Re: 9/11 was a CGI job

From	"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
References	(3 earlier) <n5imf8$grl$1@pcls7.std.com> <iJCdnXNUWMnP9ODLnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> <n5kmjh$boa$1@pcls7.std.com> <kLGdneVudb0FceDLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <n5l1bq$d0s$1@pcls7.std.com>
Subject	Re: 9/11 was a CGI job
Date	2015-12-25 22:21 -0600
Message-ID	<6badnZe87OTfi-PLnZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n5l1bq$d0s$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:n5kmjh$boa$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:n5imf8$grl$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>And yet all the videos/photos, came out weeks later.
>>>>>>Photoshop and video-editing can take weeks for most people to do to be
>>>>>>good
>>>>>>enough where the manipulation can't be spotted instantly.
>>>>>>Even the ones that were released were quickly pulled by the government
>>>>>>types
>>>>>>who knew the editing would be spotted after some examination.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hardly.  That day, and for several days afterward, they showed the
>>>>> impact
>>>>> of Flight 175 over and over and over and over again.
>>>
>>>>And you never stopped to wonder why they never slowed down or lost any
>>>>parts?
>>>
>>> Don't change the subject.  The news media went on replay of the events
>>> over and over and over again since before the towers collapsed. 
>>> Besides,
>>> I already told you how to see how the plane slowed down, plus you can 
>>> see
>>> parts fly out the north face.
>
>>ROTFLMAO because only an idiot would think CGIs could only be used on one
>>side of the building.  <G>
>
>>So it was a CGI in and a CGI out because the videos that were not altered 
>>do
>>not have CGIs on either side of the South Tower.  <G>
>
> Get back on topic.  How could they "pull" the videos if they were playing
> them over and over again starting from minutes after Flight 175 crashed
> into the South Tower.

They pulled the fcukups and modified the ones that needed more screams and 
chants of "The plane, the plane" just like that guy from Fantasy Island used 
to cry out.  See:

Fantasy Island TV Show Opening Theme Season One 1978
 https://youtu.be/1x_QbVDlLbI?t=33s


>>>> Shame on you for being such a sucker.
>>>
>>> You're the sucker for believing all those kookvids being fed to you, 
>>> even
>>> after you proved they are all lies.  Actually, I can think of a better
>>> word for you than 'sucker' for believing them.  It's 'sheeple'.
>>> Don't forget to baa the next time you're given a new kookvid that feeds
>>> you more lies.
>
>>All you proved was the real culprits altered the so called original videos
>>to try and cover up their fcuk ups.  BFD.
>
> Which proves all kookvids are fake, just like you showed us!

You have had the evidence right in front of your face all the time but you 
are too adicted to wanting to see a real crash to admit you never saw a real 
jet go into the Twin Towers.

>>>>>  From every angle,
>>>>> too.  They showed the towers collapsing over and over and over again.
>>>
>>>>ROTFLMAO because the remains of the Twin Towers do not support a
>>>>"collapse"
>>>>at all since they support an MRR nuke that was planted deep underground.
>>>
>>> But you already proved (with the Duck Test!!) no nukes were used.
>>> BTW you never did explain what MRR nukes were. ("Magical R___ R___ 
>>> Nukes",
>>> right?)
>
>>And yet you have no valid explanation for why two 110 story buildings
>>collapsed to a pile of rubble that was less than a floor high and don't 
>>give
>>me that basement bullshit without photos.  <G>
>
> You still don't have an explanation for what your imaginary "MRR Nukes"
> are?

Imaginary or not nothing else explains why the Twin Towers were vaporized 
better than MRR nukes so there must be some truth to them.

>>>>> They showed the burning Pentagon and the smoking crater in Shanksville
>>>>> over and over and over and over again.
>>>
>>>>And I'll bet you never used Google Earth to see that the crater had been
>>>>there long before anybody ever claimed Flight 93 went down there.  <G>
>>>
>>> Evidence?  I didn't think so.
>
>>You have had the evidence right in front of your face all the time.
>
> So you don't have any evidence, otherwise you would have provided it.
> So now we know it was just a field, with no crater or hole before 9/11.

Where did that piece of bullshit come from?  You should know how to work 
Google Earth to see for yourself that we were lied to about what caused that 
gash in Pranksville, PA.


>>> You already proved (with the Duck Test again!!!) no CGIs were used,
>>> either, as well as no nukes.
>
>>But all you did was tell unsupported lies just like your friends in the
>>media.
>
> No, saying CGIs and nukes were used is lying, because you proved that!
> Great job!!

Only in your mind.  Don't forget you have nothing to say the CGIs were real 
jets or that MRR nukes do not exist.  <G>

>>>>> Nothing could possibly be "quickly pulled" after airing so many times
>>>>> over
>>>>> several days.
>>>
>>>>Riiight.  Maybe you should take a look at the following video that we
>>>>never
>>>>saw again after 9/11.  <G>
>>>
>>> Well, if "we never saw it again" why are you directing me to a kookvid
>>> which supposedly has it?
>
>>And your proof that Flight 93 crashed in Pranksville/Shanksville is what?
>
> Changing the subject once again.  How could that video that "was never
> seen again" be in your kookvid for all to see?

Now your the one changing the subject.  Don't forget youtube can bring up 
videos that the media tried to supress and I'll bet some of the really good 
videos have been supressed anyway.


>>> The point stands.  They were replaying Flight 175 crashing into the
>>> South Tower over and over and over again starting from about a minute
>>> after the actual impact.  No time for anyone to create a CGI, much less
>>> get it into all those different cameras that were all watching the
>>> North Tower burn.
>
>>ROTFLMAO because they could have been prepared even before the South Tower
>>was hit.
>
> And just how were those CGIs gotten into hundreds of video cameras all
> over NYC?  You never did answer that!

Better recount.  Only professional cameras were used and some of those 
videos were ready to be picked up before the Twin Towers were vaporized. 
How else do you think they got them on the news so quickly?


>>> Have a Very Merry Kookmas for you and all your kooktard friends!
>
>>Oh, I'll let you have your own wishes back because they don't fit me 
>>anyway.
>
> That's the funny thing about you kooks.  You don't even realize you're
> kooks.

"

Thread

9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 09:16 -0600
  Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-23 08:01 -0800
    Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 10:50 -0600
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-23 09:05 -0800
        Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 14:49 -0500
          Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-24 09:18 -0800
            Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-24 18:44 +0000
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 15:44 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-25 02:50 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-25 06:09 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 06:44 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:07 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 08:09 -0800
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 12:21 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-26 17:36 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 10:39 -0800
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-26 14:51 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 16:14 -0800
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-26 20:24 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:26 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-27 08:55 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 03:58 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 16:32 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-27 16:29 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-28 01:13 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-31 17:10 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-01 06:46 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 07:32 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-01 17:50 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 12:03 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:36 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 01:40 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-12-28 11:02 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 04:57 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 08:55 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-29 16:59 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 14:34 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-29 21:37 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 16:34 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-29 23:09 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-29 17:19 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-30 10:32 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-31 16:54 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-01 06:34 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 00:40 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:36 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-03 07:02 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-04 13:20 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:36 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:47 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:47 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 17:46 -0600
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 12:36 -0500
        Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 14:47 -0500
          Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 16:16 -0500
            Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 21:37 -0500
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:43 -0500
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:57 -0600
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-24 03:18 +0000
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:56 -0600
    Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 14:44 -0500
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 16:02 -0500
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 15:35 -0600
        Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-23 18:25 -0500
          Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-23 17:34 -0600
            Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-24 00:00 +0000
            Re: 9/11 was a CGI job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-23 23:48 +0000
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:45 -0500
            Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:44 -0500
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 08:09 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-25 07:08 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 06:55 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:08 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 20:06 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-26 10:38 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 07:03 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-25 09:28 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 09:08 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:10 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:09 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-26 10:20 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-26 09:50 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 11:37 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 11:36 -0600
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 08:27 -0500
          Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-23 21:43 -0500
            Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-24 00:49 -0500
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 08:29 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-24 09:38 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-24 20:46 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-24 17:00 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 00:43 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-24 19:38 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-25 06:23 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:46 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-25 07:10 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 06:56 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 06:18 -0800
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-12-27 02:03 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 05:26 -0600
        Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:56 -0600
  Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-24 03:11 +0000
  Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:56 -0600
  Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-24 06:46 -0800
    Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-24 20:46 +0000
    Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-24 15:55 -0500
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-12-25 02:57 +0000
        Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 09:55 -0600
      Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-25 06:07 +0000
        Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 10:03 -0600
          Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-25 23:33 +0000
          Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-26 00:22 +0000
            Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 19:26 -0600
              Re: 9/11 was a CGI job moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-26 03:25 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-25 22:21 -0600
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-26 10:38 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was a CGI job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 07:03 -0600

csiph-web