Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #519414

Re: Rocky continues to have delusions

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Rocky continues to have delusions
Date 2015-09-06 22:32 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <fgrubc-2l4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <w9OdncGwZYLQFHHInZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <njgubc-fi3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <i_KdnatChNwfM3HInZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vaoubc-jb4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <UI-dnWn8G-0KJHHInZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> You are beyond help so don't be surprised if you end up being treated just 
> like I treat the Friendly Neighborhood Nut.

How do you explain the fact that seismographs all over the East Coast
recorded the tiny (about 2) signatures of the two towers collapsing
and the miniscule (about 1.5) signatures of the airplanes crashing in
the Pentagon and the woods, but no seismograph anyhwere on the planet
recorded the huge (about 6) signatures that EACH nuclear device would
have created?

Either every government, academic instutution, seismic research
organization, seismologist and amateur seismologist on the planet
is part of a world wide conspiracy or there were no nuclear bombs
involved on 9/11.

How do you explain the fact that there are videos from New York but
if nuclear bombs had been present the EMP from EACH of the bombs
would have killed all the video cameras in the area?

Either everyone in New York was carrying EMP hardened cameras or
there were no nuclear bombs involved on 9/11.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:50 -0500
  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:38 -0400
      Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:35 -0500
          Re: Rocky incoherent again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:07 +0000
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:09 -0500
              Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:21 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:45 -0500
                Re: Rocky the stalking lunatic raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 19:26 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
                Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:38 +0000
                Re: Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage (jimp forgets about freeze frame again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:08 -0500
                Re: Rocky continues to have delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 22:32 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:06 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K proves she lies about Dimitri) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:27 -0500
                Re: Rocky raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 16:34 +0000
                Re: Rocky raves on "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Roger has to lie, per his mental defect(s)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 15:01 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 15:38 -0400
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:33 -0500
                Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 03:34 +0000
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - (Roger is caught lying again.) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:55 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! - (K  is caught bulshitting again.) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:26 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why does Roger keep using the same lies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:22 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 02:19 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 01:23 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 01:02 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:39 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why is Roger DESPERATE to divert attention from his own claims? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:10 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 16:15 -0400
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:22 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:55 -0500
              Re: Rocky's imaginary nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 00:29 +0000
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:42 -0500
                Re: stalker rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 16:49 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:29 -0400
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 19:11 -0400
  Re: Rocky has more delusions and is still jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:55 +0000
    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:39 -0500
      Re: Yet more Rocky delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:01 +0000

csiph-web