Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #542802
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence |
| Date | 2016-01-02 17:22 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n6910j$g7s$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <Q4WdnS_GFvTP7hrLnZ2dnUU7-c2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <scff8bt1sk7ei85e0bq3s7dn9107l9dukd@4ax.com> <n6CdnVTCU5XqSRrLnZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:scff8bt1sk7ei85e0bq3s7dn9107l9dukd@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:48:53 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable >>>Evidence >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGHg1bQk9-o >>> >> >> Whereas your duck test has PROVED all 9/11 k00k vids are lies, we >> must presume this one is as well. >Too bad Michael proved the jets in Nuke York City where CGIs for me because >the jets and the CGIs went into the Twin Towers at the exact same speed. So there were both jets AND CGIs that went into the buildings? I never considered that possibility. But at least you now admit that jets flew into the buildings. >BTW you really should watch the above video and then comment on it since >that is the subject of this thread. <G> But since we know all kookvids are lies, and you claim that kookvid proves irrefutable evidence that 9/11 was an inside job/conspiracy, we know for a fact that 9/11 could not be an inside job. All without even watching it! Thanks, Rocky, for the proof that 9/11 was not an inside job or a conspiracy!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-02 00:48 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 06:08 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-02 07:43 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-02 17:22 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:46 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-03 15:28 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-03 22:47 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-04 12:57 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-04 09:43 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-04 16:33 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 04:00 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-07 09:06 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 20:05 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-08 08:44 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-08 14:32 -0500
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-08 17:15 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-08 23:25 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 05:38 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-09 07:46 -0500
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-09 14:50 +0000
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 05:35 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 05:35 -0600
Re: 3 Ways You Can PROVE 9/11 WTC Conspiracy/Inside Job - New Irrefutable Evidence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 04:04 -0600
csiph-web