Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim)

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim)
Date	2015-08-30 20:53 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<m37cbc-ump.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<8pqdnTgWlI9u1X_InZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s63abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <n-GdncJAUulY9H_InZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <c7aabc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <Tv2dnfEPMa1L-H7InZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> FYI I downloaded all the NIST reports before they broke them into pieces and 
> made the hard to make heads or tails out of them.

OK, so you downloaded them.

Did you read and understand them?

> Where the Twin Towers are concerned NIST lied about the facts they learned 
> from their real life experiments as proven by Kevin Ryan who was in on those 
> test.

One guy making a youtube video proves nothing.

> And as I've stated before NIST didn't do anything to explain why so much of 
> the Twin Towers remained standing.  See:
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Random chance, get over it.

> But the photo above considers where underground nukes would have to be 
> placed to leave the walls standing from the Twin Towers standing strong. 

Wild conjecture.

> Where WTC7 is concerned NIST tried to hide the fact that WTC7 fell at 100% 
> free fall for the first 100+ feet by using averages.  And nobody cares about 
> what happened to WTC7 after those first 100 feet because it is the first 100 
> feet is consistent with a "Controlled Demolition."  DUH.

As the fall wasn't instrumented, all anyone can do is us averages of
whatever data is available.

How it fell for the first 100 feet is consistant with a LOT of other
things.

So you downloaded the NIST reports but didn't read them, or at least
not for comprehension, because one guy who could be mistaken or
just a kook made a youtube video NIST lied, some of the buildings
were left standing and that is a mystery to you, that the fall of 
WTC7 was not instrumented so an exact velocity is impossible to 
determine, from this you come to the conclusion that:

Nuclear devices numbering somewhere from 3 to 34 were involved in
spite of the facts that there was no unsusual radiation, there were
not somewhere from 3 to 34 EMP's, and there were not somewhere from
3 to 34 magnitude 6 seismic events,

You also conclude that USGS controls every seismograph on the 
planet and seismic readings clearly labled as NOT being from
the USGS are from the USGS.

You also conclude that since nuclear devices require periodic
maintenance that there must have been a maintenace facility
at the bottom of the towers with the equipment, materials and
skilled personnel equivalent to the original manufacturer and
all of this was kept secret in one of the world's busies places
for over 3 decades.

Seek the help of a mental health professional and you may be
able to get a job you can keep for long enough to get a retirement.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

"Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:05 -0500
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:42 -0500
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:38 -0500
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:35 +0000
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:34 +0000
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:25 -0500
      Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:37 -0500
        Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:37 -0500
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:58 +0000
            Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:33 -0500
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:04 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:35 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:00 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:58 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:21 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:28 +0200
                hormesis (http://larouchepub.com noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:28 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 09:56 +0100
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
      Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:34 +0000
        Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:23 -0500
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:53 +0000
            Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:23 -0500
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:01 +0000
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 02:37 +0200
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:00 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:27 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:36 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:45 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:58 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:59 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:29 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:29 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:42 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 07:27 +0200
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (FNN is using outright lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:45 -0500
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 07:23 -0700
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:37 -0500

csiph-web