Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #275466

Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC

From Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC
Date 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mssujv$of0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <KLWdnfT1jpZUj3LInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <msnbj7$rt8$4@dont-email.me> <zeOdnTlf5oWDzm3InZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msq0ih$cgo$1@dont-email.me> <A7KdnQiHD43nZGzInZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/09/2015 22:45, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:msq0ih$cgo$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 09/09/2015 16:43, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:msnbj7$rt8$4@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 08/09/2015 17:56, Rocky wrote:
>>>>> People keep in mind that items like using an AM receiver to receive an
>>>>> EMP
>>>>> from an underground nuke only debunks the Mini Nuke theory and not the
>>>>> Nuclear Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers because an above
>>>>> ground
>>>>> EMP
>>>>> would be disastrous.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a matter of fact there are numerous items that debunk the mini-nukes
>>>>> theory but those same items can not be used to debunk the Nuclear
>>>>> Controlled
>>>>> Demolition of the Twin Towers.  See:
>>>>>
>>>>> Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/thoughts-on-mini-nukes-theory-in-regard-to-nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> About turn, Rocky now does not believe in mini-nukes.
>>>
>>> No clown.  Let me restate it.  The "mini-nuke theory" is not the same
>>> thing
>>> as a "Nuclear Controlled Demolition."
>>>
>>> The "mini-nuke theory" only considers WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 where the
>>> "Nuclear
>>> Controlled Demolition" testimony considers WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC7
>>> and
>>> Fiterman Hall.  So why wouldn't I want to support the idea that explains
>>> the
>>> remains of the World Trade Center the best.
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Your post :-
>> "As a matter of fact there are numerous items that debunk the mini-nukes
>> theory "
>>
>> Not mine.
>
> Yes, "theory" because the Nuclear Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers
> uses testimony from someone that knows and not theory.  DUH.
>
> Rocky
>
>

Who would this person be?
How does he know?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:56 -0500
  Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
    Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:43 -0500
      Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-09 08:54 -0700
        Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 11:07 -0500
          Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-09 10:07 -0700
            Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:54 -0500
              Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC (Michael lies about the basements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 14:50 -0500
                Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC (Michael lies about the basements) Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-11 15:07 -0700
        Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-09 09:24 -0700
      Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-09 13:19 -0400
      Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 20:18 +0100
        Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:45 -0500
          Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
            Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-11 22:45 +0100
          Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:35 -0500
            Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:02 -0500
            Re: More Rocky magic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 15:44 +0000
            Re: Some Thoughts on Mini-Nukes Theory and Nuclear Demolition of WTC Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 18:09 +0200

csiph-web