Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #592761
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality |
| Date | Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Lines | 33 |
| Message-ID | <nohv6e$sdd$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4d3d1cdd-26d4-4eff-bd85-0fe247a4aa9c@googlegroups.com> <gdjnqbt3cm5pqafc8q46bvh3ddfgkb91io@4ax.com> <4758b518-32d5-4f21-90c5-2347239863af@googlegroups.com> <rpjoqblphj2p68c0bl504ivq5kme446690@4ax.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | shell01.theworld.com |
| X-Trace | pcls7.std.com 1470922766 29101 192.74.137.71 (11 Aug 2016 13:39:26 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@TheWorld.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | nn/6.6.5 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:592761 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> writes: >On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:48:45 -0700 (PDT), Archimedes Plutonium ><plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote: >>So, how old are you? Too old and calcified to open your mind to >>learning logic and thinking straight and clear, or are young, and open >>to cracking the books on Logic instead of physics, until you have enough >>logic under your belt to do physics, properly. >I'm 58 years old. How about you? >I'm also exactly who I say I am. I don't post garbage so I don't need >a pseudonym like you. >Btw, I'm an electrical engineer specialized in computer structures >which is dependent on logic. I see little of it in your posts which is >why I usually have to "killfile" you. >Are we done here? >I'll give you one reply to this post before you get relegated to the >bit-bucket(killfile) so make it a good one - lol. You must be new here. :-) Archie Pu has been posting his crap here for decades. He always responds to anyone who questions him with personal attacks, saying the person is not logical like he is or not a person of science. Which is funny since none of his "proofs" follow logic, he jumps to conclusions that all his hunches are 100% true (because he thought them up). Even when those conclusions go contrary to observation (such as no such thing as repulsive electromagnetic force or no such thing as an electric field).
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:27 -0700
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:41 -0700
but, one has to actually read that stuff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 17:53 -0700
proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 02:30 -0700
Gouy and now Faraday Effect Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:11 -0700
Re: Gouy and now Faraday Effect Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:20 -0700
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 07:57 -0500
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 07:04 -0700
area of waveform at a moment in time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 10:58 -0700
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-10 21:03 -0400
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 22:23 -0400
Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 21:48 -0700
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 22:23 -0700
geometry of Light Wave Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 00:34 -0700
what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:27 -0700
Re: what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 11:08 -0700
Re: what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:17 -0700
can you have magnetism in Space that has no rest mass nearby? /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 21:25 -0700
two more new Maxwell Equations? /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 12:26 -0700
huffenpuffen, timennspacenn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 17:58 -0700
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-11 06:21 -0400
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-11 13:39 +0000
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:51 -0700
Re: Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-12 05:24 -0400
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-12 15:32 +0000
two-sided dice noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:50 -0700
csiph-web