Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #523240

Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started )

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mu3p74$7ki$2@pcls7.std.com...

>> How did they get those elleged "CGIs" into all those thousands of cameras
>> and eyeballs?

>You had better recheck just who your alleged eye-witnesses were.  All but 
>one of them were clearly related to someone working for the networks.

All but one of the thousands of New Yorkers on the streets that day were
clearly related to someone working for the networks?  Is the entire city
related to someone working for the networks (except one)?

And you know this just how?  Don't tell me, you saw it in a four hour
kookvid made by another kooktard who just made that up.


>>  Did they project it into the air somehow?  How?  Remember,
>> the answer has to be consistent with 2001 technology.  Hollywood can't do
>> that even now.

>Don't forget, if one person says they saw a jet unsuspecting idiots will 
>also say they saw a jet.

You didn't answer the question.  How did they get that "CGI" into 
thousands of cameras and eyeballs?

>  That test has been done a proven.

Evidence?

>  And there was 
>at least one video where a woman refused to claim she saw a jet a second 
>time because she knew something was up and obviously didn't like to lie. 

So someone didn't see the jet.  Many people didn't.

>>>> Ironically, one of the best proofs how loud the impacts were was that
>>>> silent film, with no audio.  They are filming the south tower when the
>>>> second plane hit.  A fraction of a second later a man, facing away from
>>>> the tower, jumps suddenly as though startled by a loud noise.  (the 
>>>> delay
>>>> of course was due to the speed of sound from the tower to him)
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because there is a very good video that point out why the Evan
>>>Fairbanks video had the sound removed.  See:
>>
>> The point is, the man jumped when he heard the crash, even if the video
>> had no audio to record the crash itself.  I'm not interested in yet
>> another kookvid.

>You mean he jumped when he saw a light from an explosion or heard an 
>explosion.

He jumped from the sound of the explosion, just like I said.  He was 
facing away from the crash.

>  He certainly didn't jump from the sound of a jet

I never claimed he did.

>have jumped sooner.  Plus if he were the guy controlling the sound of a jet 
>then that explains why the sound wasn't turned off at the exact same time of 
>the alleged impact.

How or why would a random guy on the ground control a jet engine flying
hundreds of feet overhead?  That is so kooktarded!

>> The point remains that 108,342 truckloads of debris is a lot of evidence
>> that a large mass from the towers fell into the bathtub.

>Again, don't forget how many truckloads were hauled in because Nuke York 
>City was treated exactly like they had to treat Chernobyl.

Yes, you already said. 120 truckloads.  108,342 - 120 = 108,222 truckloads
of actual debris hauled out of the bathtub.  Satisfied?

>>>>>  You
>>>>>claim it went underground but then it would kill the Survivors in WTC1 
>>>>>and
>>>>>crush the free standing walls of both the Twin Towers.
>>>>
>>>> Why do you say this?  Give proof (and don't tell me to watch some
>>>> kookvid!)
>>>> The lower columns and "tridents" of the towers were very strong, to hold
>>>> up the weight of 110 stories.
>>
>>>They held the Twin Towers up for years and they were undamaged during the
>>>fire and should have keep holding the Twin Towers up.  They only failed 
>>>when
>>>they were vaporized by a nuke and if you look close the bottom of the 
>>>North
>>>Tower was even vaporized a bit too late because the top part had to smash
>>>itself to bits before the bottom started to fail.  <G>
>>
>> You didn't answer the question, kook.  Why would the mass of the towers
>> crashing into the sublevels cause the standing walls to fall?  Remember
>> the lower columns were very stout and strong, being thick enough to
>> support the weight of the towers.  Also the lower levels used traditional
>> column/beam construction, non-compromised beams would still support the
>> standing walls from below.

>There were more parts from the "exoskeleton" thrown free from the 
>vaporization area of a nuke than there were at the bottom of the Twin Towers 
>with the exception of the parts of the exoskeleton that never moved from 
>it's original location.  How do you explain that inconsistency?

Once again you didn't answer the question.  Why would the mass of the
towers crashing into the sublevels cause the standing walls to fall?

>You obviously never tried looking for the facts behind 9/11/01 for yourself 
>or you would have caught a lot of inconsistencies.  You have let yourself be 
>taken by stories without photos and you never even asked why there were no 
>photos.

Actually, I did.  Long ago a bunch of "Truthers" came in here and started
the same crap, mostly about WTC 7.  I was curious about that and 
investigated myself, reading both kooksites and regular references.
I concluded that the "Truthers" were either kooktarded or outright lying.
They all had bad science and misleading evidence.

>Take for instance the one part that might have come from a 757 at the 
>Pentagon.  Why just one part and why did it have vegetation on it that is 
>consistent with a crash of a 757 in Brazil?

Evidence?  (Real evidence, not a kookvid)  And they recovered 95% of
Flight 77 anyway.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:39 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-23 03:56 +0000
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 13:39 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-24 18:37 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:24 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-24 22:46 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 15:28 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 14:12 -0500
              Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 21:45 +0000
                Re: Rocky's delusions "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
                Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 22:28 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 06:09 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 16:57 -0500
                noun (Latin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 18:02 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-26 10:54 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:22 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:39 -0500

csiph-web