Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #543062
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence |
| Date | 2016-01-04 16:33 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n6e6s7$bg2$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <hk6g8b18vquifqefjr85v95b316p39rp53@4ax.com> <0OSdndarsatgDxTLnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n6c8dl$54v$3@pcls7.std.com> <n6dq8c$sqd$2@pcls7.std.com> <VZCdnbBCF-MQDhfLnZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:n6dq8c$sqd$2@pcls7.std.com... >> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes: >> >>>Rocky wrote: >> >>>>Wow that is a lot of rambling for someone that can't comment on why the >>>>engine found in Nuke York City could not have come from Flight 175. >> >>>It was part of the engine turbine. The center part. >> >>>Of course if you actually had proof it wasn't from Flight 175, you would >>>have posted it. You would have posted actual evidence, not a k00kvid. >> >> Hello? Roger? You there? Are you are still running away? >> >> <crickets chirp> >ROTFLMAO because the real "KOOK videos" would be trying to support the >official story of 9/11 and that is why there are either none or next to >none. *STILL* no proof the engine part couldn't have come from Flight 175? Run away, Rocky!!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-02 00:48 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 06:08 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-02 07:43 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-02 17:22 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:46 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-03 15:28 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-03 22:47 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-04 12:57 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-04 09:43 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-04 16:33 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 04:00 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-07 09:06 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 20:05 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-08 08:44 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-08 14:32 -0500
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-08 17:15 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-08 23:25 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 05:38 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-09 07:46 -0500
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-09 14:50 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 05:35 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 05:35 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 04:04 -0600
csiph-web