Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #533397
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats |
| Date | 2015-11-15 22:57 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <f7fnhc-5re.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <YtqdnYoos-Wsb9XLnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n2avlv$5q3$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote: > On 11/15/2015 2:59 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >> MIT study on aluminum foil hats >>> http://boingboing.net/2005/11/11/mit-study-on-aluminu.html >> >> >>> Earlier this year, MIT engineers conducted an empirical study on the >>> efficacy of aluminum foil helmets to block mind control rays. They've >>> published the detailed results of their experiments online. From the >>> abstract: >> > >> > > > Aluminum does not stop low frequency waves, below 2Mhz, at all. Nor Copper. > > Need Iron content for that. Not true; RF is RF. Look up "skin effect" for why foil may not be the answer for low frequency. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MIT study on aluminum foil hats Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 14:59 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 21:05 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 13:24 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 13:26 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 21:58 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 21:37 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 22:04 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 23:00 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 23:05 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-15 16:06 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-15 22:57 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-15 19:51 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-16 02:33 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-16 10:12 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 09:28 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 12:52 -0500
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-16 19:43 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 21:55 -0500
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-16 23:04 -0600
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-16 19:39 +0000
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 03:24 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 03:26 -0800
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 12:42 -0500
Re: MIT study on aluminum foil hats benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 12:40 -0500
csiph-web