Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators
Date	2016-02-24 08:06 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nakdda$159r$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <01fa9815-e6a3-4c36-8661-0ca2d2aa7a40@googlegroups.com> <nahotp$tp9$4@gioia.aioe.org> <3bbfcf64-3c85-4ffd-ad8f-cda622aa4bb4@googlegroups.com> <naiemk$792$1@gioia.aioe.org> <be7e9d1e-298c-4561-8d1d-9420057c5e47@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/23/2016 6:26 PM, jay moseley wrote:
> Odd...
>> The ringing and collision of two neutron stars has a DIFFERENT signature than what
>> was observed. Again, if you would read the paper in detail, it explains how a neutron
>> star hypothesis does not fit data
>
> Unfortunately for some reason that full paper is not available for me. It does not
> open. Maybe a paywall. All I get is 4 figures and the captions. No mention
> of why neutron stars are not suitable. Believe me I would have
> read it by now if I could access it.

I have no problem accessing this link. It is open to the public.
https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0122/P150914/014/LIGO-P150914%3ADetection_of_GW150914.pdf

If you are having access problems with this URL, perhaps you have a 
limited internet service provider.

> Thats why I asked. If you dont know the answer, just say so.
> But from the available data the following is true.. Neutron
> merger templates are essentially identical to BH merger templates.

This is simply not true.

> The base frequency of the event before merger was about
> 40Hz. And binary neutron star systems are not ruled out at that
> same frequency in any other literature freely available. In other
> words I have read of no restriction on this being a neutron star
> binary merger. Unless this paper has the explanation.
> What reason does the paper give? Is it a secret?
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 12:25 -0800
  Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-20 22:16 +0100
    Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 04:19 -0800
      Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-21 04:39 -0800
      Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 01:31 -0500
        Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 08:59 -0600
          Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 07:03 -0800
            Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 14:40 -0500
  Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 15:55 -0600
  Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 01:47 -0800
    Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 22:46 -0800
      Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 01:44 -0800
        Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 05:58 -0800
          Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:14 -0800
        Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 12:31 -0600
          Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 11:44 -0800
            Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 14:26 -0800
            Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 08:04 -0600
              Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-23 12:01 -0800
                Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 14:16 -0600
                Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-23 16:26 -0800
                Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 08:06 -0600
  Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 11:57 -0600
  Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 10:46 -0800
    Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 14:16 -0600
      Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 12:29 -0800
        Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 15:40 -0600
        Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 16:00 -0600
        Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 14:29 -0800
        Re: Fatal Oversight by LIGO Conspirators HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:24 -0800

csiph-web