Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #520541
| From | Frances Espinosa <franesp@portio.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: SR is just another name for LET |
| Date | 2015-09-12 21:25 +0000 |
| Organization | Ckean Air Approximation |
| Message-ID | <mt258i$c6i$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <330a6ad2-a6e3-473e-91fd-c6f8063b6a53@googlegroups.com> <mt1f5d$ki2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <NqCdnRIxbKeI5WnInZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mt20mp$22j$1@speranza.aioe.org> <33abd8e3-89f3-4835-8f2b-08e8477e8aee@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
JanPB wrote: > the _Minkowski metric_ would emerge. Again, to some philosophers this is > troubling. For physics per se it's not an issue. It must be exactly why for physicist it is or should be. All those Tensors are IMMATERIAL. Modern Science is Material only. Immateriality is all about meta-physics, not Science, not Physics. The only material Tensors I know are those describing Divergent Matter. Have a nice weekend.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: SR is just another name for LET Frances Espinosa <franesp@portio.org> - 2015-09-12 21:25 +0000
csiph-web