Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #592912
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality |
| Date | 2016-08-12 15:32 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <nokq6t$kda$3@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <gdjnqbt3cm5pqafc8q46bvh3ddfgkb91io@4ax.com> <4758b518-32d5-4f21-90c5-2347239863af@googlegroups.com> <rpjoqblphj2p68c0bl504ivq5kme446690@4ax.com> <nohv6e$sdd$1@pcls7.std.com> <kn4rqb9ts2q4jjjjg1qa74l7ebcdevfhou@4ax.com> |
Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> writes: >On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC), >moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >>You must be new here. :-) >Actually, I've been reading and writing in sci.physics (and a few >other sci.* groups) since first getting on the Internet in about >1995-96. I remember Archie from back then too. >Its been my experience that after about 3-4 levels of replies, many >threads in this group drift off topic and degenerate to personal >sniping. I've always been mindful that these posts are archived for >posterity and tried to keep personal insults and denigrations out of >my posts. I don't claim to be perfect on that. I have limits to what I >will put up with before responding in kind but I really try to stay on >topic and be polite as I can. Do note that Mr. Plutonium started insulting you right away for simply disagreeing with him, not after multiple levels of replies. Most people ignore or killfile him because of his lack of respect and inability to follow logic, so he mostly talks to himself here and he seems to be fine with that. >I'm >aware that most people in this group (as opposed to social media) are >actually trained in science and are qualified to speak on these >subjects being discussed. Not any more. This group is mostly full of kooks, and kookwatchers like myself, most of the real science people have been driven away. I'm mostly here watching the kooks kook, although I do like actual science the rare times some actually shows up.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:27 -0700
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:41 -0700
but, one has to actually read that stuff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 17:53 -0700
proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 02:30 -0700
Gouy and now Faraday Effect Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:11 -0700
Re: Gouy and now Faraday Effect Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:20 -0700
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 07:57 -0500
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 07:04 -0700
area of waveform at a moment in time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 10:58 -0700
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-10 21:03 -0400
Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality with Maxwell theory as axioms of Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 22:23 -0400
Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 21:48 -0700
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 22:23 -0700
geometry of Light Wave Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 00:34 -0700
what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 11:27 -0700
Re: what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 11:08 -0700
Re: what light waves and photons look like in New Physics /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:17 -0700
can you have magnetism in Space that has no rest mass nearby? /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 21:25 -0700
two more new Maxwell Equations? /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 12:26 -0700
huffenpuffen, timennspacenn noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 17:58 -0700
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-11 06:21 -0400
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-11 13:39 +0000
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 13:51 -0700
Re: Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-12 05:24 -0400
Re: Greenhorn wanting information on why Electric Field is science-fiction Re: proof that light waves are 4 B fields, no E-field /TALK: 7th ed. Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-12 15:32 +0000
two-sided dice noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:50 -0700
csiph-web