Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #520391
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC |
| Date | 2015-09-11 22:45 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <msvhtt$jei$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <msnbj7$rt8$4@dont-email.me> <zeOdnTlf5oWDzm3InZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msq0ih$cgo$1@dont-email.me> <A7KdnQiHD43nZGzInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mssujv$of0$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 10/09/2015 23:03, Tony Dragon wrote: > On 10/09/2015 22:45, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:msq0ih$cgo$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 09/09/2015 16:43, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>> news:msnbj7$rt8$4@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 08/09/2015 17:56, Rocky wrote: >>>>>> People keep in mind that items like using an AM receiver to >>>>>> receive an >>>>>> EMP >>>>>> from an underground nuke only debunks the Mini Nuke theory and not >>>>>> the >>>>>> Nuclear Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers because an above >>>>>> ground >>>>>> EMP >>>>>> would be disastrous. >>>>>> >>>>>> As a matter of fact there are numerous items that debunk the >>>>>> mini-nukes >>>>>> theory but those same items can not be used to debunk the Nuclear >>>>>> Controlled >>>>>> Demolition of the Twin Towers. See: >>>>>> >>>>>> Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/thoughts-on-mini-nukes-theory-in-regard-to-nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> About turn, Rocky now does not believe in mini-nukes. >>>> >>>> No clown. Let me restate it. The "mini-nuke theory" is not the same >>>> thing >>>> as a "Nuclear Controlled Demolition." >>>> >>>> The "mini-nuke theory" only considers WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 where the >>>> "Nuclear >>>> Controlled Demolition" testimony considers WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC7 >>>> and >>>> Fiterman Hall. So why wouldn't I want to support the idea that >>>> explains >>>> the >>>> remains of the World Trade Center the best. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Your post :- >>> "As a matter of fact there are numerous items that debunk the mini-nukes >>> theory " >>> >>> Not mine. >> >> Yes, "theory" because the Nuclear Controlled Demolition of the Twin >> Towers >> uses testimony from someone that knows and not theory. DUH. >> >> Rocky >> >> > > Who would this person be? > How does he know? > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > So no answer, could your statement be a lie? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:56 -0500
Re: Rocky has never had a rational thought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:29 +0000
Re: Rocky has never had a rational thought "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:55 -0500
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:43 -0500
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 11:07 -0500
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:54 -0500
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-11 00:05 +0000
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC (Michael lies about the basements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 14:50 -0500
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-09 13:19 -0400
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 20:18 +0100
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-11 22:45 +0100
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 22:35 +0000
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:35 -0500
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:02 -0500
Re: More Rocky magic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 15:44 +0000
Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 18:09 +0200
csiph-web