Groups > sci.physics > #519037

Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled>

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled>
Date	2015-09-05 06:16 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<mse1cj$kd6$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<hNWdnUzqlcXoVnXInZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <20150903185317.00004bdf@uk.mo> <bc0nbc-a48.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com> <29mdnVxgU9JzmnfInZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com...

>>>In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects
>>>are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards.
>>
>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation,

>And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from 
>Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from?

Someone else posted the tritium readings.  Slightly above normal, due to
use in airliner exit signs and law enforcement gunsights.  With all the
other stuff going on after 9/11, non-news like no unusual radiation found
just doesn't get reported. As you must know, tritium is a major component
of thermonuclear weapons, so if nukes were used, there should be tritium
all over the place.  But there wasn't.  So, I'll repeat: "Magic nuclear
bombs that produce no radiation (and don't scatter tritium)..."

>> no seismic signature

>But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it 
>were a tuning fork.  And to this date nobody has explained why we were not 
>allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene discribed 
>as if it were a 5.5 quake.

Kooktard, I'll repeat yet again.  The Richter scale is a measure of total
energy, not of the amount of shaking at a particular spot.  A 1 kt nuke
has enough energy to produce about a 4 on the Richter scale.  But the
collapses of the towers measured 2.1 and 2.3 on the Richter scale.  So
the collapses had quite a bit less energy than a 1kt nuke.  That should
tell you something, but you're too k00ktarded to catch on.

And of course, you didn't address *at all* the complete lack of the
distinctive nuclear signature that nuclear explosions produce. Why is
that?

>>  no
>> EMP

>Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver 
>operated by WCBS in Nuke York City.

A nuke produces an EMP *MUCH* bigger than that.  That receiver would have
been wiped out *permanently*, not just a momentary hiccup.  As would all
electronics for miles around.  Helicopters crashing left and right and
so forth.  But none of that happened.  Because there simply was no nuclear
EMP.

>> no fireball

>Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact 
>moment a flash would have occured.

Hahahahahahaha!  This is the usual fallback excuse of kooktards when they
really truly don't have an answer. (unless they ignore it completely, like
no nuclear seismic signature)  It was a conspiracy where "they" edited
all the videos of all those thousands of videocameras, professional and
amateur, that were pointed at the towers when they fell.  And, of course,
nobody witnessed any fireball in person.  A nuclear fireball is freaking 
*OBVIOUS*.

>  Some videos show the smoke jump as if 
>part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that clearly 
>skips.

Spin, spin, spin.

>> no mushroom cloud

>You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin Towers 
>that are consistant with underground nukes:

Nope.  No mushroom cloud rising from the towers after they were nuked.
That's because they weren't nuked!

<snip kookattack rendering the rest of Rocky's reply into unreadable drool>

I'll let you reply again regarding no 5.5 magnitude earthquake, and no
BANG! that a nuke would make.  The NIST report mentioned explosives needed
to cut a column of WTC7 would be some 130 decibels.  How much larger to
cut the columns of a 110 story tower?  How much even louder a nuke would
be!  Hey, Bullwinkle and Rocky (not you) were popular when the towers were
built.  Did they lend them their Hushaboom technology?

Thread

Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400
    Re: Rocky's magic bombs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000
      Re: Rocky's magic bombs burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400
      Re: Rocky's magic bombs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-04 14:54 +0000
        Re: Rocky's magic bombs gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 10:12 -0500
        Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500
          Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000
            Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500
              Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000
                Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 13:33 -0700
                Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 17:45 -0700
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-05 06:39 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:08 +0200
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-05 06:16 +0000
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:25 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:59 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 13:30 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:47 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 15:10 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:13 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:12 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
              Re: Rocky can't remember from one day to the next jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:50 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-06 21:22 +0000
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <liquid scintillation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:01 -0500
                Re: Rocky falls on his face again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 22:27 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:31 +0200
          Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 18:21 +0200
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 16:44 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 17:04 -0500
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-03 20:51 -0500
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:04 -0700
  Re: Rocky still a jobless, batshit crazy stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:02 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:10 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Edward Higgs" <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 19:09 -0700
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:49 -0400
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500

csiph-web