Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #592761

Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality
Date Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines 33
Message-ID <nohv6e$sdd$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <4d3d1cdd-26d4-4eff-bd85-0fe247a4aa9c@googlegroups.com> <gdjnqbt3cm5pqafc8q46bvh3ddfgkb91io@4ax.com> <4758b518-32d5-4f21-90c5-2347239863af@googlegroups.com> <rpjoqblphj2p68c0bl504ivq5kme446690@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace pcls7.std.com 1470922766 29101 192.74.137.71 (11 Aug 2016 13:39:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent nn/6.6.5
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:592761

Show key headers only | View raw


Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> writes:

>On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 21:48:45 -0700 (PDT), Archimedes Plutonium
><plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote:

>>So, how old are you? Too old and calcified to open your mind to 
>>learning logic and thinking straight and clear, or are young, and open 
>>to cracking the books on Logic instead of physics, until you have enough 
>>logic under your belt to do physics, properly.

>I'm 58 years old. How about you?

>I'm also exactly who I say I am. I don't post garbage so I don't need
>a pseudonym like you.

>Btw, I'm an electrical engineer specialized in computer structures
>which is dependent on logic. I see little of it in your posts which is
>why I usually have to "killfile" you.

>Are we done here?

>I'll give you one reply to this post before you get relegated to the
>bit-bucket(killfile) so make it a good one - lol.

You must be new here. :-)

Archie Pu has been posting his crap here for decades. He always responds
to anyone who questions him with personal attacks, saying the person is
not logical like he is or not a person of science.  Which is funny since
none of his "proofs" follow logic, he jumps to conclusions that all his
hunches are 100% true (because he thought them up).  Even when those
conclusions go contrary to observation (such as no such thing as
repulsive electromagnetic force or no such thing as an electric field).

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:27 -0700
  Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:41 -0700
    but, one has to actually read that stuff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 17:53 -0700
  proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 02:30 -0700
    Gouy and now Faraday Effect Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:11 -0700
      Re: Gouy and now Faraday Effect Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:20 -0700
  Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 07:57 -0500
    Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 07:04 -0700
  area of waveform at a moment in time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 10:58 -0700
  Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-10 21:03 -0400
    Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 22:23 -0400
    Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 21:48 -0700
      Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 22:23 -0700
      geometry of Light Wave Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 00:34 -0700
        what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:27 -0700
          Re: what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 11:08 -0700
            Re: what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:17 -0700
            can you have magnetism in Space that has no rest mass nearby? /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 21:25 -0700
              two more new Maxwell Equations? /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 12:26 -0700
                huffenpuffen, timennspacenn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 17:58 -0700
      Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-11 06:21 -0400
        Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-11 13:39 +0000
          Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:51 -0700
          Re: Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-12 05:24 -0400
            Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-12 15:32 +0000
              two-sided dice noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:50 -0700

csiph-web