Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #519112
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! |
| Date | 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <msf99f$bmg$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <fnAVl.48267$d36.34889@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <3pKdneQZp6BIgXbInZ2dnUU7-XednZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 05/09/2015 17:50, Rocky wrote: > "Freedom Fighter" <liberty@once.net> wrote in message > news:fnAVl.48267$d36.34889@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... >> 9/11 building collapses - it WAS controlled demolition! >> >> The proof? - watch this video: >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM&feature=player_embedded > > WTF? > > The first thing you have to do is realize the media wants you to think the > Twin Towers collapsed to the ground but there is another story. > Will this story be eligible for the Man Booker Prize? > The fact is the Twin Towers left very little on the ground Why did this nothing take so many dumptrucks to get rid of it then. You know about the dumptrucks, you posted a link about them. > and the twin > towers left lot in the air So it's still there? > which are both tell tale signs of a nuclear > controlled demolition. Well as there was no ncd the above is incorrect. > > And the lack of any radiation reading prove they were never published. > But the link about radiation has been posted, and you have told us about Geiger counters going off. You really should remember what you yourself posted. > And even though the North Tower shook like a tuning fork for a few seconds > before it was vaporized the fact seismic data didn't show the North Tower > shaking proves the seismic records were as bogus as the jets were. > What I can't understand is why the Russians, Chinese, Koreans etc tell the whole world about these nukes. Can you explain that? > Rocky > > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:35 -0500
Re: Rocky incoherent again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:45 -0500
Re: Rocky the stalking lunatic raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 19:26 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:38 +0000
Re: Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage (jimp forgets about freeze frame again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:08 -0500
Re: Rocky continues to have delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 22:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K proves she lies about Dimitri) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:27 -0500
Re: Rocky raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 16:34 +0000
Re: Rocky raves on "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Roger has to lie, per his mental defect(s)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 15:01 -0500
Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 15:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:33 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 03:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - (Roger is caught lying again.) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! - (K is caught bulshitting again.) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why does Roger keep using the same lies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 02:19 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 01:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 01:02 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why is Roger DESPERATE to divert attention from his own claims? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 16:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K stop your bickering) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:55 -0500
Re: Rocky's imaginary nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 00:29 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K stop your bickering) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K poves she is a complete asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:42 -0500
Re: stalker rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 16:49 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K poves she is a complete asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 19:11 -0400
Re: Rocky has more delusions and is still jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:39 -0500
Re: Yet more Rocky delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:01 +0000
csiph-web