Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #507149

Re: A practical guide to countering science denial

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:24:30 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 

<snip>

>>>>>
>>>>>> In the yet to be released "Ant-Man" movie the main character is named 
>>>>>> Scott Lang, obviously a derivation of Lanze, the Illuminati courier's 
>>>>>> name. Michael Douglas in a supporting role plays a Dr. Pym.
>>>>> Oh, obviously....not.
>>>> They might have called him Scott Lanz but the name Lanza had already 
>>>> been taken, you know the name of the Sandy Hook false flag shooter Adam 
>>>> Lanza which is a conglomeration of Adam Weishaupt and the illuminati 
>>>> courier Lanze.
>>>      You will, of course, produce evidence for this claim, right?
>>> Failure to do so will be seen as a default admission that you're
>>> lying.
>>>
>>>> So, not obvious to you but then what the hell do YOU know?  Troll Boy!
>>>      BDK has proved, over and over, that he knows more than you. 
>>>      I realize this isn't saying much. The most simple of jokes and
>>> concepts are far above your intellectual level.
>>>
>>>>>> On the 10th, here in the state of Washington, there was this lightning 
>>>>>> event:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/wildfires-washington-state-threaten-homes-prompt-evacuations-210939041.html
>>>>> And so what? it's summer, there are storms and fires start sometimes.
>>>> Too precise to be coincidental within the time frame.
>>>      You're proving how desperate you are.
>>>      Who, exactly, was your god punishing? Clearly not me or BDK. If
>>> he was trying, well, more PROOF that he is incompetent has been
>>> produced. 
>>>      Not that any more was or is needed. You've done a great job of
>>> proving Serapis is unworthy or any form of respect.
>>>
>> You're a damaged, deranged clown who's trying to be the hero.  
> 
>      Your use of projection fails to answer the question I asked. Who,
> exactly was your god trying to punish if he was behind the lightening
> and fires in the state of Washington?
> 
>> Ain't 
>> going to work and you want to know why? Because you're on the wrong side 
>> of things.
> 
>      Serapis doesn't appear to think so. If he exists, which I
> seriously doubt, he's done nothing to stop me.  Or he's too
> incompetent to stop me. 
>      Which will you claim is the correct option?
>      If you see a *realistic* option I don't, present it for review.
> 
>> You know the old saying: "whom the gods would destroy, they first make 
>> mad"?  Looks like it's working on you.
>>
> 
>      Suddenly your off-the-wall posts make much more sense. Your god
> has driven you mad, and not he sets to destroy you.
> 
>> A man's got to know his limitations and clearly you don't know yours.
> 
>      Once I reach them, I'll know.
> 
For a Rice-chaser like you, you exceeded your limitations a long time 
ago.  Thought you were the Robert De Niro of Japan, eh?  How'd that work 
out for you?

Crawl back to your cave you miscreant aspie troglodyte.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-12 17:12 -0700
  Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 03:10 -0500
  Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-13 11:41 -0400
    Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 16:37 -0500
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-13 22:54 -0400
        Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:17 -0500
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 23:19 -0700
        Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:19 -0500
    Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 01:31 -0700
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:21 -0500
        Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 09:24 -0700
          Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-14 15:45 -0400
          Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:56 -0500
            Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 22:59 -0700
              Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 04:47 -0500
                Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-16 08:17 -0700
                Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:39 -0500
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-14 15:54 -0400

csiph-web