Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #533378
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats |
| Date | 2015-11-15 22:04 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n3cnhc-8ge.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <YtqdnYoos-Wsb9XLnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <pan.2015.11.15.21.37.43@localhost.localdomain> |
Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:59:29 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> MIT study on aluminum foil hats >>> http://boingboing.net/2005/11/11/mit-study-on-aluminu.html >> > > Of course, the whole head cannot be covered without first cutting > it off (decapitation). > > That certainly would solve the paranoia problem. > > But it should be a straightforward matter to use Maxwell's equations > to determine the EM intensity inside of a metallic hemisphere (that > is open at the bottom). But far simpler and quicker to do empirical measurement with computer controlled test equipment that would plot the data for you in a few seconds. As computer contolled test equipment did not become common and affordable until the early 80's, it is no surprise you did not think of it. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MIT study on aluminum foil hats Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 14:59 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 21:05 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 13:24 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 13:26 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 21:58 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 21:37 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 22:04 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 23:00 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 23:05 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-15 16:06 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 22:57 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-15 19:51 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-16 02:33 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-16 10:12 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 09:28 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 12:52 -0500
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-16 19:43 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 21:55 -0500
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-16 23:04 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-16 19:39 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 03:24 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 03:26 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 12:42 -0500
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 12:40 -0500
csiph-web