Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #507003

Re: A practical guide to countering science denial

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 01:31:23 -0700, EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>>>> An interesting factoid is that today is the 230th anniversary of the 
>>>>>> death of Lanze by lightning.  Now, if you know your Robert Anton Wilson 
>>>>>> you'll know that the number 23 figures prominently in Illuminati lore as 
>>>>>> the "23 Enigma."  In fact, a week from today Marvel Studios releases 
>>>>>> "Ant-Man."  Some synchonicity eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>      No, since to the reasonably prudent mind, 230 and 23 are not the
>>>>> same number. 
>>>> Your 'reasonably prudent mind' obviously wouldn't know that the number 
>>>> 230 can be expressed as 23 times 10.
>>> And?
>> Obviously the "23 Enigma" can be invoked even when you add a "0" to the 
>> number 23.  
> 
>      Nope. Adding a zero to the end makes a completely different
> number.
> 
>> Check your favorite world news sites over the last day or so.
>>
> 
>      Any specific reason he should?
> 
>>>> Ever the contrarian?  Here's some more 'synchronicity' for you to digest.
>>> And here comes more nonsense.
>>>
>>>> In the yet to be released "Ant-Man" movie the main character is named 
>>>> Scott Lang, obviously a derivation of Lanze, the Illuminati courier's 
>>>> name. Michael Douglas in a supporting role plays a Dr. Pym.
>>> Oh, obviously....not.
>> They might have called him Scott Lanz but the name Lanza had already 
>> been taken, you know the name of the Sandy Hook false flag shooter Adam 
>> Lanza which is a conglomeration of Adam Weishaupt and the illuminati 
>> courier Lanze.
>>
> 
>      You will, of course, produce evidence for this claim, right?
> Failure to do so will be seen as a default admission that you're
> lying.
> 
>> So, not obvious to you but then what the hell do YOU know?  Troll Boy!
>>
> 
>      BDK has proved, over and over, that he knows more than you. 
>      I realize this isn't saying much. The most simple of jokes and
> concepts are far above your intellectual level.
> 
>>>> On the 10th, here in the state of Washington, there was this lightning 
>>>> event:
>>>>
>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/wildfires-washington-state-threaten-homes-prompt-evacuations-210939041.html
>>> And so what? it's summer, there are storms and fires start sometimes.
>> Too precise to be coincidental within the time frame.
>>
> 
>      You're proving how desperate you are.
>      Who, exactly, was your god punishing? Clearly not me or BDK. If
> he was trying, well, more PROOF that he is incompetent has been
> produced. 
>      Not that any more was or is needed. You've done a great job of
> proving Serapis is unworthy or any form of respect.
> 

You're a damaged, deranged clown who's trying to be the hero.  Ain't 
going to work and you want to know why? Because you're on the wrong side 
of things.

You know the old saying: "whom the gods would destroy, they first make 
mad"?  Looks like it's working on you.

A man's got to know his limitations and clearly you don't know yours.

--

Abrahamic religions are Pharaonic co-option schemes.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-12 17:12 -0700
  Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 03:10 -0500
  Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-13 11:41 -0400
    Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 16:37 -0500
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-13 22:54 -0400
        Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:17 -0500
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 23:19 -0700
        Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:19 -0500
    Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 01:31 -0700
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 04:21 -0500
        Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 09:24 -0700
          Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-14 15:45 -0400
          Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:56 -0500
            Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-14 22:59 -0700
              Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 04:47 -0500
                Re: A practical guide to countering science denial EOHOE <eohoe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-16 08:17 -0700
                Re: A practical guide to countering science denial "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:39 -0500
      Re: A practical guide to countering science denial BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-14 15:54 -0400

csiph-web