Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #597306
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Is Electric field m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s times Magnetic Field? TALK |
| Date | 2016-09-17 12:31 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nrjumm$1k8j$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <96617156-7fbc-4e37-a08a-5b058b9ce2a1@googlegroups.com> <nrhctu$1tlb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <25a3033a-1096-4323-bf95-9ae3e9efc791@googlegroups.com> <nribss$17nf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5a35c611-e512-40c7-9878-8b870ad9d62b@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/16/2016 11:35 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 10:05:04 PM UTC-5, Serigo wrote: > (snipped) >> >> I will help you over the hard parts, like Maxwells equations, E >> Fields, Tensors, etc no problem if you like. > > Alright, then, what is your opinion of which of these two should be > the Electric Field: > > Should the Electric Field be kg*m/A*s^3 which you believe in. > > Or should the Electric Field be kg*m^2/A*s^3 > > > Now I tell you why I believe it should be kg*m^2/A*s^3, because when > it is that, we have the Electric Field as equal to m^2/s times the > Magnetic Field. If we chose your Electric Field, we have the Magnetic > Field times m/s, a velocity upon the Magnetic Field. > > So, if I am correct, the Electric Field should be m^2/s times > Magnetic Field kg/A*s^2 > > If you are correct, then the Electric Field should be m/s times > Magnetic Field kg/A*s^2 > > The reason I believe yours is wrong, is because it means that > Electric Field is velocity of a Magnetic Field and that would mean no > static electricity exists, and also, yours would not conform to > Faraday's law since the Electric Field of yours is already in motion > and the bar magnet is in motion. > > The reason that mine is superior is because it allows for static > electricity to exist because m^2 is cross section and 1/s is > frequency, so the frequency of cross section allows static > electricity and it also allows the thrusting bar magnet in Faraday > Law to produce a electric current because the Electric Field is the > Voltage. Where there really is no Electric Field because the Voltage > is the electric field. > > So, what do you think? > > Is Electric field m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s? > > AP > Halliday & Resnick, PHYSICS, 1986, extended version, part2, page A21 at the back of the book gives these: velocity or speed = m/s acceleration = m/s^2 Electric fields and Magnetic fields are vector Fields, therefor have directional component at each point, and you have to look at the dot product and cross product. you are using scalars, but these are vector fields. for our readers... https://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/siderive.html Derived Unit Measures Derivation Formal Definition hertz (Hz) frequency /s s-1 newton (N) force kg·(m/s2) kg·m·s-2 pascal (Pa) pressure N/m2 kg·m-1·s-2 joule (J) energy or work N·m kg·m2·s-2 watt (W) power J/s kg·m2·s-3 coulomb (C) electric charge A·s A·s volt (V) electric potential W/A kg·m2·s-3·A-1 farad (F) electric capacitance C/V kg-1·m-2·s4·A2 ohm (omega) electric resistance V/A kg·m2·s-3·A-2 siemens (S) electric conductance A/V kg-1·m-2·s3·A2 weber (Wb) magnetic flux V·s kg·m2·s-2·A-1 tesla (T) magnetic flux density Wb/m2 kg·s-2·A-1 henry (H) inductance Wb/A kg·m2·s-2·A-2 degree Celsius (°C) temperature K - 273.15 K radian (rad) plane angle m·m-1 steradian (sr) solid angle m2·m-2 lumen (lm) luminous flux cd·sr cd·sr lux (lx) illuminance lm/m2 cd·sr·m-2 becquerel (Bq) activity /s s-1 gray (Gy) absorbed dose J/kg m2·s-2 sievert (Sv) dose equivalent Gy·(multiplier) m2·s-2 katal (kat) catalytic activity mol/s mol·s-1 The term derived unit covers any algebraic combination of the base units, but it is only the 22 combinations listed above that have approved special names. For example, the SI derived unit of momentum (mass times velocity) has no special name; momentum is stated in kilogram meters per second (kg·m/s) or in newton seconds (N·s). A few SI derived units do have special names that have been defined but not approved. Here are some examples: Derived Unit Measures Derivation stere (st) volume m3 diopter (dpt) refractive power m-1 thermal ohm thermal resistance K/W poiseuille (Pl dynamic viscosity Pa·s rayl sound impedance Pa·s/m acoustic ohm sound resistance Pa·s/m3 daraf electric elastance F-1 talbot luminous energy lm·s nit (nt) luminance cd/m2 molal chemical concentration mol/kg
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 19:12 -0700
elimination of Electric Field, since it is voltage Re: Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 02:57 -0700
proving evidence that Electric Field does not exist, and that the DNA molecule is a parallel plate capacitor of bases TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 10:46 -0700
Re: proving evidence that Electric Field does not exist, and that the DNA molecule is a parallel plate capacitor of bases TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-16 13:16 -0500
jerk who thinks Electric Field is kg/A(velocity), with a constant velocity; how do you have static electricity?? TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 14:38 -0700
Re: jerk who thinks Electric Field is kg/A(velocity), with a constant velocity; how do you have static electricity?? TALK moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-17 02:36 +0000
Is Electric Field kg/A*s^2 times m^2/s or is it kg*/A*s^2 times m/s ;;TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 20:46 -0700
Re: jerk who thinks Electric Field is kg/A(velocity), with a constant velocity; how do you have static electricity?? TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-16 22:04 -0500
Is Electric field m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s times Magnetic Field? TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 21:35 -0700
Why no electric field exists, but Voltage takes its place Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 01:48 -0700
Re: Is Electric field m/s times Magnetic Field or is it m^2/s times Magnetic Field? TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-17 12:31 -0500
Re: Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-16 09:07 -0500
Re: Voltage replacing electric-field and replacing EMF, electromotive force TALK Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-09-17 11:01 -0700
csiph-web