Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #522982

Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started )

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mtt7t4$hp5$1@pcls7.std.com...

>> http://www.convertalot.com/earthquake_power__calculator.html calculates a
>> 2.3 magnitude quake as 178 million joules.  This means 0.027% of the
>> collapse energy became seismic energy of 2.3 magnitude.  That seems rather
>> too low to me, but this was not a simple drop. Much of that energy went
>> into smashing floors and columns apart, smashing concrete to dust

>ROTFLMAO because that wasn't just dust that was ultra fine dust that could 
>float up up and away and do you have any idea how much energy is needed to 
>turn a car into ultra fine dust?

Do you realize how much energy 666 billion joules is?  But no matter.
There really wasn't that much dust compared to the total mass of the 
towers.

<snip weird but irrelevant car crash comparison>

>>, lots of
>> noise and so forth.

>And don't forget noise is easily added to videos.

To all of thousands of videos?  How?

Ironically, one of the best proofs how loud the impacts were was that
silent film, with no audio.  They are filming the south tower when the
second plane hit.  A fraction of a second later a man, facing away from
the tower, jumps suddenly as though startled by a loud noise.  (the delay
of course was due to the speed of sound from the tower to him)

>>  How "efficient" should a large mass dropped on
>> bedrock be at converting its kinetic energy to an earthquake signal?

>Too bad your evidence of a large mass dropped on the ground is missing.

1.5 million tons of debris (108,342 truckloads!) hauled out of the
"bathtub" is an awful lot of evidence that you're simply wrong.

>  You 
>claim it went underground but then it would kill the Survivors in WTC1 and 
>crush the free standing walls of both the Twin Towers.

Why do you say this?  Give proof (and don't tell me to watch some kookvid!)
The lower columns and "tridents" of the towers were very strong, to hold
up the weight of 110 stories.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:39 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-23 03:56 +0000
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 13:39 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-24 18:37 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:24 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-24 22:46 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-25 15:28 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 14:12 -0500
              Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 21:45 +0000
                Re: Rocky's delusions "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
                Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 22:28 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-26 06:09 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 16:57 -0500
                noun (Latin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 18:02 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-26 10:54 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:22 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:39 -0500

csiph-web