Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #519456

Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky, in <news:8-idnaTORNALd3bInZ2dnUU7-RGdnZ2d@giganews.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
> news:mse1cj$kd6$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>
>>>>>In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects
>>>>>are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards.
>>>>
>>>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation,
>>
>>>And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from
>>>Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from?
>>
>> Someone else posted the tritium readings.
> 
> ROTFLMAO because
> NO GEIGER COUNTER WILL DETECT TRITIUM; LIQUID SCINTILLATION TECHNIQUES MUST 
> BE UTILIZED.

Point One:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

<http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf>
===============
The data clearly demonstrate the large amount of tritium released due
to hydrogen bombs, the first of which was tested in 1951. Thus,
tritium is a tracer for hydrogen bombs, the "smoking gun." Can
proponents of the WTC-mini-nuke hypothesis explain how large releases
of tritium did NOT happen on 9/11/2001?

Sediment cores pulled from the Hudson River near the World Trade
Center site just a month after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks
contain a thin layer of metal-rich ash and pulverized debris. The top
3 cm of silt contained layers with unnaturally high concentrations of
copper, strontium, and zinc from the towers, says Sarah D. Oktay, a
geochemist. "Oktay and her colleagues also found that the sediments
contain small but measurable quantities of iodine-131, a human-made
radioactive isotope with a half-life of about 8 days. Total iodine
concentrations were actually lower in the [WTC] debris-filled layers,
which means the source of the element probably isn't related to the
attacks."

Radionuclides. We analyzed the gamma spectrum of the samples using an
EG&G/Ortec high-purity Ge detector (50% relative efficiency) gamma
counter (EG&G/Ortec Instruments, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN). We analyzed
approximately 50 peaks based on statistical significance
(counting/lack of interferences). These included thorium, uranium,
actinium series, and primordial radionuclides. Liquid scintillation
analyses were conducted for emissions on the total dust and smoke
samples using a Packard Tri-Carb Model 2770 TR/SL (Packard Instrument,
Meriden, CT). The MDA for alpha radioactivity was 0.30 DPM (0.14 pCi)
based on a NIST-traceable 226Ra standard (National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD).

Results. We found only background levels of alpha radionuclide
activity by liquid scintillation counter analysis of all three
samples. Beta activity was slightly elevated, but not more than twice
the background level. There were no levels of gamma activity > 1 Bq/g
except for naturally occurring potassium-40. These very low levels of
radioactive isotopes (radionuclides) in the WTC dust are by themselves
sufficient to rule out the use of atomic bombs (even as triggers) at
the WTC, which could be construed as an absurd notion as it confronts
the empirical facts.
===============

{NOTE: The elevated beta radiation was likely just as I stated, the
tritium from the airplane exit signs and law enforcement weapon
sights. Beta particles are nothing more than high-energy electrons.}

- Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb
fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is strong
evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis.

- The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually lower
in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers.

- Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium, which
is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself does not
rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not support the
mini-nuke hypothesis.

- Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium,
actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the background
level for WTC dust.

- Nuclear activation or residual "fall-out" radioactivity (above
background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on
actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low Iodine-131
measured by independent researchers (point 2 above) and the low
radionuclide counts (point 4 above) and again provides compelling
evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers hypothesis.

- No fatalities due to radiation "burning" were reported near ground
zero. William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse. No observed
melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the Towers.

- One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where
vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the collapse,
and the building fell quite neatly onto its own footprint. (Molten
metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as well.)
=====================================================

This has all been explained several times to you before, Roger. That
you keep popping back up like some retarded Weebles Wobble But They
Don't Fall Down after your idiocy is smacked down into the gutter
where it belongs proves your broken brain is desperately grasping at
straws because having to admit *you* *are* *wrong* would send you
spinning into an unrelenting insanity from which you'd never recover.
So your broken brain has decided to ease its way into that insanity.

Take your meds, Roger Wittekind. This doesn't end until you get
professional psychiatric help and admit *you* *are* *wrong*. Until
then, your life just gets worse and worse. We'll see to that.

Moron. LOL

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Point Two:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

<http://www.brazoshealth.org/sites/all/themes/health/images/pdfs/messages_in_the_dust.pdf>
============================================================
Geyh herself wore a respirator when she felt the air quality had
gotten so bad that she had to. "But you couldn't do it all day," she
says. "It was too cumbersome."
============================================================

And in that same PDF file
============================================================
Once the event had been declared an act of terrorism, the first
response was to send in inspectors to check the air and debris to make
sure there were no signs of radiation or radioactive cargo, says
McKinney.

A major concern was that terrorists could have unleashed a so-called
"dirty bomb", an explosive device containing radioactive compounds
like cesium. Within minutes of the crash, McKinney sent a radiological
health inspector to check the site for any radiation sources. He
reached Richard Borri, a senior scientist in the department's office
of Radiological Health, who like most people from DOH, was on his way
to work when the first tower was hit.

Borri checked the World Trade Center site for signs of radiation
before and after the collapse of the buildings. Radiation could have
originated in industrial radiology sources, such as the installing
beams of the huge office buildings, which may have contained some
radioactive elements from x-rays taken, and from depleted uranium used
in ballasts in aircraft wing tips (such counterweights in airplane
wing tips give the most weight for least volume, says Borri). It might
also be left from any medical or dental offices. The far more serious
threat, of course, was the chance that one of the hijackers might have
carried a suitcase of radioactive materials or a dirty bomb, a
conventional bomb spiked with radioactive material. Such a bomb has
been compared to TNT, strapped to a container of plutonium or
plutonium-contaminated waste. This kind of a device would not produce
a nuclear explosion, but it could spread deadly radioactive matter
across a swath of city. According to Borri, the fear with a dirty bomb
is that hundreds, maybe thousands, could die from radiation poisoning
and cancer, and the area could be poisoned for years. (Plutonium-239
has a half-life of 24,000 years, says Borri.)

That was fortunately not the case, Borri found, using a portable
liquid scintillation counter, which measures radioactivity like a
Geiger counter. The high-tech portable gadget he carried, one of the
few available in the United States, is far more precise than its
century-old cousin, the Geiger counter with a much more refined
ability to detect any kind of radioactivity.

"If you're creative you can get what you need to without getting in
another agency's way pulling samples," says Borri, who was dodging
fire trucks and police vehicles and hordes of people streaming out of
the building. "It's not a good idea to walk into the center of the
action. Some of the people weren't walking as slowly as I was."

Although Borri didn't turn up any problematic radioactive readings by
the end of the day, his work would be supplemented by the federal
Department of Energy, whose technicians remained on site and continued
to sample.

[Only during the last days of the Ground Zero cleanup would
radioactive testers find any evidence of radioactive emissions, from a
pharmacy laboratory located within one of the buildings.]

Moron. LOL

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> From: 
> http://www.ehs.msu.edu/radiation/programs_guidelines/radmanual/41rm_monitorinstru.htm

Nice CAPSfoam, Roger... your broken brain is getting more and more
perturbed as it writhes and squirms in trying to get your kooky
conspiracy theory to attain a semblance of plausibility...
unfortunately, the more you try, the more unresolvable logic holes you
create for yourself. Now you've got two of them:

> Rocky

1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below
the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to
today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that
depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's
*why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al
Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human
history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep
Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a
nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of
the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused
the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would
have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the
immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized
your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's
no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been
from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of
radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the
tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights
that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a
nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how
delusional you are.

4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or
anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>).
They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear
weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation.

5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people
in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed,
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2
MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were
buried.

6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay
byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it
decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any
sort of nuclear chain reaction.

7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it*
*was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical
support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount
of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to
survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be
approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature
would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a
hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding
rock.

10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects
were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.

11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent
down to service those nukes (because now that you know the
neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a
periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire
facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the
technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with
"4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to
admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33
years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960
to 1840 degree heat?

12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
(your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?

13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC
site on 11 Sep 2001?

14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?

15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have
tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles
deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC
complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to
detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up
your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which
you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference
was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The
Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).

16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes
(MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your
previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3
nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming
under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in
agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is?
While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps
(radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was
primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any
contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in
place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this
*still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed
"EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where
your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly
head again. LOL

17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your
"34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes
(MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually,
your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the
real city was blown up by
1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes
which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground
MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet
and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC
and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the
fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn
out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every
piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's
*proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL

18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation
byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words
"with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID:
<43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>).

19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that
got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have
is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you.

21) Now you're k'laming that the reason no one is hearing these
devastatingly loud blasts from your "nuclear terrorism era" is because
they're using magical "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to silence
the nukes.

Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back
on your meds, you delusional loon.

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400
    Re: Rocky's magic bombs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000
      Re: Rocky's magic bombs burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400
      Re: Rocky's magic bombs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-04 14:54 +0000
        Re: Rocky's magic bombs gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 10:12 -0500
        Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500
          Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000
            Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500
              Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000
                Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 13:33 -0700
                Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 17:45 -0700
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-05 06:39 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:08 +0200
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-05 06:16 +0000
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:25 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:59 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 13:30 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:47 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 15:10 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:13 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:12 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
              Re: Rocky can't remember from one day to the next jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:50 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-06 21:22 +0000
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <liquid scintillation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:01 -0500
                Re: Rocky falls on his face again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 22:27 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:31 +0200
          Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 18:21 +0200
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 16:44 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 17:04 -0500
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-03 20:51 -0500
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:04 -0700
  Re: Rocky still a jobless, batshit crazy stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:02 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:10 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Edward Higgs" <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 19:09 -0700
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:49 -0400
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500

csiph-web