Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #547189
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Common Sense |
| Date | 2016-01-22 08:53 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <n7tfpg$2tf$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <0ea74e7d-522a-49e9-b990-78cece87de26@googlegroups.com> <ad88374b-8cd9-44a1-9735-dbccbea248ed@googlegroups.com> <7dc819bc-4843-441d-8c78-367ba035a652@googlegroups.com> |
On 1/22/2016 8:36 AM, john wrote: > You don't throw "hundreds of years" of > Science away. > Science "corrects" once in awhile. Well, John, on that point, sometimes the corrections are huge. Strict causal determinism, which was a cornerstone of classical physics in the 19th century, was found to be simply wrong. Just wrong. OK as an approximation, but not as a foundational principle. Independent space and time, also a cornerstone of Newtonian physics for three centuries, were discovered to be flat wrong. No matter how intuitive that feels. The fact that *all* of nature is based on fields, and not on the particles and waves of 19th century physics, was a huge leap and not really of the category "correction". The static, eternal universe was so entrenched in physicists' minds that even Einstein fought for it, but it turned out to be wrong. And it's not just physics. Infectious agents in the 19th century were thought to necessarily be living. But then there were viruses, which do not meet the criteria for live. So then people thought that the thing needed was DNA. Then came prions, and most biologists thought that was too much to accept, but indeed it ended up true. > Especially after spending billions on > fruitless endeavours like looking for > stupid shit like DM and gravity waves > when it has been LOGICALLY obvious > for decades that "gravitons" are > impossible > John, I just got through a post where I pointed out that no one ANYWHERE except for you thinks of gravitons as something traveling from body A to body B in STRAIGHT LINES to effect an attraction of B to A. That's not what gravitons do. So, yes, YOUR idea of gravitons defies logic, but not the REAL idea of gravitons, which you have yet to learn about by reading. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Common Sense john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 04:22 -0800
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:12 -0600
Re: Common Sense moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-22 14:51 +0000
Common Sense HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 05:35 -0800
Common Sense john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 06:36 -0800
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:53 -0600
Re: Common Sense john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:03 -0800
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:05 -0600
Re: Common Sense benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 14:05 -0500
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:13 -0600
Common Sense HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:32 -0800
Re: Common Sense benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 14:01 -0500
Re: Common Sense James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:25 -0800
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:29 -0600
Re: Common Sense benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 14:08 -0500
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 12:02 -0600
Re: Common Sense HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 03:59 -0800
Re: Common Sense benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Common Sense James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 00:44 -0800
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:34 -0600
Re: Common Sense James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:43 -0800
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:09 -0600
Re: Common Sense James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:13 -0800
Re: Common Sense Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:53 -0600
Re: Common Sense "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:13 -0800
Re: Common Sense benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 14:29 -0500
Re: Common Sense Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:31 -0800
csiph-web