists, and also, yours would not conform to
> Faraday's law since the Electric Field of yours is already in motion
> and the bar magnet is in motion.
>
> The reason that mine is superior is because it allows for static
> electricity to exist because m^2 is cross section and 1/s is
> frequency, so the frequency of cross section allows static
> electricity and it also allows the thrusting bar magnet in Faraday
> Law to produce a electric current because the Electric Field is the
> Voltage. Where there really is no Electric Field because the Voltage
> is the electric field.
>
> So, what do you think?
>
> Is Electric field  m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s?
>
> AP
>

Halliday & Resnick, PHYSICS, 1986, extended version, part2, page A21 at 
the back of the book gives these:

velocity or speed = m/s

acceleration = m/s^2


Electric fields and Magnetic fields are vector Fields, therefor have 
directional component at each point, and you have to look at the dot 
product and cross product.  you are using scalars, but these are vector 
fields.

for our readers...

https://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/siderive.html

Derived Unit 	Measures 	Derivation 	Formal Definition
hertz (Hz) 	frequency 		/s 	s-1
newton (N) 	force 		kg·(m/s2) 	kg·m·s-2
pascal (Pa) 	pressure 		N/m2 	kg·m-1·s-2
joule (J) 	energy or work	 	N·m 	kg·m2·s-2
watt (W) 	power 			J/s 	kg·m2·s-3
coulomb (C) 	electric charge 	A·s 	A·s
volt (V) 	electric potential 	W/A 	kg·m2·s-3·A-1
farad (F) 	electric capacitance 	C/V 	kg-1·m-2·s4·A2
ohm (omega) 	electric resistance 	V/A 	kg·m2·s-3·A-2
siemens (S) 	electric conductance 	A/V 	kg-1·m-2·s3·A2
weber (Wb) 	magnetic flux 		V·s 	kg·m2·s-2·A-1
tesla (T) 	magnetic flux density 	Wb/m2 	kg·s-2·A-1
henry (H) 	inductance 		Wb/A 	kg·m2·s-2·A-2
degree Celsius (°C) 	temperature 	K - 273.15 	K
radian (rad) 	plane angle 		m·m-1
steradian (sr) 	solid angle 		m2·m-2
lumen (lm) 	luminous flux 		cd·sr 	cd·sr
lux (lx) 	illuminance 		lm/m2 	cd·sr·m-2
becquerel (Bq) 	activity 		/s 	s-1
gray (Gy) 	absorbed dose 		J/kg 	m2·s-2
sievert (Sv) 	dose equivalent 	Gy·(multiplier) 	m2·s-2
katal (kat) 	catalytic activity 	mol/s 	mol·s-1

The term derived unit covers any algebraic combination of the base 
units, but it is only the 22 combinations listed above that have 
approved special names. For example, the SI derived unit of momentum 
(mass times velocity) has no special name; momentum is stated in 
kilogram meters per second (kg·m/s) or in newton seconds (N·s). A few SI 
derived units do have special names that have been defined but not 
approved. Here are some examples:

Derived Unit 	Measures 		Derivation
stere (st) 	volume 			m3
diopter (dpt) 	refractive power 	m-1
thermal ohm 	thermal resistance 	K/W
poiseuille (Pl 	dynamic viscosity 	Pa·s
rayl 		sound impedance 	Pa·s/m
acoustic ohm 	sound resistance 	Pa·s/m3
daraf 		electric elastance 	F-1
talbot 		luminous energy 	lm·s
nit (nt) 	luminance 		cd/m2
molal 		chemical concentration 	mol/kg

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:12 -0700
  elimination of Electric Field, since it is voltage Re: Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 02:57 -0700
    proving evidence that Electric Field does not exist, and that the DNA molecule is a parallel plate capacitor of bases TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 10:46 -0700
      Re: proving evidence that Electric Field does not exist, and that the DNA molecule is a parallel plate capacitor of bases TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-16 13:16 -0500
        jerk who thinks Electric Field is kg/A(velocity), with a constant velocity; how do you have static electricity?? TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 14:38 -0700
          Re: jerk who thinks Electric Field is kg/A(velocity), with a constant velocity; how do you have static electricity?? TALK moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-17 02:36 +0000
            Is Electric Field kg/A*s^2 times m^2/s or is it kg*/A*s^2 times m/s ;;TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 20:46 -0700
          Re: jerk who thinks Electric Field is kg/A(velocity), with a constant velocity; how do you have static electricity?? TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-16 22:04 -0500
            Is Electric field  m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s times Magnetic Field?  TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 21:35 -0700
              Why no electric field exists, but Voltage takes its place Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 01:48 -0700
              Re: Is Electric field m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s times Magnetic Field? TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-17 12:31 -0500
  Re: Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-16 09:07 -0500
    Re: Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-09-17 11:01 -0700

csiph-web