Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %)

From	"%" <persent@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %)
Date	2015-08-30 20:58 -0700
Organization	Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID	<8nt8ki.vd3.19.1@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <8JGdnUxvucGiOn7InZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <8nt6ac.hvi.19.1@news.alt.net> <uoednVoZj4UtVH7InZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com> <8nt7cg.o3d.19.1@news.alt.net> <uaKdnQVueqxhUH7InZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Rocky wrote:
> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8nt7cg.o3d.19.1@news.alt.net...
>> Rocky wrote:
>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8nt6ac.hvi.19.1@news.alt.net...
>>>> Rocky wrote:
>>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus"
>>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:a10f31364930072adf0c84618af8d401@dizum.com...
>>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking
>>>>> 
>>>>> You asshole.  I won that jury trial12 to 0 without an attorney
>>>>> and I would have won the malicious prosecution lawsuit too if I
>>>>> had been allowed to use the Probable Cause itself that had
>>>>> previously been 
>>>>> used in the jury trial I won to prove both malice and a total lack
>>>>> of good faith. Too bad the bullshit you used above has prevented
>>>>> me from considering
>>>>> any of the bullshit you posted below.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rocky
>>>> 
>>>> there's nothing below
>>> 
>>> But there was when I posted the above.  <G>
>>> 
>>> Rocky
>> 
>> well there isn't now it must've been nuked in a conspiracy nuking
> 
> Yes, it was nuked and right before I pressed the post button.  But
> there was no conspiracy because I still have no idea who forced the
> US to use a built in nuclear demolition scheme to wipe the Twin
> Towers off the map. 
> 
> ===========================
> 
> Hey, I'm watching the following video and it is way way way better
> than I thought it would be.  At least so far because I'm only at 
> 23:36. 
> 
> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U
> 
> Rocky

we're talking about below your post not new york

Thread

"Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:05 -0500
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:42 -0500
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:38 -0500
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:35 +0000
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:34 +0000
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:25 -0500
      Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:37 -0500
        Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:37 -0500
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:58 +0000
            Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:33 -0500
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:04 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:35 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:00 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:58 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:21 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:28 +0200
                hormesis (http://larouchepub.com noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:28 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 09:56 +0100
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
      Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:34 +0000
        Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:23 -0500
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:53 +0000
            Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:23 -0500
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:01 +0000
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 02:37 +0200
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:00 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:27 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:36 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:45 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:58 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:59 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:29 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:29 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:42 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 07:27 +0200
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (FNN is using outright lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:45 -0500
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 07:23 -0700
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:37 -0500

csiph-web