Re: Nuclei actually have near zero velocity when fusion occurs during beam fusion...

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Nuclei actually have near zero velocity when fusion occurs during beam fusion...
Date	2016-08-23 11:13 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nphsnv$1al$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <133dbd33-c875-484b-a0b2-580cb87ed58f@googlegroups.com> <np7skv$1uis$1@gioia.aioe.org> <77b93c3e-ab5a-4e9f-807a-8b488dd9505b@googlegroups.com> <npdcc9$1cd8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <205ad94c-1c8c-4164-b1f8-66b89c21347b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/23/2016 10:59 AM, Sven Andersson wrote:
> Den måndag 22 augusti 2016 kl. 01:10:06 UTC+2 skrev Odd Bodkin:
>> On 8/20/2016 11:56 AM, Sven Andersson wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes, I saw your arguments and they are not convincing. When you irradiate, say a solid lithium
>>>>>>> target with protons of high energy there is a lot of radiation flying around, some of it
>>>>>>> bremsstrahlung (from protons that make near misses) and some of it from fusion. Meaning, that
>>>>>>> the important radiation that I claim exists, will be missed by scientists. Remember; only one
>>>>>>> nucleus in a million is on a trajectory that leads exactly towards a target nucleus. Very precise
>>>>>>> measurements may be able to detect that radiation though.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm talking about collider experiments, not fixed target experiments. In
>>>>> a collider experiment you are directly looking at nucleon-nucleon
>>>>> interactions.
>>> The interaction of the charged particles, the nuclei, leads to kinetic energy being transformed into EM
>>> energy. Depending on the trajectory of the particles there will be created, sequentially EM quanta with
>>> increasing energy. Sometimes (one in a million) all of the kinetic energy, or almost all will go into EM
>>> energy. In that case the last EM quantum is probably a gamma ray photon. It will be missed, most likely,
>>> by investigators because there is so much other radiation.
>>>
>>
>> I really think you should take a look at the instrumentation of a
>> collider detector. The entire interaction region is surrounded by EM
>> calorimetry, whose sole function is to NOT miss EM energy (usually in
>> the form of gammas and X-rays), except for a tiny aperture where the
>> beams pass through.
>>
>> The fact is, this bremsstrahlung radiation that you claim is associated
>> with the slowdown of the interacting hadrons would be easily observed in
>> the surrounding detector if it were there. But it is not seen, which you
>> will see if you actually looked at some experimental papers in the
>> field. This lack of evidence of something you definitively predict is
>> sufficient to rule out your theory.
>>
>> On a basic note, you should be concerned if you are presenting a theory
>> which has an explanation with observable outcomes, but the only way you
>> can maintain your hope in the theory is by claiming that the observable
>> outcome is not really observable. If the theory is not TESTABLE through
>> observations, then it isn't really a viable theory in the first place.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
> Alright, direct me to several such experimental papers so that I can read
> for myself. Thanks in advance, if you take the time to do this!
>

I had presumed that you know how to do this:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=DZero+collaboration&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=CDF+collaboration&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ALICE+collaboration&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ALICE+collaboration&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=CMS+collaboration&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

csiph-web