Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #541554
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was a CGI job |
| Date | 2015-12-26 00:22 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n5kmjh$boa$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9J6dnaudOPo4J-fLnZ2dnUU7-fWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <KumdnfA5a8bRmOHLnZ2dnUU7-eGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n5hm04$u7k$1@dont-email.me> <n5imf8$grl$1@pcls7.std.com> <iJCdnXNUWMnP9ODLnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:n5imf8$grl$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>>
>>>And yet all the videos/photos, came out weeks later.
>>>Photoshop and video-editing can take weeks for most people to do to be
>>>good
>>>enough where the manipulation can't be spotted instantly.
>>>Even the ones that were released were quickly pulled by the government
>>>types
>>>who knew the editing would be spotted after some examination.
>>
>> Hardly. That day, and for several days afterward, they showed the impact
>> of Flight 175 over and over and over and over again.
>And you never stopped to wonder why they never slowed down or lost any
>parts?
Don't change the subject. The news media went on replay of the events
over and over and over again since before the towers collapsed. Besides,
I already told you how to see how the plane slowed down, plus you can see
parts fly out the north face.
> Shame on you for being such a sucker.
You're the sucker for believing all those kookvids being fed to you, even
after you proved they are all lies. Actually, I can think of a better
word for you than 'sucker' for believing them. It's 'sheeple'.
Don't forget to baa the next time you're given a new kookvid that feeds
you more lies.
>> From every angle,
>> too. They showed the towers collapsing over and over and over again.
>ROTFLMAO because the remains of the Twin Towers do not support a "collapse"
>at all since they support an MRR nuke that was planted deep underground.
But you already proved (with the Duck Test!!) no nukes were used.
BTW you never did explain what MRR nukes were. ("Magical R___ R___ Nukes",
right?)
>> They showed the burning Pentagon and the smoking crater in Shanksville
>> over and over and over and over again.
>And I'll bet you never used Google Earth to see that the crater had been
>there long before anybody ever claimed Flight 93 went down there. <G>
Evidence? I didn't think so.
>ROTFLMAO because that is how lies work. They show you the exact same
>bullshit over and over and over again and rely on you to miss the fact that
>Flight 175 was consistent with a CGI and that the remains of the Twin Towers
>were consistent with an MRR nuke and not a collapse. <G>
You already proved (with the Duck Test again!!!) no CGIs were used,
either, as well as no nukes.
>> Nothing could possibly be "quickly pulled" after airing so many times over
>> several days.
>Riiight. Maybe you should take a look at the following video that we never
>saw again after 9/11. <G>
Well, if "we never saw it again" why are you directing me to a kookvid
which supposedly has it?
The point stands. They were replaying Flight 175 crashing into the
South Tower over and over and over again starting from about a minute
after the actual impact. No time for anyone to create a CGI, much less
get it into all those different cameras that were all watching the
North Tower burn.
Have a Very Merry Kookmas for you and all your kooktard friends!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 09:16 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-23 08:01 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 10:50 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-23 09:05 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 14:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-24 09:18 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-24 18:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-25 02:50 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-25 06:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 06:44 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:07 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 08:09 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 12:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-26 17:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 10:39 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-26 14:51 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 16:14 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-26 20:24 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:26 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 08:55 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:58 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 16:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 16:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-28 01:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-31 17:10 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-01 06:46 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 07:32 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-01 17:50 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 12:03 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:36 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 01:40 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-12-28 11:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 04:57 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 08:55 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-29 16:59 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 14:34 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-29 21:37 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 16:34 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-29 23:09 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 17:19 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-30 10:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-31 16:54 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-01 06:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 00:40 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:36 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-03 07:02 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-04 13:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:36 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:47 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:47 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:46 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 12:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 14:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 16:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 21:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:57 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-24 03:18 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:56 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 14:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 16:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 15:35 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 18:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 17:34 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-24 00:00 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-23 23:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 08:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-25 07:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 06:55 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:08 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 20:06 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-26 10:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 07:03 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-25 09:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 09:08 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:10 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:09 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 10:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-26 09:50 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 11:37 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 11:36 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 08:27 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 21:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 08:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-24 09:38 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-24 20:46 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-24 17:00 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 00:43 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-24 19:38 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-25 06:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:46 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-25 07:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 06:56 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 06:18 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-27 02:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:26 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:56 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-24 03:11 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:56 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-24 06:46 -0800
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-24 20:46 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-25 02:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 09:55 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-25 06:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 10:03 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-26 00:22 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 19:26 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-26 03:25 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 22:21 -0600
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-26 10:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 07:03 -0600
csiph-web